Literature DB >> 24168304

Association between subcutaneous fat thickness measured on thoracic radiographs and body condition score in dogs.

Deborah E Linder1, Lisa M Freeman, James Sutherland-Smith.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether subcutaneous fat thickness measured on thoracic radiographs was associated with body condition score (BCS) in dogs. Animals-87 client-owned dogs (41 males and 46 females) with a median age of 10.0 years (range, 1 to 16 years) and median weight of 20.3 kg (range, 3.1 to 58.0 kg). PROCEDURES: Age, sex, body weight, and breed were recorded. Body condition scores (scale from 1 to 9) and muscle condition scores were assigned by a single investigator. Subcutaneous fat thickness was measured at the level of the eighth rib head on a dorsoventral or ventrodorsal radiographic view of the thorax by a single investigator. Ratios of subcutaneous fat thickness to the width of the midbody of T8 on the ventrodorsal or dorsoventral radiographic view (T8 ratio) and to the length of the midbody of T4 on a right lateral radiographic view (T4 ratio) were calculated and compared with BCS by means of the Spearman correlation method.
RESULTS: Median BCS was 6 (range, 1 to 9), and all muscle condition scores were represented. There were significant correlations between BCS and T4 ratio (r = 0.86) and between BCS and T8 ratio (r = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results indicated that in this population, there was a significant association between BCS and subcutaneous fat thickness measured on thoracic radiographs. Findings suggested that measuring subcutaneous fat thickness could aid in the retrospective assignment of BCS in studies involving dogs in which BCS was not recorded in the medical record.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24168304      PMCID: PMC7877550          DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.74.11.1400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Vet Res        ISSN: 0002-9645            Impact factor:   1.156


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of various methods for estimating body fat in dogs.

Authors:  Dianne I Mawby; Joseph W Bartges; Andre d'Avignon; Dorothy P Laflamme; Tamberlyn D Moyers; Tamorah Cottrell
Journal:  J Am Anim Hosp Assoc       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.023

2.  AAHA nutritional assessment guidelines for dogs and cats.

Authors:  Kimberly Baldwin; Joe Bartges; Tony Buffington; Lisa M Freeman; Mary Grabow; Julie Legred; Donald Ostwald
Journal:  J Am Anim Hosp Assoc       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.023

3.  Use of starting condition score to estimate changes in body weight and composition during weight loss in obese dogs.

Authors:  A J German; S L Holden; T Bissot; P J Morris; V Biourge
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 2.534

4.  Correlation of cardiac enlargement as assessed by vertebral heart size and echocardiographic and electrocardiographic findings in dogs with evolving cardiomegaly due to rapid ventricular pacing.

Authors:  H Nakayama; T Nakayama; R L Hamlin
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Computed tomographic assessment of body fat in beagles.

Authors:  Katsumi Ishioka; Masahiro Okumura; Mayumi Sagawa; Fumio Nakadomo; Kazuhiro Kimura; Masayuki Saito
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.363

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  In vivo assessment of subcutaneous fat in dogs by real-time ultrasonography and image analysis.

Authors:  Rita Payan-Carreira; Luis Martins; Sónia Miranda; Pedro Olivério; Severiano R Silva
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 1.695

2.  Body fat assessment by computed tomography and radiography in normal Beagle dogs.

Authors:  Doyeon Kim; Daji Noh; Taeho Oh; Kija Lee
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 1.267

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.