Literature DB >> 24164917

Childhood adversity moderates the effect of ADH1B on risk for alcohol-related phenotypes in Jewish Israeli drinkers.

Jacquelyn L Meyers1, Dvora Shmulewitz, Melanie M Wall, Katherine M Keyes, Efrat Aharonovich, Baruch Spivak, Abraham Weizman, Amos Frisch, Howard J Edenberg, Joel Gelernter, Bridget F Grant, Deborah Hasin.   

Abstract

Childhood adversity and genetic variant ADH1B-rs1229984 have each been shown to influence heavy alcohol consumption and disorders. However, little is known about how these factors jointly influence these outcomes. We assessed the main and additive interactive effects of childhood adversity (abuse, neglect and parental divorce) and the ADH1B-rs1229984 on the quantitative phenotypes 'maximum drinks in a day' (Maxdrinks) and DSM-Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) severity, adjusting for demographic variables, in an Israeli sample of adult household residents (n = 1143) evaluated between 2007 and 2009. Childhood adversity and absence of the protective ADH1B-rs1229984 A allele were associated with greater mean Maxdrinks (mean differences: 1.50; 1.13, respectively) and AUD severity (mean ratios: 0.71; 0.27, respectively). In addition, childhood adversity moderated the ADH1B-rs1229984 effect on Maxdrinks (P < 0.01) and AUD severity (P < 0.05), in that there was a stronger effect of ADH1B-rs1229984 genotype on Maxdrinks and AUD severity among those who had experienced childhood adversity compared with those who had not. ADH1B-rs1229984 impacts alcohol metabolism. Therefore, among those at risk for greater consumption, e.g. those who experienced childhood adversity, ADH1B-rs1229984 appears to have a stronger effect on alcohol consumption and consequently on risk for AUD symptom severity. Evidence for the interaction of genetic vulnerability and early life adversity on alcohol-related phenotypes provides further insight into the complex relationships between genetic and environmental risk factors.
© 2013 Society for the Study of Addiction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADH1B; Israel; alcohol consumption; alcohol use disorders; childhood adversity; interaction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24164917      PMCID: PMC3999313          DOI: 10.1111/adb.12102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addict Biol        ISSN: 1355-6215            Impact factor:   4.280


  57 in total

1.  Childhood adversity increases risk for nicotine dependence and interacts with α5 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor genotype specifically in males.

Authors:  Pingxing Xie; Henry R Kranzler; Huiping Zhang; David Oslin; Raymond F Anton; Lindsay A Farrer; Joel Gelernter
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 2.  Epidemiology of substance use disorders.

Authors:  Kathleen R Merikangas; Vetisha L McClair
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Modeling the dimensionality of DSM-IV alcohol use disorder criteria in a nationally representative sample of college students.

Authors:  Sarah J Ehlke; Brett T Hagman; Amy M Cohn
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.164

4.  Alcohol use disorders and perceived drinking norms: ethnic differences in Israeli adults.

Authors:  Dvora Shmulewitz; Melanie M Wall; Katherine M Keyes; Efrat Aharonovich; Christina Aivadyan; Eliana Greenstein; Baruch Spivak; Abraham Weizman; Amos Frisch; Deborah Hasin
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.582

5.  Interaction between a functional MAOA locus and childhood sexual abuse predicts alcoholism and antisocial personality disorder in adult women.

Authors:  F Ducci; M-A Enoch; C Hodgkinson; K Xu; M Catena; R W Robin; D Goldman
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 15.992

6.  Association of ADH and ALDH genes with alcohol dependence in the Irish Affected Sib Pair Study of alcohol dependence (IASPSAD) sample.

