Objective: Medication adherence is an important aspect of chronic disease management. Electronic health record (EHR) data are often not linked to dispensing data, limiting clinicians' understanding of which of their patients fill their medications, and how to tailor care appropriately. We aimed to develop an algorithm to link EHR prescribing to claims-based dispensing data and use the results to quantify how often patients with diabetes filled prescribed chronic disease medications. Materials and Methods: We developed an algorithm linking EHR prescribing data (RxNorm terminology) to claims-based dispensing data (NDC terminology), within sample of adult (19-64) community health center (CHC) patients with diabetes from a network of CHCs across 12 states. We demonstrate an application of the method by calculating dispense rates for a set of commonly prescribed diabetes and cardio-protective medications. To further inform clinical care, we computed adjusted odds ratios of dispense by patient-, encounter-, and clinic-level characteristics. Results: Seventy-six percent of cardio-protective medication prescriptions and 74% of diabetes medications were linked to a dispensing record. Age, income, ethnicity, insurance, assigned primary care provider, comorbidity, time on EHR, and clinic size were significantly associated with odds of dispensing. Discussion: EHR prescriptions and pharmacy dispense data can be linked at the record level across different terminologies. Dispensing rates in this low-income population with diabetes were similar to other populations. Conclusion: Record linkage resulted in the finding that CHC patients with diabetes largely had their chronic disease medications dispensed. Understanding factors associated with dispensing rates highlight barriers and opportunities for optimal disease management.
Objective: Medication adherence is an important aspect of chronic disease management. Electronic health record (EHR) data are often not linked to dispensing data, limiting clinicians' understanding of which of their patients fill their medications, and how to tailor care appropriately. We aimed to develop an algorithm to link EHR prescribing to claims-based dispensing data and use the results to quantify how often patients with diabetes filled prescribed chronic disease medications. Materials and Methods: We developed an algorithm linking EHR prescribing data (RxNorm terminology) to claims-based dispensing data (NDC terminology), within sample of adult (19-64) community health center (CHC) patients with diabetes from a network of CHCs across 12 states. We demonstrate an application of the method by calculating dispense rates for a set of commonly prescribed diabetes and cardio-protective medications. To further inform clinical care, we computed adjusted odds ratios of dispense by patient-, encounter-, and clinic-level characteristics. Results: Seventy-six percent of cardio-protective medication prescriptions and 74% of diabetes medications were linked to a dispensing record. Age, income, ethnicity, insurance, assigned primary care provider, comorbidity, time on EHR, and clinic size were significantly associated with odds of dispensing. Discussion: EHR prescriptions and pharmacy dispense data can be linked at the record level across different terminologies. Dispensing rates in this low-income population with diabetes were similar to other populations. Conclusion: Record linkage resulted in the finding that CHCpatients with diabetes largely had their chronic disease medications dispensed. Understanding factors associated with dispensing rates highlight barriers and opportunities for optimal disease management.
Authors: Himali Saitwal; David Qing; Stephen Jones; Elmer V Bernstam; Christopher G Chute; Todd R Johnson Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Michael A Fischer; Niteesh K Choudhry; Gregory Brill; Jerry Avorn; Sebastian Schneeweiss; David Hutchins; Joshua N Liberman; Troyen A Brennan; William H Shrank Journal: Am J Med Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Amir Qaseem; Michael J Barry; Linda L Humphrey; Mary Ann Forciea; Nick Fitterman; Carrie Horwitch; Devan Kansagara; Robert M McLean; Timothy J Wilt Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Julie C Lauffenburger; Akhila Balasubramanian; Joel F Farley; Cathy W Critchlow; Cynthia D O'Malley; Mary T Roth; Virginia Pate; M Alan Brookhart Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2013-05-21 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Nathalie Huguet; Heather Angier; Miguel Marino; K John McConnell; Megan J Hoopes; Jean P O'Malley; Lewis A Raynor; Sonja Likumahuwa-Ackman; Heather Holderness; Jennifer E DeVoe Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Sally L Baxter; Charles Marks; Tsung-Ting Kuo; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Robert N Weinreb Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2019-07-16 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Holly Tibble; James Lay-Flurrie; Aziz Sheikh; Rob Horne; Mehrdad A Mizani; Athanasios Tsanas Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2020-12-10 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Jennifer M Poger; Victoria Mayer; Obidiugwu Kenrik Duru; Beth Nauman; Heather Holderness; Nate Warren; Carolina Vasquez; Salma Bibi; Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik; Zahra Hosseinian; Lizheng Shi; Jamie Wallace; Crispin N Goytia; Carol R Horowitz; Jennifer L Kraschnewski Journal: Med Care Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 3.178
Authors: Van C Willis; Kelly Jean Thomas Craig; Yalda Jabbarpour; Elisabeth L Scheufele; Yull E Arriaga; Monica Ajinkya; Kyu B Rhee; Andrew Bazemore Journal: JMIR Med Inform Date: 2022-01-21