Literature DB >> 24176119

Efficiency of different selection strategies against boar taint in pigs.

A M Haberland1, H Luther2, A Hofer2, E Tholen3, H Simianer1, B Lind4, C Baes2.   

Abstract

The breeding scheme of a Swiss sire line was modeled to compare different target traits and information sources for selection against boar taint. The impact of selection against boar taint on production traits was assessed for different economic weights of boar taint compounds. Genetic gain and breeding costs were evaluated using ZPlan+, a software based on selection index theory, gene flow method and economic modeling. Scenario I reflected the currently practiced breeding strategy as a reference scenario without selection against boar taint. Scenario II incorporated selection against the chemical compounds of boar taint, androstenone (AND), skatole (SKA) and indole (IND) with economic weights of -2.74, -1.69 and -0.99 Euro per unit of the log transformed trait, respectively. As information sources, biopsy-based performance testing of live boars (BPT) was compared with genomic selection (GS) and a combination of both. Scenario III included selection against the subjectively assessed human nose score (HNS) of boar taint. Information sources were either station testing of full and half sibs of the selection candidate or GS against HNS of boar taint compounds. In scenario I, annual genetic gain of log-transformed AND (SKA; IND) was 0.06 (0.09; 0.02) Euro, which was because of favorable genetic correlations with lean meat percentage and meat surface. In scenario II, genetic gain increased to 0.28 (0.20; 0.09) Euro per year when conducting BPT. Compared with BPT, genetic gain was smaller with GS. A combination of BPT and GS only marginally increased annual genetic gain, whereas variable costs per selection candidate augmented from 230 Euro (BPT) to 330 Euro (GS) or 380 Euro (both). The potential of GS was found to be higher when selecting against HNS, which has a low heritability. Annual genetic gain from GS was higher than from station testing of 4 full sibs and 76 half sibs with one or two measurements. The most effective strategy to reduce HNS was selecting against chemical compounds by conducting BPT. Because of heritabilities higher than 0.45 for AND, SKA and IND and high genetic correlations to HNS, the (correlated) response in units of the trait could be increased by 62% compared with scenario III with GS and even by 79% compared with scenario III, with station testing of siblings with two measurements. Increasing the economic weights of boar taint compounds amplified negative effects on average daily gain, drip loss and intramuscular fat percentage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24176119     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731113001857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  5 in total

1.  Genome-wide association analyses for boar taint components and testicular traits revealed regions having pleiotropic effects.

Authors:  Christine Große-Brinkhaus; Leonie C Storck; Luc Frieden; Christiane Neuhoff; Karl Schellander; Christian Looft; Ernst Tholen
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 2.797

Review 2.  Recent genetic advances on boar taint reduction as an alternative to castration: a review.

Authors:  Darlene Ana Souza Duarte; Martine Schroyen; Rodrigo Reis Mota; Sylvie Vanderick; Nicolas Gengler
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Optimization of Swine Breeding Programs Using Genomic Selection with ZPLAN.

Authors:  B M Lopez; H S Kang; T H Kim; V S Viterbo; H S Kim; C S Na; K S Seo
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 2.509

4.  Fine mapping of a QTL affecting levels of skatole on pig chromosome 7.

Authors:  Maren van Son; Matthew P Kent; Harald Grove; Rahul Agarwal; Hanne Hamland; Sigbjørn Lien; Eli Grindflek
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 2.797

Review 5.  How to Improve Meat Quality and Welfare in Entire Male Pigs by Genetics.

Authors:  Catherine Larzul
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.