Literature DB >> 24180335

Analysis and interpretation of imaging mass spectrometry data by clustering mass-to-charge images according to their spatial similarity.

Theodore Alexandrov1, Ilya Chernyavsky, Michael Becker, Ferdinand von Eggeling, Sergey Nikolenko.   

Abstract

Imaging mass spectrometry (imaging MS) has emerged in the past decade as a label-free, spatially resolved, and multipurpose bioanalytical technique for direct analysis of biological samples from animal tissue, plant tissue, biofilms, and polymer films. Imaging MS has been successfully incorporated into many biomedical pipelines where it is usually applied in the so-called untargeted mode-capturing spatial localization of a multitude of ions from a wide mass range.3 An imaging MS data set usually comprises thousands of spectra and tens to hundreds of thousands of mass-to-charge (m/z) images and can be as large as several gigabytes. Unsupervised analysis of an imaging MS data set aims at finding hidden structures in the data with no a priori information used and is often exploited as the first step of imaging MS data analysis. We propose a novel, easy-to-use and easy-to-implement approach to answer one of the key questions of unsupervised analysis of imaging MS data: what do all m/z images look like? The key idea of the approach is to cluster all m/z images according to their spatial similarity so that each cluster contains spatially similar m/z images. We propose a visualization of both spatial and spectral information obtained using clustering that provides an easy way to understand what all m/z images look like. We evaluated the proposed approach on matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization imaging MS data sets of a rat brain coronal section and human larynx carcinoma and discussed several scenarios of data analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24180335     DOI: 10.1021/ac401420z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  15 in total

1.  Spatial Segmentation of Mass Spectrometry Imaging Data by Combining Multivariate Clustering and Univariate Thresholding.

Authors:  Hang Hu; Ruichuan Yin; Hilary M Brown; Julia Laskin
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 2.  Unsupervised machine learning for exploratory data analysis in imaging mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Nico Verbeeck; Richard M Caprioli; Raf Van de Plas
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 10.946

3.  Spatial Metabolomics and Imaging Mass Spectrometry in the Age of Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Theodore Alexandrov
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci       Date:  2020-04-13

Review 4.  Mass spectrometry of natural products: current, emerging and future technologies.

Authors:  Amina Bouslimani; Laura M Sanchez; Neha Garg; Pieter C Dorrestein
Journal:  Nat Prod Rep       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 13.423

5.  Optimized Protocol To Analyze Changes in the Lipidome of Xenografts after Treatment with 2-Hydroxyoleic Acid.

Authors:  Roberto Fernández; Jone Garate; Sergio Lage; Silvia Terés; Mónica Higuera; Joan Bestard-Escalas; M Laura Martin; Daniel H López; Francisca Guardiola-Serrano; Pablo V Escribá; Gwendolyn Barceló-Coblijn; José A Fernández
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Developing a Drug Screening Platform: MALDI-Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Paper-Based Cultures.

Authors:  Fernando Tobias; Julie C McIntosh; Gabriel J LaBonia; Matthew W Boyce; Matthew R Lockett; Amanda B Hummon
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  DetectTLC: Automated Reaction Mixture Screening Utilizing Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Image Features.

Authors:  Chanchala D Kaddi; Rachel V Bennett; Martin R L Paine; Mitchel D Banks; Arthur L Weber; Facundo M Fernández; May D Wang
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  Deconvolving molecular signatures of interactions between microbial colonies.

Authors:  Y-C Harn; M J Powers; E A Shank; V Jojic
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Colocalization Features for Classification of Tumors Using Desorption Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry Imaging.

Authors:  Paolo Inglese; Gonçalo Correia; Pamela Pruski; Robert C Glen; Zoltan Takats
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 10.  Mass spectrometry imaging for plant biology: a review.

Authors:  Berin A Boughton; Dinaiz Thinagaran; Daniel Sarabia; Antony Bacic; Ute Roessner
Journal:  Phytochem Rev       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 5.374

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.