Literature DB >> 24164389

Phenotypic and genotypic convergences are influenced by historical contingency and environment in yeast.

Aymé Spor1, Daniel J Kvitek2, Thibault Nidelet3, Juliette Martin4, Judith Legrand1, Christine Dillmann1, Aurélie Bourgais5, Dominique de Vienne1, Gavin Sherlock2, Delphine Sicard1.   

Abstract

Different organisms have independently and recurrently evolved similar phenotypic traits at different points throughout history. This phenotypic convergence may be caused by genotypic convergence and in addition, constrained by historical contingency. To investigate how convergence may be driven by selection in a particular environment and constrained by history, we analyzed nine life-history traits and four metabolic traits during an experimental evolution of six yeast strains in four different environments. In each of the environments, the population converged toward a different multivariate phenotype. However, the evolution of most traits, including fitness components, was constrained by history. Phenotypic convergence was partly associated with the selection of mutations in genes involved in the same pathway. By further investigating the convergence in one gene, BMH1, mutated in 20% of the evolved populations, we show that both the history and the environment influenced the types of mutations (missense/nonsense), their location within the gene itself, as well as their effects on multiple traits. However, these effects could not be easily predicted from ancestors' phylogeny or past selection. Combined, our data highlight the role of pleiotropy and epistasis in shaping a rugged fitness landscape.
© 2013 The Author(s). Evolution © 2013 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  14-3-3 protein; Adaptive landscape; experimental evolution; life-history evolution; pleiotropy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24164389      PMCID: PMC4439200          DOI: 10.1111/evo.12302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  67 in total

Review 1.  The adaptive landscape as a conceptual bridge between micro- and macroevolution.

Authors:  S J Arnold; M E Pfrender; A G Jones
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Constraint shapes convergence in tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channels of snakes.

Authors:  Chris R Feldman; Edmund D Brodie; Edmund D Brodie; Michael E Pfrender
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The contribution of ancestry, chance, and past and ongoing selection to adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Amitabh Joshi; Robinson B Castillo; Laurence D Mueller
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  The S. cerevisiae CDC25 gene product regulates the RAS/adenylate cyclase pathway.

Authors:  D Broek; T Toda; T Michaeli; L Levin; C Birchmeier; M Zoller; S Powers; M Wigler
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1987-03-13       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Inactivation of the protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunit A results in morphological and transcriptional defects in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  W van Zyl; W Huang; A A Sneddon; M Stark; S Camier; M Werner; C Marck; A Sentenac; J R Broach
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Optimization of gene expression through divergent mutational paths.

Authors:  Hsin-Hung Chou; Christopher J Marx
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 9.423

7.  Systematic identification of pathways that couple cell growth and division in yeast.

Authors:  Paul Jorgensen; Joy L Nishikawa; Bobby-Joe Breitkreutz; Mike Tyers
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-06-27       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  14-3-3 protects against stress-induced apoptosis.

Authors:  C Clapp; L Portt; C Khoury; S Sheibani; G Norman; P Ebner; R Eid; H Vali; C A Mandato; F Madeo; M T Greenwood
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 8.469

9.  Analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae pan-genome reveals a pool of copy number variants distributed in diverse yeast strains from differing industrial environments.

Authors:  Barbara Dunn; Chandra Richter; Daniel J Kvitek; Tom Pugh; Gavin Sherlock
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Genotypic but not phenotypic historical contingency revealed by viral experimental evolution.

Authors:  Stéphanie Bedhomme; Guillaume Lafforgue; Santiago F Elena
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  19 in total

1.  Repeatability of adaptation in experimental populations of different sizes.

Authors:  Josianne Lachapelle; Joshua Reid; Nick Colegrave
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The evolution of bacterial cell size: the internal diffusion-constraint hypothesis.

Authors:  Romain Gallet; Cyrille Violle; Nathalie Fromin; Roula Jabbour-Zahab; Brian J Enquist; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Hundreds of Genes Experienced Convergent Shifts in Selective Pressure in Marine Mammals.

Authors:  Maria Chikina; Joseph D Robinson; Nathan L Clark
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Interplay between extreme drift and selection intensities favors the fixation of beneficial mutations in selfing maize populations.

Authors:  Arnaud Desbiez-Piat; Arnaud Le Rouzic; Maud I Tenaillon; Christine Dillmann
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-10-02       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Accelerating Mutational Load Is Not Due to Synergistic Epistasis or Mutator Alleles in Mutation Accumulation Lines of Yeast.

Authors:  Jean-Nicolas Jasmin; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Feedback between environment and traits under selection in a seasonal environment: consequences for experimental evolution.

Authors:  Dorian Collot; Thibault Nidelet; Johan Ramsayer; Olivier C Martin; Sylvie Méléard; Christine Dillmann; Delphine Sicard; Judith Legrand
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Genomic basis of parallel adaptation varies with divergence in Arabidopsis and its relatives.

Authors:  Magdalena Bohutínská; Jakub Vlček; Sivan Yair; Benjamin Laenen; Veronika Konečná; Marco Fracassetti; Tanja Slotte; Filip Kolář
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Historical Contingency Causes Divergence in Adaptive Expression of the lac Operon.

Authors:  Kedar Karkare; Huei-Yi Lai; Ricardo B R Azevedo; Tim F Cooper
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Repeated evolution and the impact of evolutionary history on adaptation.

Authors:  Terry J Ord; Thomas C Summers
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Laboratory selection quickly erases historical differentiation.

Authors:  Inês Fragata; Pedro Simões; Miguel Lopes-Cunha; Margarida Lima; Bárbara Kellen; Margarida Bárbaro; Josiane Santos; Michael R Rose; Mauro Santos; Margarida Matos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.