Authors:  Po-Hsiu Kuo; Gursharan Kalsi; Carol A Prescott; Colin A Hodgkinson; David Goldman; Edwin J van den Oord; Jeffry Alexander; Cizhong Jiang; Patrick F Sullivan; Diana G Patterson; Dermot Walsh; Kenneth S Kendler; Brien P Riley
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 3.455

7.  Profiling of childhood adversity-associated DNA methylation changes in alcoholic patients and healthy controls.

Authors:  Huiping Zhang; Fan Wang; Henry R Kranzler; Hongyu Zhao; Joel Gelernter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  ADH1B is associated with alcohol dependence and alcohol consumption in populations of European and African ancestry.

Authors:  L J Bierut; A M Goate; N Breslau; E O Johnson; S Bertelsen; L Fox; A Agrawal; K K Bucholz; R Grucza; V Hesselbrock; J Kramer; S Kuperman; J Nurnberger; B Porjesz; N L Saccone; M Schuckit; J Tischfield; J C Wang; T Foroud; J P Rice; H J Edenberg
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 15.992

9.  The impact of gene-environment interaction on alcohol use disorders.

Authors:  Danielle M Dick; Kenneth S Kendler
Journal:  Alcohol Res       Date:  2012

10.  Genes encoding enzymes involved in ethanol metabolism.

Authors:  Thomas D Hurley; Howard J Edenberg
Journal:  Alcohol Res       Date:  2012
View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Genetics of Alcoholism.

Authors:  Howard J Edenberg; Joel Gelernter; Arpana Agrawal
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Genomewide Association Study for Maximum Number of Alcoholic Drinks in European Americans and African Americans.

Authors:  Ke Xu; Henry R Kranzler; Richard Sherva; Carolyn E Sartor; Laura Almasy; Ryan Koesterer; Hongyu Zhao; Lindsay A Farrer; Joel Gelernter
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Quantile-Specific Heritability of Intakes of Alcohol but not Other Macronutrients.

Authors:  Paul T Williams
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  The Genetics, Neurogenetics and Pharmacogenetics of Addiction.

Authors:  Catherine H Demers; Ryan Bogdan; Arpana Agrawal
Journal:  Curr Behav Neurosci Rep       Date:  2014-03-01

Review 5.  ADH1B: From alcoholism, natural selection, and cancer to the human phenome.

Authors:  Renato Polimanti; Joel Gelernter
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.568

6.  Examination of associations between early life victimisation and alcohol's harm from others.

Authors:  Lauren M Kaplan; Thomas K Greenfield; Katherine J Karriker-Jaffe
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  2017-08-21

7.  Interaction between ADH1B*3 and alcohol-facilitating social environments in alcohol behaviors among college students of african descent.

Authors:  Jessica M Desalu; Michelle J Zaso; Jueun Kim; John M Belote; Aesoon Park
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2017-06

8.  Interactions Between Alcohol Metabolism Genes and Religious Involvement in Association With Maximum Drinks and Alcohol Dependence Symptoms.

Authors:  Karen G Chartier; Danielle M Dick; Laura Almasy; Grace Chan; Fazil Aliev; Marc A Schuckit; Denise M Scott; John Kramer; Kathleen K Bucholz; Laura J Bierut; John Nurnberger; Bernice Porjesz; Victor M Hesselbrock
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.582

Review 9.  Alcohol Dehydrogenases, Aldehyde Dehydrogenases, and Alcohol Use Disorders: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Howard J Edenberg; Jeanette N McClintick
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2018-11-11       Impact factor: 3.455

10.  Monoacylglycerol lipase (MGLL) polymorphism rs604300 interacts with childhood adversity to predict cannabis dependence symptoms and amygdala habituation: Evidence from an endocannabinoid system-level analysis.

Authors:  Caitlin E Carey; Arpana Agrawal; Bo Zhang; Emily D Conley; Louisa Degenhardt; Andrew C Heath; Daofeng Li; Michael T Lynskey; Nicholas G Martin; Grant W Montgomery; Ting Wang; Laura J Bierut; Ahmad R Hariri; Elliot C Nelson; Ryan Bogdan
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2015-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.