Shannon John Morales 1 , Carol A Bodian , Susan Kornacki , Robert V Rouse , Robert Petras , Nicholas A Rouse , Lawrence B Cohen , Neville D Bamji , Kenneth M Miller , Roy M Soetikno , Tonya Kaltenbach , James Aisenberg Show Affiliations »
Abstract
Show RCT »
Hide RCT «
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Surveillance intervals after colonoscopic resection of serrated polyps are partially predicated on the histology of the polyp(s) removed during the index exam. Histologic discrimination between sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/P) and hyperplastic polyps is challenging. We devised and tested a simple tool--an envelope--that gastroenterologists can integrate into routine colonoscopy practice to address this problem. METHODS: In the "modified protocol," immediately after polypectomy each serrated polyp was flattened and enclosed in a paper envelope before being placed in formalin. In the pathology laboratory, each polyp was sectioned after processing. A two-site, prospective, randomized, single-blinded trial was performed to compare this modified protocol with the conventional protocol. Serrated polyps located proximal to the splenic flexure and 5-20 mm in diameter were included. A novel orientation score that measured the number of well-oriented crypts per unit area of polyp (higher orientation score = better orientation) was validated. Orientation score, SSA/P diagnosis rate, and inter-pathologist agreement were measured. RESULTS: A total of 375 polyps were enrolled, of which 264 were identified for analysis . The mean orientation scores in the modified and conventional protocol groups were 3.11 and 1.13, respectively (P < 0.0001). SSA/Ps were diagnosed in 103/135 cases (76.3%) in the modified protocol group vs. 54/129 (41.9%) in the conventional protocol group (P < 0.0001). Inter-pathologist agreement was higher with the modified than the conventional protocol (77.0% vs. 62.8%; P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Standard polyp handling techniques may be sub-optimal for interpretation of serrated polyps resected at colonoscopy, and may lead to inadvertent histologic "under-grading" of many lesions. Our intervention improved histopathologic interpretation and increased the SSA/P diagnosis rate. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
RCT Entities: Population
Interventions
Outcomes
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Surveillance intervals after colonoscopic resection of serrated polyps are partially predicated on the histology of the polyp(s) removed during the index exam. Histologic discrimination between sessile serrated adenomas /polyps (SSA/P) and hyperplastic polyps is challenging. We devised and tested a simple tool--an envelope--that gastroenterologists can integrate into routine colonoscopy practice to address this problem. METHODS: In the "modified protocol," immediately after polypectomy each serrated polyp was flattened and enclosed in a paper envelope before being placed in formalin . In the pathology laboratory, each polyp was sectioned after processing. A two-site, prospective, randomized, single-blinded trial was performed to compare this modified protocol with the conventional protocol. Serrated polyps located proximal to the splenic flexure and 5-20 mm in diameter were included. A novel orientation score that measured the number of well-oriented crypts per unit area of polyp (higher orientation score = better orientation) was validated. Orientation score, SSA/P diagnosis rate, and inter-pathologist agreement were measured. RESULTS: A total of 375 polyps were enrolled, of which 264 were identified for analysis. The mean orientation scores in the modified and conventional protocol groups were 3.11 and 1.13, respectively (P < 0.0001). SSA/Ps were diagnosed in 103/135 cases (76.3%) in the modified protocol group vs. 54/129 (41.9%) in the conventional protocol group (P < 0.0001). Inter-pathologist agreement was higher with the modified than the conventional protocol (77.0% vs. 62.8%; P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Standard polyp handling techniques may be sub-optimal for interpretation of serrated polyps resected at colonoscopy, and may lead to inadvertent histologic "under-grading" of many lesions. Our intervention improved histopathologic interpretation and increased the SSA/P diagnosis rate. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Entities: Chemical
Disease
Mesh： See more »
Year: 2013
PMID： 24165815 DOI： 10.1055/s-0033-1344435
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Endoscopy ISSN： 0013-726X Impact factor: 10.093