Literature DB >> 24167678

Cost-effectiveness of ethyl-eicosapentaenoic acid in the treatment of bipolar disorder.

Nadir Cheema1, Sophia Frangou, Paul McCrone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study develops an economic model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ethyl-eicosapentaenoic acid (ethyl-EPA) as an adjunct treatment of bipolar I disorder.
METHODS: A 1-year Markov model is used incorporating three health states: euthymic, manic and depressive. The model was populated using outcomes from a clinical trial on clinical efficacy and other published literature.
RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) of ethyl-EPA in comparison with placebo was estimated to be -£2,782 in 2008/09 prices, the negative ICER indicating ethyl-EPA to be a more effective and less costly treatment option than placebo in terms of cost savings of other resource use.
CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity analysis indicated that the results were robust. Future research covering a longer time period using broader costs of the disease will be required to consolidate these findings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bipolar; Markov model; cost-effectiveness; ethyl-eicosapentaenoic acid (ethyl-EPA)

Year:  2013        PMID: 24167678      PMCID: PMC3805392          DOI: 10.1177/2045125312464105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Adv Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 2045-1253


  11 in total

Review 1.  One thousand health-related quality-of-life estimates.

Authors:  T O Tengs; A Wallace
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Annual cost of bipolar disorder to UK society.

Authors:  Roben Das Gupta; Julian F Guest
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.319

3.  A rating scale for depression.

Authors:  M HAMILTON
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1960-02       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  The cost-effectiveness of lamotrigine in the maintenance treatment of adults with bipolar I disorder.

Authors:  Neill W Calvert; Steven P Burch; Alex Z Fu; Penny Reeves; Thomas R Thompson
Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm       Date:  2006-05

5.  Patient-based utilities for bipolar disorder-related health states.

Authors:  Dennis A Revicki; Jennifer Hanlon; Silas Martin; Laszlo Gyulai; S Nassir Ghaemi; Frances Lynch; Sally Mannix; Leah Kleinman
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.839

6.  Cost effectiveness of olanzapine in prevention of affective episodes in bipolar disorder in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  J McKendrick; K H Cerri; A Lloyd; A D'Ausilio; S Dando; C Chinn
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 4.153

7.  Efficacy of ethyl-eicosapentaenoic acid in bipolar depression: randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Sophia Frangou; Michael Lewis; Paul McCrone
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 9.319

8.  Cost-effectiveness of quetiapine plus mood stabilizers compared with mood stabilizers alone in the maintenance therapy of bipolar I disorder: results of a Markov model analysis.

Authors:  Liberty Fajutrao; Björn Paulsson; Sherry Liu; Julie Locklear
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 9.  A rapid and systematic review and economic evaluation of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of newer drugs for treatment of mania associated with bipolar affective disorder.

Authors:  C Bridle; S Palmer; A-M Bagnall; J Darba; S Duffy; M Sculpher; R Riemsma
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 10.  A systematic review and economic model of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions for preventing relapse in people with bipolar disorder.

Authors:  K Soares-Weiser; Y Bravo Vergel; S Beynon; G Dunn; M Barbieri; S Duffy; J Geddes; S Gilbody; S Palmer; N Woolacott
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.014

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The estimation of utility weights in cost-utility analysis for mental disorders: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael Sonntag; Hans-Helmut König; Alexander Konnopka
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  A Promising Approach to Optimizing Sequential Treatment Decisions for Depression: Markov Decision Process.

Authors:  Fang Li; Frederike Jörg; Xinyu Li; Talitha Feenstra
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 4.558

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.