Literature DB >> 33405214

Recent genetic advances on boar taint reduction as an alternative to castration: a review.

Darlene Ana Souza Duarte1, Martine Schroyen2, Rodrigo Reis Mota2, Sylvie Vanderick2, Nicolas Gengler2.   

Abstract

Boar taint is an unpleasant odor in male pig meat, mainly caused by androstenone, skatole, and indole, which are deposited in the fat tissue. Piglet castration is the most common practice to prevent boar taint. However, castration is likely to be banished in a few years due to animal welfare concerns. Alternatives to castration, such as genetic selection, have been assessed. Androstenone and skatole have moderate to high heritability, which makes it feasible to select against these compounds. This review presents the latest results obtained on genetic selection against boar taint, on correlation with other traits, on differences in breeds, and on candidate genes related to boar taint. QTLs for androstenone and skatole have been reported mainly on chromosomes 6, 7, and 14. These chromosomes were reported to contain genes responsible for synthesis and degradation of androstenone and skatole. A myriad of work has been done to find markers or genes that can be used to select animals with lower boar taint. The selection against boar taint could decrease performance of some reproduction traits. However, a favorable response on production traits has been observed by selecting against boar taint. Selection results have shown that it is possible to reduce boar taint in few generations. In addition, modifications in diet and environment conditions could be associated with genetic selection to reduce boar taint. Nevertheless, costs to measure and select against boar taint should be rewarded with incentives from the market; otherwise, it would be difficult to implement genetic selection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Androstenone; Castration alternatives; Genetic selection; Pigs; Skatole

Year:  2021        PMID: 33405214     DOI: 10.1007/s13353-020-00598-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Genet        ISSN: 1234-1983            Impact factor:   3.240


  65 in total

1.  The problem of taint in pork: 1. Detection thresholds and odour profiles of androstenone and skatole in a model system.

Authors:  I E Annor-Frempong; G R Nute; F W Whittington; J D Wood
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Inter-laboratory comparison of methods to measure androstenone in pork fat.

Authors:  S Ampuero Kragten; B Verkuylen; H Dahlmans; M Hortos; J A Garcia-Regueiro; E Dahl; O Andresen; H Feitsma; P K Mathur; B Harlizius
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Evaluation of various boar taint detection methods.

Authors:  M Aluwé; F A M Tuyttens; K M Bekaert; S De Smet; D L De Brabander; S Millet
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Influence of soiling on boar taint in boars.

Authors:  M Aluwé; K M Bekaert; F A M Tuyttens; L Vanhaecke; S De Smet; H F De Brabander; D L De Brabander; S Millet
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  The effect of age on distribution of skatole and indole levels in entire male pigs in four breeds: Yorkshire, Landrace, Hampshire and Duroc.

Authors:  J Babol; G Zamaratskaia; R K Juneja; K Lundström
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Acceptability of entire male pork with various levels of androstenone and skatole by consumers according to their sensitivity to androstenone.

Authors:  M Bonneau; P Chevillon
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Influence of breed and slaughter weight on boar taint prevalence in entire male pigs.

Authors:  M Aluwé; S Millet; K M Bekaert; F A M Tuyttens; L Vanhaecke; S De Smet; D L De Brabander
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Evaluation of different heating methods for the detection of boar taint by means of the human nose.

Authors:  K M Bekaert; M Aluwé; L Vanhaecke; L Heres; L Duchateau; F Vandendriessche; F A M Tuyttens
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Host Genome Influence on Gut Microbial Composition and Microbial Prediction of Complex Traits in Pigs.

Authors:  Amelia Camarinha-Silva; Maria Maushammer; Robin Wellmann; Marius Vital; Siegfried Preuss; Jörn Bennewitz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  A performance test for boar taint compounds in live boars.

Authors:  C Baes; S Mattei; H Luther; S Ampuero; X Sidler; G Bee; P Spring; A Hofer
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.