Literature DB >> 19522481

Mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) site-mapping of N-glycosylated membrane proteins for breast cancer biomarkers.

Stephen A Whelan1, Ming Lu, Jianbo He, Weihong Yan, Romaine E Saxton, Kym F Faull, Julian P Whitelegge, Helena R Chang.   

Abstract

Cancer cell membrane proteins are released into the plasma/serum by exterior protein cleavage, membrane sloughing, cellular secretion or cell lysis, and represent promising candidates for interrogation. Because many known disease biomarkers are both glycoproteins and membrane bound, we chose the hydrazide method to specifically target, enrich, and identify glycosylated proteins from breast cancer cell membrane fractions using the LTQ Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Our initial goal was to select membrane proteins from breast cancer cell lines and then to use the hydrazide method to identify the N-linked proteome as a prelude to evaluation of plasma/serum proteins from cancer patients. A combination of steps facilitated identification of the glycopeptides and also defined the glycosylation sites. In MCF-7, MDA-MB-453 and MDA-MB-468 cell membrane fractions, use of the hydrazide method facilitated an initial enrichment and site mapping of 27 N-linked glycosylation sites in 25 different proteins. However, only three N-linked glycosylated proteins, galectin-3 binding protein, lysosome associated membrane glycoprotein 1, and oxygen regulated protein, were identified in all three breast cancer cell lines. In addition, MCF-7 cells shared an additional 3 proteins with MDA-MB-453. Interestingly, the hydrazide method isolated a number of other N-linked glycoproteins also known to be involved in breast cancer, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), CD44, and the breast cancer 1, and early onset isoform 1 (BRCA1) biomarker. Analyzing the N-glycoproteins from membranes of breast cancer cell lines highlights the usefulness of the procedure for generating a practical set of potential biomarkers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19522481      PMCID: PMC2761014          DOI: 10.1021/pr900322g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  61 in total

Review 1.  The case for early detection.

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni; Nicole Urban; Scott Ramsey; Martin McIntosh; Stephen Schwartz; Brian Reid; Jerald Radich; Garnet Anderson; Leland Hartwell
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search.

Authors:  Andrew Keller; Alexey I Nesvizhskii; Eugene Kolker; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  p15(PAF), a novel PCNA associated factor with increased expression in tumor tissues.

Authors:  P Yu; B Huang; M Shen; C Lau; E Chan; J Michel; Y Xiong; D G Payan; Y Luo
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2001-01-25       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology.

Authors:  M P Washburn; D Wolters; J R Yates
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Extended Range Proteomic Analysis (ERPA): a new and sensitive LC-MS platform for high sequence coverage of complex proteins with extensive post-translational modifications-comprehensive analysis of beta-casein and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR).

Authors:  Shiaw-Lin Wu; Jeongkwon Kim; William S Hancock; Barry Karger
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.466

6.  Breast tumor characteristics as predictors of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers.

Authors:  P L Porter; A Y El-Bastawissi; M T Mandelson; M G Lin; N Khalid; E A Watney; L Cousens; D White; S Taplin; E White
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  2000 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer: clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors:  R C Bast; P Ravdin; D F Hayes; S Bates; H Fritsche; J M Jessup; N Kemeny; G Y Locker; R G Mennel; M R Somerfield
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Characterization of the carbohydrate chains of the secreted form of the human epidermal growth factor receptor.

Authors:  C J Stroop; W Weber; G J Gerwig; M Nimtz; J P Kamerling; J F Vliegenthart
Journal:  Glycobiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.313

9.  Delineation of prognostic biomarkers in prostate cancer.

Authors:  S M Dhanasekaran; T R Barrette; D Ghosh; R Shah; S Varambally; K Kurachi; K J Pienta; M A Rubin; A M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Glycosylation-induced conformational modification positively regulates receptor-receptor association: a study with an aberrant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFRvIII/DeltaEGFR) expressed in cancer cells.

Authors:  H Fernandes; S Cohen; S Bishayee
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-11-21       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  33 in total

Review 1.  Mass spectrometry based glycoproteomics--from a proteomics perspective.

Authors:  Sheng Pan; Ru Chen; Ruedi Aebersold; Teresa A Brentnall
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  N-linked glycosylation enrichment for in-depth cell surface proteomics of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma subtypes.

Authors:  Sally J Deeb; Juergen Cox; Marc Schmidt-Supprian; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Proteome bioprofiles distinguish between M1 priming and activation states in human macrophages.

Authors:  Joseph Brown; Mark A Wallet; Bryan Krastins; David Sarracino; Maureen M Goodenow
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.962

Review 4.  Innovative proteomics for the discovery of systemically accessible cancer biomarkers suitable for imaging and targeted therapies.

Authors:  Andrei Turtoi; Edwin De Pauw; Vincent Castronovo
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Glycoprotein Enrichment Analytical Techniques: Advantages and Disadvantages.

Authors:  R Zhu; L Zacharias; K M Wooding; W Peng; Y Mechref
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 1.600

6.  Mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) identified proteomic biosignatures of breast cancer in proximal fluid.

Authors:  Stephen A Whelan; Jianbo He; Ming Lu; Puneet Souda; Romaine E Saxton; Kym F Faull; Julian P Whitelegge; Helena R Chang
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 7.  Global and site-specific analysis of protein glycosylation in complex biological systems with Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Haopeng Xiao; Fangxu Sun; Suttipong Suttapitugsakul; Ronghu Wu
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 10.946

8.  Dynamic Changes in Equatorial Segment Protein 1 (SPESP1) Glycosylation During Mouse Spermiogenesis.

Authors:  Viswanadhapalli Suryavathi; Subbarayalu Panneerdoss; Michael J Wolkowicz; Jagathpala Shetty; Nicholas E Sherman; Charles J Flickinger; John C Herr
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.285

9.  Quantification of glycopeptides by multiple reaction monitoring liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Ehwang Song; Swetha Pyreddy; Yehia Mechref
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Hydrophobic Proteome Analysis of Triple Negative and Hormone-Receptor-Positive-Her2-Negative Breast Cancer by Mass Spectrometer.

Authors:  Ming Lu; Stephen A Whelan; Jianbo He; Romaine E Saxton; Kym F Faull; Julian P Whitelegge; Helena R Chang
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 3.988

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.