Literature DB >> 24171472

Proteome digestion specificity analysis for rational design of extended bottom-up and middle-down proteomics experiments.

Ünige A Laskay1, Anna A Lobas, Kristina Srzentić, Mikhail V Gorshkov, Yury O Tsybin.   

Abstract

Mass spectrometry (MS)-based bottom-up proteomics (BUP) is currently the method of choice for large-scale identification and characterization of proteins present in complex samples, such as cell lysates, body fluids, or tissues. Technically, BUP relies on MS analysis of complex mixtures of small, <3 kDa, peptides resulting from whole proteome digestion. Because of the extremely high sample complexity, further developments of detection methods and sample preparation techniques are necessary. In recent years, a number of alternative approaches such as middle-down proteomics (MDP, addressing up to 15 kDa peptides) and top-down proteomics (TDP, addressing proteins exceeding 15 kDa) have been gaining particular interest. Here we report on the bioinformatics study of both common and less frequently employed digestion procedures for complex protein mixtures specifically targeting the MDP approach. The aim of this study was to maximize the yield of protein structure information from MS data by optimizing peptide size distribution and sequence specificity. We classified peptides into four categories based on molecular weight: 0.6-3 (classical BUP), 3-7 (extended BUP), 7-15 kDa (MDP), and >15 kDa (TDP). Because of instrumentation-related considerations, we first advocate for the extended BUP approach as the potential near-future improvement of BUP. Therefore, we chose to optimize the number of unique peptides in the 3-7 kDa range while maximizing the number of represented proteins. The present study considers human, yeast, and bacterial proteomes. Results of the study can be further used for designing extended BUP or MDP experimental workflows.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24171472     DOI: 10.1021/pr400522h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  11 in total

1.  Analysis of Monoclonal Antibody Sequence and Post-translational Modifications by Time-controlled Proteolysis and Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Lichao Zhang; A Michelle English; Dina L Bai; Scott A Ugrin; Jeffrey Shabanowitz; Mark M Ross; Donald F Hunt; Wei-Han Wang
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-11-29       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Comparison of Collisional and Electron-Based Dissociation Modes for Middle-Down Analysis of Multiply Glycosylated Peptides.

Authors:  Kshitij Khatri; Yi Pu; Joshua A Klein; Juan Wei; Catherine E Costello; Cheng Lin; Joseph Zaia
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 3.  Proteomic discovery of non-invasive biomarkers of localized prostate cancer using mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Amanda Khoo; Lydia Y Liu; Julius O Nyalwidhe; O John Semmes; Danny Vesprini; Michelle R Downes; Paul C Boutros; Stanley K Liu; Thomas Kislinger
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Paleoproteomics.

Authors:  Christina Warinner; Kristine Korzow Richter; Matthew J Collins
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 72.087

Review 5.  Middle-down approach: a choice to sequence and characterize proteins/proteomes by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  P Boomathi Pandeswari; Varatharajan Sabareesh
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 4.036

6.  Top-Down Proteomics and Farm Animal and Aquatic Sciences.

Authors:  Alexandre M O Campos; André M de Almeida
Journal:  Proteomes       Date:  2016-12-21

7.  Toward an Optimized Workflow for Middle-Down Proteomics.

Authors:  Alba Cristobal; Fabio Marino; Harm Post; Henk W P van den Toorn; Shabaz Mohammed; Albert J R Heck
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Top or Middle? Up or Down? Toward a Standard Lexicon for Protein Top-Down and Allied Mass Spectrometry Approaches.

Authors:  Frederik Lermyte; Yury O Tsybin; Peter B O'Connor; Joseph A Loo
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.109

9.  In Vitro Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Peptides Obtained by Tryptic Shaving of Surface Proteins of Streptococcus thermophilus LMD-9.

Authors:  Rania Allouche; Zeeshan Hafeez; Florent Papier; Annie Dary-Mourot; Magali Genay; Laurent Miclo
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-04-16

10.  Domain Mapping of Chondroitin/Dermatan Sulfate Glycosaminoglycans Enables Structural Characterization of Proteoglycans.

Authors:  Andrea Persson; Mahnaz Nikpour; Egor Vorontsov; Jonas Nilsson; Göran Larson
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 5.911

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.