Literature DB >> 24169211

Optimizing prostate cancer screening; prospective randomized controlled study of the role of PSA and PCA3 testing in a sequential manner in an opportunistic screening program.

J Rubio-Briones1, J Casanova2, R Dumont2, L Rubio3, A Fernandez-Serra3, I Casanova-Salas3, J Domínguez-Escrig2, M Ramírez-Backhaus2, A Collado2, A Gómez-Ferrer2, I Iborra2, J L Monrós2, J V Ricós2, E Solsona2, D Salas4, F Martínez5, J A Lopez-Guerrero3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To reduce unnecessary biopsies (Bx) in an opportunistic screening programme of prostate cancer.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We perform a prospective evaluation of PCA3 as a second line biomarker in an opportunistic screening for prostate cancer (PCa). From September-2010 until September-2012, 2,366 men, aged 40-74 years and with >10 years life expectancy, were initially screened with PSA/digital rectal examination (DRE). Men with previous Bx or with recent urine infections were excluded. Men with abnormal DRE and/or PSA >3 ng/ml were submitted for PCA3. All men with PCA3 ≥ 35 underwent an initial biopsy (IBx) -12cores-. Men with PCA3 < 35 were randomized 1:1 to either IBx or observation. Re-biopsy(16-18 cores) criteria were PSA increase >.5 ng/ml at 4-6 months or PSAv > .75 ng/ml/year.
RESULTS: With median follow-up (FU) of 10.1 months, PCA3 was performed in 321/2366 men (13.57%), 289 at first visit and 32 during FU. All 110 PCA3+ men (34.3%) were biopsied and PCa was identified in 43 men in IBx (39.1%). In the randomized arm, 110 were observed and 101 underwent biopsy, finding 12 PCa (11.9%), showing a statistically significant reduction of PCa detection rate in this cohort (P<.001). Global PCa detection rates were 40.9% and 9.5% for the PCA3+ and PCA3- branches, respectively (P<.001). Area under the curve for PSA and PCA3 were .601 and .74, respectively. This is an ongoing prospective study limited by its short follow-up period and still limited enrolment.
CONCLUSIONS: PCA3 as a second line biomarker within an opportunistic dual screening protocol, can potentially avoid 65.7% and 50.1% biopsies at first round and at median FU of 10.1 months, respectively, just missing around 3.2% of high grade PCa.
Copyright © 2013 AEU. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsia prostática; Cribado; Cáncer de próstata; PCA3; Prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer; Screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24169211     DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2013.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Actas Urol Esp        ISSN: 0210-4806            Impact factor:   0.994


  4 in total

Review 1.  When prostate cancer remains undetectable: The dilemma.

Authors:  Mahmoud Othman Mustafa; Louis Pisters
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-03

Review 2.  Screening and Detection of Prostate Cancer-Review of Literature and Current Perspective.

Authors:  Ananthakrishnan Sivaraman; Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam Bhat
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-01-23

3.  MicroRNA-940 as a Potential Serum Biomarker for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Smrithi Rajendiran; Sayantan Maji; Ahmed Haddad; Yair Lotan; Rajesh R Nandy; Jamboor K Vishwanatha; Pankaj Chaudhary
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Diagnosis accuracy of PCA3 level in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Qin; Jianxiang Yao; Luwei Xu; Zheng Xu; Yuzheng Ge; Liuhua Zhou; Feng Zhao; Ruipeng Jia
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.050

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.