Literature DB >> 2416441

Tumor markers: value and limitations in the management of cancer patients.

S E Bates, D L Longo.   

Abstract

Sixteen tumor markers are reviewed, and measured to the ideal: produced by the tumor cell alone absent in health and in benign disease present in all patients with a given malignancy level in the blood representative of tumor mass detectable in occult disease. The only marker that approaches the ideal is human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) in gestational trophoblastic tumors. In this malignancy, the HCG level suggests the diagnosis and stage, confirms response to therapy, and predicts relapse. The three most widely used and intensely studied tumor markers are carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), alphafetoprotein (AFP), and HCG. CEA cannot be used in screening for cancer, but in carcinoma of the colon its elevation preoperatively increases the likelihood of advanced disease and postoperative recurrence. Postoperatively, elevated titers are often but not invariably associated with recurrent disease. AFP and HCG are useful in the management of nonseminomatous germ cell testicular tumors. Like CEA, they cannot be used for screening. They are more likely to be increased with advancing stage, and after therapy rising levels almost always mean recurrent disease. Some markers are valuable in specific circumstances, such as calcitonin in screening for familial medullary carcinoma of the thyroid. In multiple myeloma, immunoglobulins are useful in determining the tumor mass and response to therapy. In neuroblastoma, catecholamine metabolites are useful primarily in making the diagnosis. In some malignancies, the absence of effective therapy lowers the value of the marker, as for AFP in hepatoma. The remaining markers are too unreliable or too little studied to be useful in the management of an individual patient with cancer. The purpose of this paper is to provide the clinician with an understanding of the limitations of the present tumor markers that will lead to wiser use of the tests, and to provide standards to which future tumor markers should be measured.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2416441     DOI: 10.1016/0305-7372(85)90037-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev        ISSN: 0305-7372            Impact factor:   12.111


  16 in total

1.  Levels of enzymes in leukaemic mice treated withAeromonas L-asparaginase.

Authors:  P J Benny; G Muraleedhara Kurup; K Sreejith
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  1999-07

2.  Annual periodic increases in serum carcinoembryonic antigen concurrent with ground-glass opacity in the lung: report of a case.

Authors:  Tsutomu Sakuma; Yumiko Iwata; Yoshimichi Ueda; Xiu Gu; Makoto Sugita; Motoyasu Sagawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Monitor tumor burden with circulating tumor DNA.

Authors:  William D Figg; Jim Reid
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 4.742

4.  The value of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in asymptomatic examinees with unexplained elevated blood carcinoembryonic antigen levels.

Authors:  Wenfeng Li; Weiwei Yin; Rongying Ou; Ting Chen; Lingling Xiong; Dezhi Cheng; Deyao Xie; Xiangwu Zheng; Yunsheng Xu; Liang Zhao
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Increased serum concentrations of cholesterol and triglycerides in the progression of breast cancer.

Authors:  C C Zielinski; I Stuller; P Rausch; C Müller
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Placental isoferritin (PLF) in comparison with MCA and CEA in advanced breast cancer--first data from a pilot study.

Authors:  M Stierer; H R Rosen; E Forster; C Moroz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 7.  Carcinoembryonic antigen: function in metastasis by human colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  J M Jessup; P Thomas
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 9.264

8.  Fine-scale quantification of HCG beta gene transcription in human trophoblastic and non-malignant non-trophoblastic tissues.

Authors:  K Rull; P Hallast; L Uusküla; J Jackson; M Punab; A Salumets; R K Campbell; M Laan
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 4.025

9.  Mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) site-mapping of N-glycosylated membrane proteins for breast cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Stephen A Whelan; Ming Lu; Jianbo He; Weihong Yan; Romaine E Saxton; Kym F Faull; Julian P Whitelegge; Helena R Chang
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  Tissue polypeptide antigen in tumor cytosol: a new prognostic indicator in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  M Gion; R Mione; C Gatti; R Dittadi; A Leon; C Castiglioni; O Nascimben; G Bruscagnin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.