Literature DB >> 2416425

DNA methylation and cancer.

P A Jones.   

Abstract

The main thrusts of the arguments that aberrant DNA methylation is involved in the generation of tumor heterogeneity and progression can be summarized as follows. The methylation of specific cytosine residues in DNA is certainly an important component in multilevel gene control in eukaryotes. The discovery of CpG clusters in the flanking regions of genes and their under-methylation on housekeeping genes, except those located on inactive X-chromosomes, strongly suggests a controlling function for modification in these regions. Since methylation plays an important role in controlling normal cellular development, it follows that aberrations within this mechanism may be implicated in the abnormal gene control which characterizes cancer. Methylation patterns are not copied rigorously in rapidly dividing cells. This may be because there is normally a close coordination between DNA synthesis, DNA methylation, and DNA packaging, and changes in the timing of these processes could conceivably result in hypomethylation at some sites and de novo methylation at others. Since the greatest variability of methylation patterns is seen in nonexpressed genes, it is possible that there is a tendency for cells to activate genes when dividing in an inappropriate growth environment. The constant evolution and shuffling of methylation patterns which occur during division might play a role in the development of new phenotypes within cell populations. One might predict that selective pressures within the host would select for those cells with specific new methylation patterns allowing for the expression of genes necessary for survival in a particular environment. Many experiments have in fact shown that methylation levels and patterns and indeed methyltransferase levels (57) are altered in cancer cells. Thus, there is considerable heterogeneity within tumor populations with regard to this fundamental biological control mechanism. The fact that direct intervention by the use of 5-aza-Cyd can result in dramatic alterations in malignant potential allows this hypothesis to be tested more critically. Hopefully, the use of 5-aza-Cyd in defined systems will allow us to isolate genes which might become activated by drug treatment and which might contribute to metastatic potential. An understanding of the fundamental aspects of the enzymology and control of DNA methylation might therefore allow us to make significant inroads into understanding how heterogeneity is generated and what we might do about it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2416425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  60 in total

1.  Influence of in vitro manipulation on the stability of methylation patterns in the Snurf/Snrpn-imprinting region in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Axel Schumacher; Walter Doerfler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-03-05       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Insights into Impact of DNA Copy Number Alteration and Methylation on the Proteogenomic Landscape of Human Ovarian Cancer via a Multi-omics Integrative Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Song; Jiayi Ji; Kevin J Gleason; Fan Yang; John A Martignetti; Lin S Chen; Pei Wang
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Influence of diet on breast cancer size and morphology in rats treated with DMBA.

Authors:  U Torsten; D Senger; H K Weitzel
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Dynamic heterogeneity: metastatic variants to liver are generated spontaneously in mouse embryonal carcinoma cells.

Authors:  J F Harris; M W Best
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1988 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.150

5.  Effect of 5-azacytidine on gene expression in marrow stromal cells.

Authors:  D F Andrews; J Nemunaitis; C Tompkins; J W Singer
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Differential nuclear protein binding to 5-azacytosine-containing DNA as a potential mechanism for 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine resistance.

Authors:  L A Michalowsky; P A Jones
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Effect of prolactin on DNA methylation in the liver and kidney of rat.

Authors:  P M Reddy; P R Reddy
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  1990-06-01       Impact factor: 3.396

8.  Conversion of premalignant human cells to tumorigenic cells by methylmethane sulfonate and methylnitronitrosoguanidine.

Authors:  G E Milo; C F Shuler; G Stoner; J C Chen
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  1992 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 6.691

9.  Chemical carcinogen-induced decreases in genomic 5-methyldeoxycytidine content of normal human bronchial epithelial cells.

Authors:  V L Wilson; R A Smith; J Longoria; M A Liotta; C M Harper; C C Harris
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Tackling the methylome: recent methodological advances in genome-wide methylation profiling.

Authors:  Marcos Rh Estécio; Jean-Pierre J Issa
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 11.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.