Literature DB >> 24179003

Comparative study of medical education as perceived by students at three Dutch universities.

J O Busari1, A J Scherpbier, H P Boshuizen.   

Abstract

Objective. The aim of the present study was to identify the differences that may exist in professional satisfaction and skills (clinical patient management and psychosocial skills) in students and graduates from two traditional medical schools and their counterparts from a problem-based medical school in the Netherlands. Also their satisfaction for their training was investigated. Method. Questionnaires were designed containing items reflecting the earlier mentioned differences between the students. Following an initial pilot study, the questionnaire used in this study was constructed accordingly. Sample. The questionnaires were sent to 180 near and recent graduates of these three schools. Results. A total of 127 questionnaires were returned (response rate of 70.5%). The students of the PBL curriculum felt better prepared in psychosocial and interpersonal skills. They felt more satisfied with their training, but were less enthusiastic with the profession. The results also suggest that in their own opinion students and graduates from the three schools do not differ in clinical patient management skills acquired in medical school. Conclusion. A limitation of this study lies in the fact that results are based on actual self-assessment of the students. One must be aware that self-assessment does not always provide for objective information. However, since this limitation applied equally to respondents of all three medical schools, the differences between the schools can be considered indicative of the effects resulting from the different curricula.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 24179003     DOI: 10.1007/BF00159278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  12 in total

1.  An experiment in medical education. A critical analysis using traditional criteria.

Authors:  L J Goodman; E E Brueschke; R C Bone; W H Rose; E J Williams; H A Paul
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-05-08       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Effects of conventional and problem-based medical curricula on problem solving.

Authors:  V L Patel; G J Groen; G R Norman
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Charting the winds of change: evaluating innovative medical curricula.

Authors:  C P Friedman; R de Bliek; D S Greer; S P Mennin; G R Norman; C G Sheps; D B Swanson; C A Woodward
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Comparing the effects of problem-based and conventional curricula in an international sample.

Authors:  H G Schmidt; W D Dauphinee; V L Patel
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1987-04

5.  Problem-based learning: a review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues.

Authors:  M A Albanese; S Mitchell
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 6.  Problem-based learning: have the expectations been met?

Authors:  L Berkson
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Ratings of students' performances in a third-year internal medicine clerkship: a comparison between problem-based and lecture-based curricula.

Authors:  B F Richards; K P Ober; L Cariaga-Lo; M G Camp; J Philp; M McFarlane; R Rupp; D J Zaccaro
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  Does problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of evaluative research.

Authors:  D T Vernon; R L Blake
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  The influence of the New Pathway curriculum on Harvard medical students.

Authors:  G T Moore; S D Block; C B Style; R Mitchell
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  [Medical knowledge in students from various medical schools: being served with the same sauce?].

Authors:  W Bender; J Cohen-Schotanus; T Imbos; W A Versfelt; M Verwijnen
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd       Date:  1984-05-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.