BACKGROUND: Adherence to chronic therapy is a key determinant of patient health outcomes in chronic disease. However, only about 50 % of patients adhere to chronic therapy. One of the challenges in promoting adherence is having an accurate understanding of adherence rates and the factors that contribute to non-adherence. There are many measures available to assess patient medication adherence. AIM OF THE REVIEW: This review aims to present the commonly used indirect methods available for measuring medication adherence in routine healthcare and research studies. METHOD: A literature review on medication adherence measures in patient populations with chronic conditions taking chronic medications was conducted through Medline (2003-2013). A complementary manual search of references cited in the retrieved studies was performed in order to identify any additional studies. RESULTS: Of the 238 initial Medline search results, 57 full texts were retrieved. Forty-seven articles were included as a result of the manual search. Adherence measures identified were: self-report (reported in 50 publications), electronic measures (33), pharmacy refills and claims data (26) and pill counts (25). Patient self-report, electronic measures, pharmacy refill and claims data were the most commonly used measures of adherence in research, routine practice, epidemiological and intervention studies. These methods, and their strengths and limitations have been described in this paper. CONCLUSION: A multitude of indirect measures of adherence exist in the literature, however, there is no "gold" standard for measuring adherence to medications. Triangulation of methods increases the validity and reliability of the adherence data collected. To strengthen the adherence data collected and allow for comparison of data, future research and practice interventions should use an internationally accepted, operational standardized definition of medication adherence and clearly describe the medication adherence methods used.
BACKGROUND: Adherence to chronic therapy is a key determinant of patient health outcomes in chronic disease. However, only about 50 % of patients adhere to chronic therapy. One of the challenges in promoting adherence is having an accurate understanding of adherence rates and the factors that contribute to non-adherence. There are many measures available to assess patient medication adherence. AIM OF THE REVIEW: This review aims to present the commonly used indirect methods available for measuring medication adherence in routine healthcare and research studies. METHOD: A literature review on medication adherence measures in patient populations with chronic conditions taking chronic medications was conducted through Medline (2003-2013). A complementary manual search of references cited in the retrieved studies was performed in order to identify any additional studies. RESULTS: Of the 238 initial Medline search results, 57 full texts were retrieved. Forty-seven articles were included as a result of the manual search. Adherence measures identified were: self-report (reported in 50 publications), electronic measures (33), pharmacy refills and claims data (26) and pill counts (25). Patient self-report, electronic measures, pharmacy refill and claims data were the most commonly used measures of adherence in research, routine practice, epidemiological and intervention studies. These methods, and their strengths and limitations have been described in this paper. CONCLUSION: A multitude of indirect measures of adherence exist in the literature, however, there is no "gold" standard for measuring adherence to medications. Triangulation of methods increases the validity and reliability of the adherence data collected. To strengthen the adherence data collected and allow for comparison of data, future research and practice interventions should use an internationally accepted, operational standardized definition of medication adherence and clearly describe the medication adherence methods used.
Authors: Sheila M Greenlaw; Brad A Yentzer; Jenna L O'Neill; Rajesh Balkrishnan; Steven R Feldman Journal: Skin Res Technol Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 2.365
Authors: Paul A Nakonezny; Carroll W Hughes; Taryn L Mayes; Kathryn H Sternweis-Yang; Betsy D Kennard; Matthew J Byerly; Graham J Emslie Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 2.576
Authors: Eric J MacLaughlin; Cynthia L Raehl; Angela K Treadway; Teresa L Sterling; Dennis P Zoller; Chester A Bond Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2005 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: Martha Sajatovic; Dawn I Velligan; Peter J Weiden; Marcia A Valenstein; Gbenga Ogedegbe Journal: J Psychosom Res Date: 2009-07-25 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Yelena P Wu; David D Stenehjem; Lauri A Linder; Bin Yu; Bridget Grahmann Parsons; Ryan Mooney; Mark N Fluchel Journal: J Pediatr Oncol Nurs Date: 2017-11-30 Impact factor: 1.636
Authors: Megan Hoopes; Heather Angier; Lewis A Raynor; Andrew Suchocki; John Muench; Miguel Marino; Pedro Rivera; Nathalie Huguet Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Reham Almardini; Esra' O Taybeh; Mervat M Alsous; Ahmed F Hawwa; Karl McKeever; Rob Horne; James C McElnay Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2019-05-11 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Marine Solano; Etienne Daguindau; Cyril Faure; Pierre Loriod; Coline Pain; Anne-Cécile Maes; Pauline Marguet; Marie Kroemer; Anne Rumpler; Jean Fontan; Eric Deconinck; Samuel Limat; Anne-Laure Clairet Journal: Ann Hematol Date: 2021-05-03 Impact factor: 3.673
Authors: Jennifer L Glick; Aimee Huang; Rienna Russo; Belinda Jivapong; Vijayasundaram Ramasamy; Lori Rosman; Danielle Pelaez; Katherine H A Footer; Susan G Sherman Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2020-08-02 Impact factor: 4.492