Literature DB >> 24164104

Dosimetric inter-institutional comparison in European radiotherapy centres: Results of IAEA supported treatment planning system audit.

Eduard Gershkevitsh1, Csilla Pesznyak, Borislava Petrovic, Joseph Grezdo, Krzysztof Chelminski, Maria do Carmo Lopes, Joanna Izewska, Jacob Van Dyk.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: One of the newer audit modalities operated by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) involves audits of treatment planning systems (TPS) in radiotherapy. The main focus of the audit is the dosimetry verification of the delivery of a radiation treatment plan for three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy using high energy photon beams. The audit has been carried out in eight European countries - Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Serbia, Slovakia, Poland and Portugal. The corresponding results are presented.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The TPS audit reviews the dosimetry, treatment planning and radiotherapy delivery processes using the 'end-to-end' approach, i.e. following the pathway similar to that of the patient, through imaging, treatment planning and dose delivery. The audit is implemented at the national level with IAEA assistance. The national counterparts conduct the TPS audit at local radiotherapy centres through on-site visits. TPS calculated doses are compared with ion chamber measurements performed in an anthropomorphic phantom for eight test cases per algorithm/beam. A set of pre-defined agreement criteria is used to analyse the performance of TPSs.
RESULTS: TPS audit was carried out in 60 radiotherapy centres. In total, 190 data sets (combination of algorithm and beam quality) have been collected and reviewed. Dosimetry problems requiring interventions were discovered in about 10% of datasets. In addition, suboptimal beam modelling in TPSs was discovered in a number of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: The TPS audit project using the IAEA methodology has verified the treatment planning system calculations for 3D conformal radiotherapy in a group of radiotherapy centres in Europe. It contributed to achieving better understanding of the performance of TPSs and helped to resolve issues related to imaging, dosimetry and treatment planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24164104     DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.840742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  8 in total

1.  Determination of boundaries between ranges of high and low gradient of beam profile.

Authors:  Jacek Wendykier; Marcin Bieniasiewicz; Aleksandra Grządziel; Tadeusz Jedynak; Wiktor Kośniewski; Marta Reudelsdorf; Piotr Wendykier
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-02-13

Review 2.  The role of SSDL in quality assurance in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Wojciech Bulski; Krzysztof Chełmiński; Piotr Ulkowski; Wioletta Ślusarczyk-Kacprzyk; Iwona Grabska; Paweł Kukołowicz
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2020-08-16

3.  Using beam profile inflection point in process of treatment planning system verification.

Authors:  Jacek Wendykier; Aleksandra Grządziel; Barbara Bekman; Marcin Bieniasiewicz; Adam Bekman; Piotr Wendykier; Bożena Woźniak; Marta Reudelsdorf; Krzysztof Ślosarek
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2021-08-12

4.  Optimization of the dosimetric leaf gap for use in planning VMAT treatments of spine SABR cases.

Authors:  Nigel D Middlebrook; Bess Sutherland; Tanya Kairn
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Evaluation of two-dimensional dose distributions for pre-treatment patient-specific IMRT dosimetry.

Authors:  Đeni Smilovic Radojcic; David Rajlic; Bozidar Casar; Manda Svabic Kolacio; Nevena Obajdin; Dario Faj; Slaven Jurkovic
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 6.  Novel methodologies for dosimetry audits: Adapting to advanced radiotherapy techniques.

Authors:  Marlies Pasler; Victor Hernandez; Núria Jornet; Catharine H Clark
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-03-19

7.  Testing the methodology for dosimetry audit of heterogeneity corrections and small MLC-shaped fields: Results of IAEA multi-center studies.

Authors:  Joanna Izewska; Paulina Wesolowska; Godfrey Azangwe; David S Followill; David I Thwaites; Mehenna Arib; Amalia Stefanic; Claudio Viegas; Luo Suming; Daniela Ekendahl; Wojciech Bulski; Dietmar Georg
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 4.089

8.  A Practical Method to Optimize Quality Assurance Results of Arc Therapy Plans in Beam Modeling.

Authors:  Jinyu Xue; Hesheng Wang; David Barbee; Matthew Schmidt; Indra J Das
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.