Literature DB >> 24169999

Qualitative and quantitative characterization of RAPD variation among snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) genotypes.

P W Skroch1, J Nienhuis.   

Abstract

Ten snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) genotypes were screened for polymorphism with 400 RAPD (random amplified polymorphic DNA) primers. Polymorphic RAPDs were scored and classified into three categories based on ethidium bromide staining intensity. An average of 5.19 RAPD bands were scored per primer for the 364 primers that gave scorable amplification products. An average of 2.15 polymorphic RAPDs were detected per primer. The results show that primer screening may reduce the number of RAPD reactions required for the analysis of genetic relationships among snap-bean genotypes by over 60%. Based on the analysis of the distribution of RAPD amplification, the same number of polymorphic RAPDs were amplified from different genotypes for all RAPD band intensity levels. A comparison of RAPD band amplification frequency among genotypes for the three categories of bands classified by amplification strength revealed a measurable difference in the frequencies of RAPDs classified as faint (weakly amplifying) compared to RAPD bands classified as bold (strongly amplifying) indicating a possible scoring error due to the underscoring of faint bands. Correlation analysis showed that RAPD bands amplified by the same primer are not more closely correlated then RAPD bands amplified by different primers but are more highly correlated then expected by chance. Pairwise comparisons of RAPD bands indicate that the distribution of RAPD amplification among genotypes will be a useful criterion for establishing RAPD band identity. For the average pairwise comparison of genotypes, 50% of primers tested and 15.8% of all scored RAPDs detected polymorphism. Based on RAPD data Nei's average gene diversity at a locus was 0.158 based on all scorable RAPD bands and 0.388 if only polymorphic RAPD loci were considered. RAPD-derived 1 relationships among genotypes are reported for the ten genotypes included in this study. The data presented here demonstrate that many informative, polymorphic RAPDs can be found among snap bean cultivars. These RAPDs may be useful for the unique identification of bean varieties, the organization of bean germplasm, and applications of molecular markers to bean breeding.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 24169999     DOI: 10.1007/BF00223922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  14 in total

1.  Extraction of DNA from milligram amounts of fresh, herbarium and mummified plant tissues.

Authors:  S O Rogers; A J Bendich
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 4.076

2.  Impact of scoring error and reproducibility RAPD data on RAPD based estimates of genetic distance.

Authors:  P Skroch; J Nienhuis
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Random amplified polymorphic DNA and pedigree relationships in spring barley.

Authors:  N A Tinker; M G Fortin; D E Mather
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Identification and potential use of a molecular marker for rust resistance in common bean.

Authors:  P N Miklas; J R Stavely; J D Kelly
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Inheritance of RAPDs in F1 hybrids of corn.

Authors:  M Heun; T Helentjaris
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers.

Authors:  J G Williams; A R Kubelik; K J Livak; J A Rafalski; S V Tingey
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-11-25       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Long-range jumping of incompletely extended polymerase chain fragments generates unexpected products.

Authors:  L M Huang; K T Jeang
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.993

8.  Reproducibility of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis among laboratories.

Authors:  G A Penner; A Bush; R Wise; W Kim; L Domier; K Kasha; A Laroche; G Scoles; S J Molnar; G Fedak
Journal:  PCR Methods Appl       Date:  1993-05

9.  Using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA for evaluating genetic relationships among papaya cultivars.

Authors:  J I Stiles; C Lemme; S Sondur; M B Morshidi; R Manshardt
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Identification and classification of celery cultivars with RAPD markers.

Authors:  X Yang; C Quiros
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.699

View more
  5 in total

1.  Genetic diversity of Chinese common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces assessed with simple sequence repeat markers.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Zhang; Matthew W Blair; Shumin Wang
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Impact of scoring error and reproducibility RAPD data on RAPD based estimates of genetic distance.

Authors:  P Skroch; J Nienhuis
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Extensive diversity and inter-genepool introgression in a world-wide collection of indeterminate snap bean accessions.

Authors:  Matthew W Blair; Alejandro Chaves; Adriana Tofiño; Juan Felipe Calderón; Juan Diego Palacio
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and Derived Techniques.

Authors:  Kantipudi Nirmal Babu; Thotten Elampilay Sheeja; Divakaran Minoo; Muliyar Krishna Rajesh; Kukkamgai Samsudeen; Erinjery Jose Suraby; Illathidath Payatatti Vijesh Kumar
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

5.  Assessment of genetic diversity in Vigna unguiculata L. (Walp) accessions using inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) and start codon targeted (SCoT) polymorphic markers.

Authors:  David Okeh Igwe; Celestine Azubike Afiukwa; Benjamin Ewa Ubi; Kenneth Idika Ogbu; Omena Bernard Ojuederie; George Nkem Ude
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 2.797

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.