OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality and patient satisfaction in Endoscopy Unit of Shifa International Hospital. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Division of Gastroenterology, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan, from July 2011 to January 2012. METHODOLOGY: Quality and patient satisfaction after the endoscopic procedure was assessed using a modified GHAA-9 questionnaire. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 16. RESULTS: A total of 1028 patients were included with a mean age of 45 ± 14.21 years. Out of all the procedures, 670 (65.17%) were gastroscopies, 181 (17.60%) were flexible sigmoidoscopies and 177 (17.21%) were colonoscopies. The maximum unsatisfactory responses were on the waiting time before the procedure (13.13 %), followed by unsatisfactory explanation of the procedure and answers to questions (7.58%). Overall, unsatisfied impression was 4.86%. The problem rate was 6.22%. CONCLUSION: The quality of procedures and level of satisfaction of patients undergoing a gastroscopy or colonoscopy was generally good. The factors that influence the satisfaction of these patients are related to communication between doctor and patient, doctor's manner and waiting time for the procedure. Feedback information in an endoscopy unit may be useful in improving standards, including the performance of endoscopists.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality and patient satisfaction in Endoscopy Unit of Shifa International Hospital. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Division of Gastroenterology, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan, from July 2011 to January 2012. METHODOLOGY: Quality and patient satisfaction after the endoscopic procedure was assessed using a modified GHAA-9 questionnaire. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 16. RESULTS: A total of 1028 patients were included with a mean age of 45 ± 14.21 years. Out of all the procedures, 670 (65.17%) were gastroscopies, 181 (17.60%) were flexible sigmoidoscopies and 177 (17.21%) were colonoscopies. The maximum unsatisfactory responses were on the waiting time before the procedure (13.13 %), followed by unsatisfactory explanation of the procedure and answers to questions (7.58%). Overall, unsatisfied impression was 4.86%. The problem rate was 6.22%. CONCLUSION: The quality of procedures and level of satisfaction of patients undergoing a gastroscopy or colonoscopy was generally good. The factors that influence the satisfaction of these patients are related to communication between doctor and patient, doctor's manner and waiting time for the procedure. Feedback information in an endoscopy unit may be useful in improving standards, including the performance of endoscopists.
Authors: Mayur Brahmania; Madison Young; Chetty Muthiah; Alexandra Ilnyckyj; Donald Duerksen; Dana C Moffatt Journal: Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2015-05-21
Authors: Jenna L McCauley; Mary Ashley Mercer; Kelly S Barth; Kathleen T Brady; Sudie E Back Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2014-06-25 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Ankita Munjal; Joshua M Steinberg; Afnan Mossaad; Samuel J Kallus; Mark C Mattar; Nadim G Haddad Journal: World J Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2018-01-16