The protonation–reduction of a dioxygen adduct with [LCu(I)][B(C6F5)4], cupric superoxo complex [LCu(II)(O2(•–))]+ (1) (L = TMG3tren (1,1,1-tris[2-[N(2)-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylguanidino)]ethyl]amine)) has been investigated. Trifluoroacetic acid (HOAcF) reversibly associates with the superoxo ligand in ([LCu(II)(O2(•–))]+) in a 1:1 adduct [LCu(II)(O2(•–))(HOAcF)](+) (2), as characterized by UV–visible, resonance Raman (rR), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and X-ray absorption (XAS) spectroscopies, along with density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Chemical studies reveal that for the binding of HOAcF with 1 to give 2, Keq = 1.2 × 10(5) M(–1) (−130 °C) and ΔH° = −6.9(7) kcal/mol, ΔS° = −26(4) cal mol(–1) K(–1)). Vibrational (rR) data reveal a significant increase (29 cm(–1)) in vO–O (= 1149 cm(–1)) compared to that known for [LCu(II)(O2(•–))](+) (1). Along with results obtained from XAS and DFT calculations, hydrogen bonding of HOAcF to a superoxo O-atom in 2 is established. Results from NMR spectroscopy of 2 at −120 °C in 2-methyltetrahydrofuran are also consistent with 1/HOAcF = 1:1 formulation of 2 and with this complex possessing a triplet (S = 1) ground state electronic configuration, as previously determined for 1. The pre-equilibrium acid association to 1 is followed by outer-sphere electron-transfer reduction of 2 by decamethylferrocene (Me10Fc) or octamethylferrocene (Me8Fc), leading to the products H2O2, the corresponding ferrocenium salt, and [LCu(II)(OAcF)](+). Second-order rate constants for electron transfer (ket) were determined to be 1365 M(–1) s(–1) (Me10Fc) and 225 M(–1) s(–1) (Me8Fc) at −80 °C. The (bio)chemical relevance of the proton-triggered reduction of the metal-bound dioxygen-derived fragment is discussed.
The protonation–reduction of a dioxygen adduct with n class="Chemical">[LCu(I)][B(C6F5)4], cupric superoxo complex [LCu(II)(O2(•–))]+ (1) (L = TMG3tren (1,1,1-tris[2-[N(2)-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylguanidino)]ethyl]amine)) has been investigated. Trifluoroacetic acid (HOAcF) reversibly associates with the superoxo ligand in ([LCu(II)(O2(•–))]+) in a 1:1 adduct [LCu(II)(O2(•–))(HOAcF)](+) (2), as characterized by UV–visible, resonance Raman (rR), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and X-ray absorption (XAS) spectroscopies, along with density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Chemical studies reveal that for the binding of HOAcF with 1 to give 2, Keq = 1.2 × 10(5) M(–1) (−130 °C) and ΔH° = −6.9(7) kcal/mol, ΔS° = −26(4) cal mol(–1) K(–1)). Vibrational (rR) data reveal a significant increase (29 cm(–1)) in vO–O (= 1149 cm(–1)) compared to that known for [LCu(II)(O2(•–))](+) (1). Along with results obtained from XAS and DFT calculations, hydrogen bonding of HOAcF to a superoxo O-atom in 2 is established. Results from NMR spectroscopy of 2 at −120 °C in 2-methyltetrahydrofuran are also consistent with 1/HOAcF = 1:1 formulation of 2 and with this complex possessing a triplet (S = 1) ground state electronic configuration, as previously determined for 1. The pre-equilibrium acid association to 1 is followed by outer-sphere electron-transfer reduction of 2 by decamethylferrocene (Me10Fc) or octamethylferrocene (Me8Fc), leading to the products H2O2, the corresponding ferrocenium salt, and [LCu(II)(OAcF)](+). Second-order rate constants for electron transfer (ket) were determined to be 1365 M(–1) s(–1) (Me10Fc) and 225 M(–1) s(–1) (Me8Fc) at −80 °C. The (bio)chemical relevance of the proton-triggered reduction of the metal-bound dioxygen-derived fragment is discussed.
Authors: Nermeen W Aboelella; Sergey V Kryatov; Benjamin F Gherman; William W Brennessel; Victor G Young; Ritimukta Sarangi; Elena V Rybak-Akimova; Keith O Hodgson; Britt Hedman; Edward I Solomon; Christopher J Cramer; William B Tolman Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2004-12-29 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Debabrata Maiti; H Christopher Fry; Julia S Woertink; Michael A Vance; Edward I Solomon; Kenneth D Karlin Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2007-01-17 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Mayukh Bhadra; Jung Yoon C Lee; Ryan E Cowley; Sunghee Kim; Maxime A Siegler; Edward I Solomon; Kenneth D Karlin Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2018-07-13 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: David A Quist; Melanie A Ehudin; Andrew W Schaefer; Gregory L Schneider; Edward I Solomon; Kenneth D Karlin Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Rui Cao; Claudio Saracini; Jake W Ginsbach; Matthew T Kieber-Emmons; Maxime A Siegler; Edward I Solomon; Shunichi Fukuzumi; Kenneth D Karlin Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2016-05-26 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Courtney E Elwell; Nicole L Gagnon; Benjamin D Neisen; Debanjan Dhar; Andrew D Spaeth; Gereon M Yee; William B Tolman Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2017-01-19 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Hyun Kim; Patrick J Rogler; Savita K Sharma; Andrew W Schaefer; Edward I Solomon; Kenneth D Karlin Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2020-01-28 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Sunghee Kim; Jake W Ginsbach; Jung Yoon Lee; Ryan L Peterson; Jeffrey J Liu; Maxime A Siegler; Amy A Sarjeant; Edward I Solomon; Kenneth D Karlin Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2015-02-23 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Benjamin D Neisen; Nicole L Gagnon; Debanjan Dhar; Andrew D Spaeth; William B Tolman Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Ryan E Cowley; Jordi Cirera; Munzarin F Qayyum; Dalia Rokhsana; Britt Hedman; Keith O Hodgson; David M Dooley; Edward I Solomon Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 15.419