BACKGROUND: Vitamin D deficiency is associated with hypertension; however, it is unclear whether vitamin D influences therapeutic blood pressure reduction. Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) reduces blood pressure in resistant hypertension. We hypothesized that vitamin D might influence blood pressure response to RDN. METHODS: Vitamin D was measured in 101 patients with resistant hypertension undergoing RDN. The associations between vitamin D status and systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction 6 months after RDN were analyzed. RESULTS: Mean office SBP at baseline was 171.5 ± 2 mmHg. After RDN, mean office SBP was reduced by 28.4 ± 2.3 mmHg (p = 0.007). 85 patients (84.2 %) had SBP reductions >10 mmHg (responders). Vitamin D concentrations were lower in non-responders as compared to responders (9.9 ± 4.5 vs. 13.7 ± 7.4 ng/ml, p = 0.008). Non-responders (n = 16, 15.8 %), more often had a vitamin D concentration below the median as compared to responders (81 vs. 46 %, p = 0.013). The percentage of patients with normal vitamin D concentrations increased with increasing tertiles of SBP reduction (p for trend = 0.020). In patients with vitamin D concentrations below the median, SBP reduction was lower as compared to patients with a vitamin D concentration above the median (23.5 ± 3.2 vs. 33.7 ± 3.2 mmHg, p = 0.026). Baseline vitamin D concentrations correlated with SBP reduction (r = 0.202, p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with resistant hypertension, low vitamin D concentrations were associated with a decreased SBP response and a higher rate of non-response.
BACKGROUND:Vitamin D deficiency is associated with hypertension; however, it is unclear whether vitamin D influences therapeutic blood pressure reduction. Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) reduces blood pressure in resistant hypertension. We hypothesized that vitamin D might influence blood pressure response to RDN. METHODS:Vitamin D was measured in 101 patients with resistant hypertension undergoing RDN. The associations between vitamin D status and systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction 6 months after RDN were analyzed. RESULTS: Mean office SBP at baseline was 171.5 ± 2 mmHg. After RDN, mean office SBP was reduced by 28.4 ± 2.3 mmHg (p = 0.007). 85 patients (84.2 %) had SBP reductions >10 mmHg (responders). Vitamin D concentrations were lower in non-responders as compared to responders (9.9 ± 4.5 vs. 13.7 ± 7.4 ng/ml, p = 0.008). Non-responders (n = 16, 15.8 %), more often had a vitamin D concentration below the median as compared to responders (81 vs. 46 %, p = 0.013). The percentage of patients with normal vitamin D concentrations increased with increasing tertiles of SBP reduction (p for trend = 0.020). In patients with vitamin D concentrations below the median, SBP reduction was lower as compared to patients with a vitamin D concentration above the median (23.5 ± 3.2 vs. 33.7 ± 3.2 mmHg, p = 0.026). Baseline vitamin D concentrations correlated with SBP reduction (r = 0.202, p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with resistant hypertension, low vitamin D concentrations were associated with a decreased SBP response and a higher rate of non-response.
Authors: Felix Mahfoud; Frank Himmel; Christian Ukena; Heribert Schunkert; Michael Böhm; Joachim Weil Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2011-10-28 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Anastassios G Pittas; Mei Chung; Thomas Trikalinos; Joanna Mitri; Michael Brendel; Kamal Patel; Alice H Lichtenstein; Joseph Lau; Ethan M Balk Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2010-03-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Paul A Sobotka; Felix Mahfoud; Markus P Schlaich; Uta C Hoppe; Michael Böhm; Henry Krum Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2011-06-19 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Oliver Dörr; Sebastian Ewen; Christoph Liebetrau; Helge Möllmann; Luise Gaede; Dominik Linz; Mathias Hohl; Christian Troidl; Timm Bauer; Michael Böhm; Christian Hamm; Felix Mahfoud; Holger Nef Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2015-05-26 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Eberhard P Scholz; Philip Raake; Dierk Thomas; Britta Vogel; Hugo A Katus; Erwin Blessing Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2014-08-07 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Christian Ott; Joanna M Harazny; Axel Schmid; Tilmann Ditting; Roland Veelken; Marek Bladowski; Georg Michelson; Michael Uder; Roland E Schmieder Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 5.460