Literature DB >> 24163333

Hierarchical encoding makes individuals in a group seem more attractive.

Drew Walker1, Edward Vul.   

Abstract

In the research reported here, we found evidence of the cheerleader effect-people seem more attractive in a group than in isolation. We propose that this effect arises via an interplay of three cognitive phenomena: (a) The visual system automatically computes ensemble representations of faces presented in a group, (b) individual members of the group are biased toward this ensemble average, and (c) average faces are attractive. Taken together, these phenomena suggest that individual faces will seem more attractive when presented in a group because they will appear more similar to the average group face, which is more attractive than group members' individual faces. We tested this hypothesis in five experiments in which subjects rated the attractiveness of faces presented either alone or in a group with the same gender. Our results were consistent with the cheerleader effect.

Entities:  

Keywords:  face perception; visual perception

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24163333     DOI: 10.1177/0956797613497969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  16 in total

1.  The capacity limitations of orientation summary statistics.

Authors:  Mouna Attarha; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Emotional cues and social anxiety resolve ambiguous perception of biological motion.

Authors:  Hörmet Yiltiz; Lihan Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Simultaneous perceptual and response biases on sequential face attractiveness judgments.

Authors:  Teresa K Pegors; Marcelo G Mattar; Peter B Bryan; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2015-04-13

4.  Comparisons make faces more attractive: An ERP study.

Authors:  Shangfeng Han; Jie Hu; Jie Gao; Jiayu Fan; Xinyun Xu; Pengfei Xu; Yuejia Luo
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Statistical Properties Demand as Much Attention as Object Features.

Authors:  Liqiang Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Combined Effects of Gaze and Orientation of Faces on Person Judgments in Social Situations.

Authors:  Raphaela E Kaisler; Helmut Leder
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-22

7.  Beware of Selfies: The Impact of Photo Type on Impression Formation Based on Social Networking Profiles.

Authors:  Nicole C Krämer; Markus Feurstein; Jan P Kluck; Yannic Meier; Marius Rother; Stephan Winter
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-16

8.  Exaggerated groups: amplification in ensemble coding of temporal and spatial features.

Authors:  Shoko Kanaya; Masamichi J Hayashi; David Whitney
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Reflective and Non-conscious Responses to Exercise Images.

Authors:  Kathryn Cope; Corneel Vandelanotte; Camille E Short; David E Conroy; Ryan E Rhodes; Ben Jackson; James A Dimmock; Amanda L Rebar
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-01-11

10.  Visuospatial asymmetries do not modulate the cheerleader effect.

Authors:  Daniel J Carragher; Blake J Lawrence; Nicole A Thomas; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.