Literature DB >> 24165587

Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database in 19,100 patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction: complication rates with acellular dermal matrix.

Ahmed M S Ibrahim1, Marina Shuster, Pieter G L Koolen, Kuylhee Kim, Amir H Taghinia, Hani H Sinno, Bernard T Lee, Samuel J Lin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of acellular dermal matrices has become increasingly popular in immediate and delayed tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction. However, it is unclear whether their use is associated with increased postoperative complication rates. Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, the authors assessed baseline differences in demographics and comorbidities with and without acellular dermal matrix and determined whether postoperative complication rates varied.
METHODS: Using the national surgical database (2005 to 2011), tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction cases were extracted using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Differences in preoperative demographics and comorbidities were assessed using chi-square and t test analysis using SPSS. The authors analyzed variations in complication rates and determined whether demographics and comorbidities affected outcomes using multivariate logistical analysis. A post hoc power study was calculated.
RESULTS: Of 19,100 cases, 3301 involved acellular dermal matrix use. Overall complication rates were not statistically significant (acellular dermal matrix, 5.3 percent; non-acellular dermal matrix, 4.9 percent; p=0.396). Several risk factors were statistically significant associated factors of complications. Higher body mass index was associated with wound complications in both cohorts. In the non-acellular dermal matrix group, body mass index, smoking, and diabetes were associated with major complications, and radiotherapy and steroid use with minor complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Acellular dermal matrix use did not appear to increase complication rates in tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction in this survey of a national surgical database. There was no significant difference in complication rates between the acellular dermal matrix and non-acellular dermal matrix groups. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24165587     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a3beec

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  23 in total

Review 1.  Current opinions on indications and algorithms for acellular dermal matrix use in primary prosthetic breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael M Vu; John Y S Kim
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-06

2.  Acceleration of osteogenesis by platelet-rich plasma with acellular dermal matrix in a calvarial defect model.

Authors:  Woon Hyeok Jeong; Tai Suk Roh; Young Seok Kim; Eun Hye Kang; Bok Ki Jung; Won Jai Lee; Dae Hyun Lew; In Sik Yun
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Feasibility of Implementing a Breast Reconstruction Database.

Authors:  Connor R McGuire; Laura Allen; Martin R LeBlanc
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 0.947

Review 4.  Scoping Review of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in Plastic Surgery Research.

Authors:  Haley F M Augustine; Jiayi Hu; Zainab Najarali; Matthew McRae
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 0.947

5.  Acellular Dermal Matrix in Reconstructive Breast Surgery: Survey of Current Practice among Plastic Surgeons.

Authors:  Ahmed M S Ibrahim; Pieter G L Koolen; Azra A Ashraf; Kuylhee Kim; Marc A M Mureau; Bernard T Lee; Samuel J Lin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-05-07

6.  Tissue Reinforcement in Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael Scheflan; Amy S Colwell
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-09-08

Review 7.  Acellular dermal matrices and radiotherapy in breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Luigi Valdatta; Anna Giulia Cattaneo; Igor Pellegatta; Stefano Scamoni; Anna Minuti; Mario Cherubino
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2014-05-21

8.  A systematic review of infection rates and associated antibiotic duration in acellular dermal matrix breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Brett T Phillips; Muath Bishawi; Alexander B Dagum; Duc T Bui; Sami U Khan
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2014-11-11

Review 9.  Biological and synthetic mesh use in breast reconstructive surgery: a literature review.

Authors:  Hugh Logan Ellis; Oluwatosin Asaolu; Vivien Nebo; Abdul Kasem
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Deepithelialization and Extended Dermal Apposition: A Technique for Closure of High-risk Incisions in Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Ryan P Cauley; Eric C Liao
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-07-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.