PURPOSE: An association between birth order and reduced unaided vision (a surrogate for myopia) has been observed previously. We examined the association between birth order and myopia directly in four subject groups. METHODS: Subject groups were participants in (1) the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC; UK; age 15 years; N = 4401), (2) the Singapore Cohort Study of Risk Factors for Myopia (SCORM; Singapore; age 13 years; N = 1959), (3) the Raine Eye Health Study (REHS; Australia; age 20 years; N = 1344), and (4) Israeli Defense Force Pre-recruitment Candidates (IDFC; Israel; age 16-22 years; N = 888,277). The main outcome was odds ratios (OR) for myopia in first-born versus non-first-born individuals after adjusting for potential risk factors. RESULTS: The prevalence of myopia was numerically higher in first-born versus non-first-born individuals in all study groups, but the strength of evidence varied widely. Adjusted ORs (95% confidence intervals, CIs) were: ALSPAC, 1.31 (1.05-1.64); SCORM, 1.25 (0.89-1.77); REHS, 1.18 (0.90-1.55); and IDFC, 1.04 (1.03-1.06). In the large IDFC sample, the effect size was greater (a) for the first-born versus fourth- or higher-born comparison than for the first-born versus second/third-born comparison (p < 0.001) and (b) with increasing myopia severity (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Across all studies, the increased risk of myopia in first-born individuals was low (OR < 1.3). Indeed, only the studies with >4000 participants provided strong statistical support for the association. The available evidence suggested the relationship was independent of established risk factors such as time outdoors/reading, and thus may arise through a different causal mechanism.
PURPOSE: An association between birth order and reduced unaided vision (a surrogate for myopia) has been observed previously. We examined the association between birth order and myopia directly in four subject groups. METHODS: Subject groups were participants in (1) the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC; UK; age 15 years; N = 4401), (2) the Singapore Cohort Study of Risk Factors for Myopia (SCORM; Singapore; age 13 years; N = 1959), (3) the Raine Eye Health Study (REHS; Australia; age 20 years; N = 1344), and (4) Israeli Defense Force Pre-recruitment Candidates (IDFC; Israel; age 16-22 years; N = 888,277). The main outcome was odds ratios (OR) for myopia in first-born versus non-first-born individuals after adjusting for potential risk factors. RESULTS: The prevalence of myopia was numerically higher in first-born versus non-first-born individuals in all study groups, but the strength of evidence varied widely. Adjusted ORs (95% confidence intervals, CIs) were: ALSPAC, 1.31 (1.05-1.64); SCORM, 1.25 (0.89-1.77); REHS, 1.18 (0.90-1.55); and IDFC, 1.04 (1.03-1.06). In the large IDFC sample, the effect size was greater (a) for the first-born versus fourth- or higher-born comparison than for the first-born versus second/third-born comparison (p < 0.001) and (b) with increasing myopia severity (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Across all studies, the increased risk of myopia in first-born individuals was low (OR < 1.3). Indeed, only the studies with >4000 participants provided strong statistical support for the association. The available evidence suggested the relationship was independent of established risk factors such as time outdoors/reading, and thus may arise through a different causal mechanism.
Authors: Seang-Mei Saw; Say-Beng Tan; Daniel Fung; Kee-Seng Chia; David Koh; Donald T H Tan; Richard A Stone Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: M Dirani; L Tong; G Gazzard; X Zhang; A Chia; T L Young; K A Rose; P Mitchell; S-M Saw Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2009-02-11 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Jenny M Ip; Seang-Mei Saw; Kathryn A Rose; Ian G Morgan; Annette Kifley; Jie Jin Wang; Paul Mitchell Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Alicja R Rudnicka; Christopher G Owen; Marcus Richards; Michael E J Wadsworth; David P Strachan Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Wei Jie Seow; Cheryl S Ngo; Hong Pan; Veluchamy Amutha Barathi; Stuart W Tompson; Kristina N Whisenhunt; Eranga Vithana; Yap-Seng Chong; Suh-Hang H Juo; Pirro Hysi; Terri L Young; Neerja Karnani; Seang Mei Saw Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-05-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lan Wang; Maolin Du; He Yi; Shengyun Duan; Wenfang Guo; Peng Qin; Zhihui Hao; Juan Sun Journal: BMC Ophthalmol Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 2.209
Authors: Samantha Sze-Yee Lee; Gareth Lingham; Seyhan Yazar; Paul G Sanfilippo; Jason Charng; Fred K Chen; Alex W Hewitt; Fletcher Ng; Christopher Hammond; Leon M Straker; Peter R Eastwood; Stuart MacGregor; Kathryn A Rose; Robyn M Lucas; Jeremy A Guggenheim; Seang-Mei Saw; Minas T Coroneo; Mingguang He; David A Mackey Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-03-25 Impact factor: 2.692