Literature DB >> 24168901

Comparison of piezosurgery and conventional rotative instruments in direct sinus lifting.

Cagri Delilbasi1, Gokhan Gurler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the intraoperative and postoperative effects of Piezosurgery and conventional rotative instruments in direct sinus lifting procedure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients requiring direct sinus lifting were enrolled. The osteotomy and sinus membrane elevation were performed either with Piezosurgery tips or rotative diamond burs and manual membrane elevators. Time elapsed between bony window opening and completion of membrane elevation (duration), incidence of membrane perforation, visibility of the operation site, postoperative pain, swelling, sleeping, eating, phonetics, daily routine, and missed work as well as patient's expectation before and experience after the operation were evaluated.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between Piezosurgery and conventional groups regarding incidence of membrane perforation, duration, and operation site visibility as well as patient's expectation before and experience after the operation (P > 0.05). However, there were significantly more pain and swelling in the conventional group compared with the Piezosurgery group (P ≤ 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Sinus lifting procedure performed with Piezosurgery causes less pain and swelling postoperatively compared with conventional technique. Patients' daily life activities and experience about the operation are not affected from the surgical technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24168901     DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Implant Dent        ISSN: 1056-6163            Impact factor:   2.454


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of piezosurgery and conventional rotary instruments in schneider's membrane sinus lifting: A pilot randomized trial.

Authors:  Marcio Martins; Walbert-de Andrade Vieira; Luiz-Renato Paranhos; Rogério-Heládio-Lopes Motta; Carlos-Eduardo-Xavier-Dos Santos-Ribeiro da Silva; Carvalho Rodriguez; Juliana-Cama Ramacciato
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-08-01

2.  Piezotome Versus Surgical Bur: Which is More Effective in Reducing the Postoperative Pain and Edema Following Open Sinus Lift Surgery?

Authors:  Reza Shahakbari; Ali Labafchi; Saba Salami; Sahand Samieirad
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-06-12

3.  [Piezosurgery for surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion under local anesthesia].

Authors:  Hao Sun; Biao Li; Hao Sun; Zhixu Liu; Xudong Wang
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2014-08

4.  A comparative evaluation of bone regeneration using mesenchymal stem cells versus blood coagulum in sinus augmentation procedures.

Authors:  Akash Sanjay Gupta; Jitender Kumar Aurora; K N Dubey; Himanshu Chauhan; Mohit Saxena; Sagar Ramesh Ganvir
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-12-13

Review 5.  The bone lid technique in lateral sinus lift: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lucia Schiavon; Alessandro Perini; Giulia Brunello; Giada Ferrante; Massimo Del Fabbro; Daniele Botticelli; Fouad Khoury; Stefano Sivolella
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-08-29

6.  Patient-reported outcomes and complication rates after lateral maxillary sinus floor elevation: a prospective study.

Authors:  Carlo Rengo; Antonino Fiorino; Alessandro Cucchi; Antonio Nappo; Emanuele Randellini; Paolo Calamai; Marco Ferrari
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 7.  Piezosurgery in implant dentistry.

Authors:  Stefan Stübinger; Andres Stricker; Britt-Isabelle Berg
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2015-11-11

Review 8.  Membrane perforation rate in lateral maxillary sinus floor augmentation using conventional rotating instruments and piezoelectric device-a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Corinne Jordi; Khaled Mukaddam; Jörg Thomas Lambrecht; Sebastian Kühl
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2018-01-29

9.  Short Implants and Conventional Implants in The Residual Maxillary Alveolar Ridge: A 36-Month Follow-Up Observation.

Authors:  Jakub Hadzik; Maciej Krawiec; Paweł Kubasiewicz-Ross; Agata Prylińska-Czyżewska; Tomasz Gedrange; Marzena Dominiak
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-08-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.