Literature DB >> 24176665

Intrafraction variations in linac-based image-guided radiosurgery of intracranial lesions.

H Badakhshi1, T Barelkowski, P Wust, V Budach, D Boehmer, R Graf.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study investigated image-guided patient positioning during frameless, mask-based, single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery of intracranial lesions and intrafractional translational and rotational variations in patient positions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A non-invasive head and neck thermoplastic mask was used for immobilization. The Exactrac/Novalis Body system (BrainLAB AG, Germany) was used for kV X-ray imaging guided positioning. Intrafraction displacement data, obtained by imaging after each new table position, were evaluated.
RESULTS: There were 269 radiosurgery treatments performed on 190 patients and a total of 967 setups within different angles. The first measured error after each table rotation (mean 2.6) was evaluated (698 measurements). Intrafraction translational errors were (1 standard deviation [SD]) on average 0.8, 0.8, and 0.7mm for the left-right, superior-inferior, and anterior-posterior directions, respectively, with a mean 3D-vector of 1.0mm (SD 0.9mm) and a range from -5mm to +5mm. On average, 12%, 3%, and 1% of the translational deviations exceeded 1, 2, and 3mm, respectively, in the three directions.
CONCLUSION: The range of intrafraction patient motion in frameless image-guided stereotactic radiosurgery is often not fully mapped by pre- and post-treatment imaging. In the current study, intrafraction motion was assessed by performing measurements at several time points during the course of stereotactic radiosurgery. It was determined that 12% of the intrafraction values in the three dimensions are above 1mm, the usual safety margin applied in stereotactic radiosurgery.
Copyright © 2013 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Guidée par imagerie; Image-guided; Intrafraction variation; Radiochirurgie stéréotaxique; Stereotactic radiosurgery; Variation intrafractionnelle

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24176665     DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2013.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Radiother        ISSN: 1278-3218            Impact factor:   1.018


  5 in total

1.  Analysis of intrafraction motion in CyberKnife-based stereotaxy using mask based immobilization and 6D-skull tracking.

Authors:  Tejinder Kataria; Kushal Narang; Deepak Gupta; Shyam S Bisht; Ashu Abhishek; Shikha Goyal; Trinanjan Basu; K P Karrthick
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2016

2.  Intrafractional 6D head movement increases with time of mask fixation during stereotactic intracranial RT-sessions.

Authors:  Julian Mangesius; Thomas Seppi; Rocco Weigel; Christoph Reinhold Arnold; Danijela Vasiljevic; Georg Goebel; Peter Lukas; Ute Ganswindt; Meinhard Nevinny-Stickel
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.481

3.  Positions of radiation isocenter and the couch rotation center established by Winston-Lutz and optical measurements.

Authors:  Paul Jursinic; Karl Jordan; Chen Chen
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-02-17

4.  Intrafractional monitoring of patients using four different immobilization mask systems for cranial radiotherapy.

Authors:  Daniel Reitz; Johannes Muecke; Vanessa da Silva Mendes; Guillaume Landry; Michael Reiner; Maximilian Niyazi; Claus Belka; Philipp Freislederer; Stefanie Corradini
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-07-25

5.  Analysis of translational errors in frame-based and frameless cranial radiosurgery using an anthropomorphic phantom.

Authors:  Taynná Vernalha Rocha Almeida; Arno Lotar Cordova Junior; Pedro Argolo Piedade; Cintia Mara da Silva; Priscila Marins; Cristiane Maria Almeida; Gabriela R Baseggio Brincas; Danyel Scheidegger Soboll
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.