Literature DB >> 24164461

A novel assay for detecting fusion pore formation: implications for the fusion mechanism.

Hirak Chakraborty1, Pradip K Tarafdar, Barry R Lentz.   

Abstract

Membrane fusion is broadly envisioned as a two- or three-step process proceeding from contacting bilayers through one or two semistable, nonlamellar lipidic intermediate structures to a fusion pore. A true fusion event requires mixing of contents between compartments and is monitored by the movement of soluble molecules between trapped compartments. We have used poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) to rapidly generate an ensemble aggregated state A that proceeds sequentially through intermediates (I₁ and/or I₂) to a final fusion pore state (FP) with rate constants k₁, k₂, and k₃. Movement of moderately sized solutes (e.g., Tb³⁺/dipicolinic acid) has been used to detect pores assigned to intermediate states as well as to the final state (FP). Analysis of ensemble kinetic data has required that mixing of contents occurs with defined probabilities (αi) in each ensemble state, although it is unclear whether pores that form in different states are different. We introduce here a simple new assay that employs fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between a 6-carboxyfluorescein (donor) and tetramethylrhodamine (acceptor), which are covalently attached to complementary sequences of 10 bp oligonucleotides. Complementary sequences of fluorophore-labeled oligonucleotides were incorporated in vesicles separately, and the level of FRET increased in a simple exponential fashion during PEG-mediated fusion. The resulting rate constant corresponded closely to the slow rate constant of FP formation (k₃) derived from small molecule assays. Additionally, the total extent of oligonucleotide mixing corresponded to the fraction of content mixing that occurred in state FP in the small molecule assay. The results show that both large "final pores" and small (presumably transient) pores can form between vesicles throughout the fusion process. The implications of this result for the mechanism of membrane fusion are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24164461      PMCID: PMC3881274          DOI: 10.1021/bi401369j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  35 in total

1.  A new mechanism of model membrane fusion determined from Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  M Müller; K Katsov; M Schick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Molecular beacons: probes that fluoresce upon hybridization.

Authors:  S Tyagi; F R Kramer
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  The modified stalk mechanism of lamellar/inverted phase transitions and its implications for membrane fusion.

Authors:  D P Siegel
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Dynamic Ca2+-dependent stimulation of vesicle fusion by membrane-anchored synaptotagmin 1.

Authors:  Han-Ki Lee; Yoosoo Yang; Zengliu Su; Changbong Hyeon; Tae-Sun Lee; Hong-Won Lee; Dae-Hyuk Kweon; Yeon-Kyun Shin; Tae-Young Yoon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The transmembrane domain peptide of vesicular stomatitis virus promotes both intermediate and pore formation during PEG-mediated vesicle fusion.

Authors:  Tanusree Sengupta; Hirak Chakraborty; Barry R Lentz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Influence of lipid composition on physical properties and peg-mediated fusion of curved and uncurved model membrane vesicles: "nature's own" fusogenic lipid bilayer.

Authors:  M E Haque; T J McIntosh; B R Lentz
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2001-04-10       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Energetics of vesicle fusion intermediates: comparison of calculations with observed effects of osmotic and curvature stresses.

Authors:  Vladimir S Malinin; Barry R Lentz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Spontaneous fusion of phosphatidylcholine small unilamellar vesicles in the fluid phase.

Authors:  B R Lentz; T J Carpenter; D R Alford
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1987-08-25       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Analysis of membrane fusion as a two-state sequential process: evaluation of the stalk model.

Authors:  Gabriel Weinreb; Barry R Lentz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Phosphatidylserine inhibits and calcium promotes model membrane fusion.

Authors:  Pradip K Tarafdar; Hirak Chakraborty; S Moses Dennison; Barry R Lentz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.