Literature DB >> 15111411

Energetics of vesicle fusion intermediates: comparison of calculations with observed effects of osmotic and curvature stresses.

Vladimir S Malinin1, Barry R Lentz.   

Abstract

We reported previously the effects of both osmotic and curvature stress on fusion between poly(ethylene glycol)-aggregated vesicles. In this article, we analyze the energetics of fusion of vesicles of different curvature, paying particular attention to the effects of osmotic stress on small, highly curved vesicles of 26 nm diameter, composed of lipids with negative intrinsic curvature. Our calculations show that high positive curvature of the outer monolayer "charges" these vesicles with excess bending energy, which then releases during stalk expansion (increase of the stalk radius, r(s)) and thus "drives" fusion. Calculations based on the known mechanical properties of lipid assemblies suggest that the free energy of "void" formation as well as membrane-bending free energy dominate the evolution of a stalk to an extended transmembrane contact. The free-energy profile of stalk expansion (free energy versus r(s)) clearly shows the presence of two metastable intermediates (intermediate 1 at r(s) approximately 0 - 1.0 nm and intermediate 2 at r(s) approximately 2.5 - 3.0 nm). Applying osmotic gradients of +/-5 atm, when assuming a fixed trans-bilayer lipid mass distribution, did not significantly change the free-energy profile. However, inclusion in the model of an additional degree of freedom, the ability of lipids to move into and out of the "void", made the free-energy profile strongly dependent on the osmotic gradient. Vesicle expansion increased the energy barrier between intermediates by approximately 4 kT and the absolute value of the barrier by approximately 7 kT, whereas compression decreased it by nearly the same extent. Since these calculations, which are based on the stalk hypothesis, correctly predict the effects of both membrane curvature and osmotic stress, they support the stalk hypothesis for the mechanism of membrane fusion and suggest that both forms of stress alter the final stages, rather than the initial step, of the fusion process, as previously suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15111411      PMCID: PMC1304163          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74346-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  48 in total

1.  Membrane fusion mediated by coiled coils: a hypothesis.

Authors:  J Bentz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Membrane fusion: overcoming of the hydration barrier and local restructuring.

Authors:  S L Leikin; M M Kozlov; L V Chernomordik; V S Markin; Y A Chizmadzhev
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1987-12-21       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Elastic deformation and failure of lipid bilayer membranes containing cholesterol.

Authors:  D Needham; R S Nunn
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Exclusion of poly(ethylene glycol) from liposome surfaces.

Authors:  K Arnold; O Zschoernig; D Barthel; W Herold
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1990-03

Review 5.  Poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-mediated fusion between pure lipid bilayers: a mechanism in common with viral fusion and secretory vesicle release?

Authors:  B R Lentz; J K Lee
Journal:  Mol Membr Biol       Date:  1999 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.857

6.  Energetics of intermediates in membrane fusion: comparison of stalk and inverted micellar intermediate mechanisms.

Authors:  D P Siegel
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Bilayer curvature and certain amphipaths promote poly(ethylene glycol)-induced fusion of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine unilamellar vesicles.

Authors:  B R Lentz; G F McIntyre; D J Parks; J C Yates; D Massenburg
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1992-03-17       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Diacylglycerol and hexadecane increase divalent cation-induced lipid mixing rates between phosphatidylserine large unilamellar vesicles.

Authors:  A Walter; P L Yeagle; D P Siegel
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  X-ray diffraction reconstruction of the inverted hexagonal (HII) phase in lipid-water systems.

Authors:  D C Turner; S M Gruner
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1992-02-11       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Variation in hydration forces between neutral phospholipid bilayers: evidence for hydration attraction.

Authors:  R P Rand; N Fuller; V A Parsegian; D C Rau
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1988-10-04       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  38 in total

1.  On the analysis of elastic deformations in hexagonal phases.

Authors:  Vladimir S Malinin; Barry R Lentz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Stalk phase formation: effects of dehydration and saddle splay modulus.

Authors:  Yonathan Kozlovsky; Avishay Efrat; David P Siegel; David A Siegel; Michael M Kozlov
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Activation thermodynamics of poly(ethylene glycol)-mediated model membrane fusion support mechanistic models of stalk and pore formation.

Authors:  Hirak Chakraborty; Pradip K Tarafdar; Michael J Bruno; Tanusree Sengupta; Barry R Lentz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Conical electron tomography of a chemical synapse: vesicles docked to the active zone are hemi-fused.

Authors:  G A Zampighi; L M Zampighi; N Fain; S Lanzavecchia; S A Simon; E M Wright
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Seeing is believing: the stalk intermediate.

Authors:  Barry R Lentz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Field theoretic study of bilayer membrane fusion III: membranes with leaves of different composition.

Authors:  J Y Lee; M Schick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Calculation of free energy barriers to the fusion of small vesicles.

Authors:  J Y Lee; M Schick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Docking and fast fusion of synaptobrevin vesicles depends on the lipid compositions of the vesicle and the acceptor SNARE complex-containing target membrane.

Authors:  Marta K Domanska; Volker Kiessling; Lukas K Tamm
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Hemagglutinin fusion peptide mutants in model membranes: structural properties, membrane physical properties, and PEG-mediated fusion.

Authors:  Md Emdadul Haque; Hirak Chakraborty; Tilen Koklic; Hiroaki Komatsu; Paul H Axelsen; Barry R Lentz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Productive hemifusion intermediates in fast vesicle fusion driven by neuronal SNAREs.

Authors:  Tingting Liu; Tingting Wang; Edwin R Chapman; James C Weisshaar
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.