OBJECTIVE: To examine (i) the association of percentage of total energy intake from protein (protein intake %) with bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm2) and bone loss at the femoral neck, trochanter and lumbar spine (L2-L4) and (ii) Ca as an effect modifier. SETTING: The Framingham Offspring Study. SUBJECTS: Men (n 1280) and women (n 1639) completed an FFQ in 1992-1995 or 1995-1998 and underwent baseline BMD measurement by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in 1996-2000. Men (n 495) and women (n 680) had follow-up BMD measured in 2002-2005. DESIGN: Cohort study using multivariable regression to examine the association of protein intake % with each BMD, adjusting for covariates. Statistical interaction between protein intake % and Ca (total, dietary, supplemental) intake was examined. RESULTS: The mean age at baseline was 61 (sd 9) years. In the cross-sectional analyses, protein intake % was positively associated with all BMD sites (P range: 0·02-0·04) in women but not in men. Significant interactions were observed with total Ca intake (<800 mg/d v. ≥800 mg/d) in women at all bone sites (P range: 0·002-0·02). Upon stratification, protein intake % was positively associated with all BMD sites (P range: 0·04-0·10) in women with low Ca intakes but not in those with high Ca intakes. In the longitudinal analyses, in men, higher protein intake % was associated with more bone loss at the trochanter (P = 0·01) while no associations were seen in women, regardless of Ca intake. CONCLUSIONS: This suggests that greater protein intake benefits women especially those with lower Ca intakes. However, protein effects are not significant for short-term changes in bone density. Contrastingly, in men, higher protein intakes lead to greater bone loss at the trochanter. Longer follow-up is required to examine the impact of protein on bone loss.
OBJECTIVE: To examine (i) the association of percentage of total energy intake from protein (protein intake %) with bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm2) and bone loss at the femoral neck, trochanter and lumbar spine (L2-L4) and (ii) Ca as an effect modifier. SETTING: The Framingham Offspring Study. SUBJECTS:Men (n 1280) and women (n 1639) completed an FFQ in 1992-1995 or 1995-1998 and underwent baseline BMD measurement by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in 1996-2000. Men (n 495) and women (n 680) had follow-up BMD measured in 2002-2005. DESIGN: Cohort study using multivariable regression to examine the association of protein intake % with each BMD, adjusting for covariates. Statistical interaction between protein intake % and Ca (total, dietary, supplemental) intake was examined. RESULTS: The mean age at baseline was 61 (sd 9) years. In the cross-sectional analyses, protein intake % was positively associated with all BMD sites (P range: 0·02-0·04) in women but not in men. Significant interactions were observed with total Ca intake (<800 mg/d v. ≥800 mg/d) in women at all bone sites (P range: 0·002-0·02). Upon stratification, protein intake % was positively associated with all BMD sites (P range: 0·04-0·10) in women with low Ca intakes but not in those with high Ca intakes. In the longitudinal analyses, in men, higher protein intake % was associated with more bone loss at the trochanter (P = 0·01) while no associations were seen in women, regardless of Ca intake. CONCLUSIONS: This suggests that greater protein intake benefits women especially those with lower Ca intakes. However, protein effects are not significant for short-term changes in bone density. Contrastingly, in men, higher protein intakes lead to greater bone loss at the trochanter. Longer follow-up is required to examine the impact of protein on bone loss.
Authors: Joanne H E Promislow; Deborah Goodman-Gruen; Donald J Slymen; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2002-04-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Elizabeth J Samelson; Yuqing Zhang; Douglas P Kiel; Marian T Hannan; David T Felson Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: C Cooper; Z A Cole; C R Holroyd; S C Earl; N C Harvey; E M Dennison; L J Melton; S R Cummings; J A Kanis Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2011-04-02 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Shivani Sahni; Kelsey M Mangano; Robert R McLean; Marian T Hannan; Douglas P Kiel Journal: Curr Osteoporos Rep Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 5.096
Authors: Zhaoli Dai; Yuqing Zhang; Na Lu; David T Felson; Douglas P Kiel; Shivani Sahni Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2017-11-07 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Donald K Layman; Tracy G Anthony; Blake B Rasmussen; Sean H Adams; Christopher J Lynch; Grant D Brinkworth; Teresa A Davis Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Antonio Juan; Guillem Frontera; Ana Paula Cacheda; Inmaculada Ros; Javier Narváez; Bartolomé Marí; Joan Miquel Nolla Journal: Mediterr J Rheumatol Date: 2020-03-31