Literature DB >> 24163208

A prospective cohort study to refine and validate the Panic Screening Score for identifying panic attacks associated with unexplained chest pain in the emergency department.

Guillaume Foldes-Busque1, Isabelle Denis, Julien Poitras, Richard P Fleet, Patrick Archambault, Clermont E Dionne.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Panic-like anxiety (panic attacks with or without panic disorder), a highly treatable condition, is the most prevalent condition associated with unexplained chest pain in the emergency department. Panic-like anxiety may be responsible for a significant portion of the negative consequences of unexplained chest pain, such as functional limitations and chronicity. However, more than 92% of panic-like anxiety cases remain undiagnosed at the time of discharge from the emergency department. The 4-item Panic Screening Score (PSS) questionnaire was derived in order to increase the identification of panic-like anxiety in emergency department patients with unexplained chest pain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The goals of this prospective cohort study were to (1) refine the PSS; (2) validate the revised version of the PSS; (3) measure the reliability of the revised version of the PSS and (4) assess the acceptability of the instrument among emergency physicians. Eligible and consenting patients will be administered the PSS in a large emergency department. Patients will be contacted by phone for administration of the criterion standard for panic attacks as well as by a standardised interview to collect information for other predictors of panic attacks. Multivariate analysis will be used to refine the PSS. The new version will be prospectively validated in an independent sample and inter-rater agreement will be assessed in 10% of cases. The screening instrument acceptability will be assessed with the Ottawa Acceptability of Decision Rules Instrument. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol has been reviewed and approved by the Alphonse-Desjardins research ethics committee. The results of the study will be presented in scientific conferences and published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. Further dissemination via workshops and a dedicated website is planned.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emergency medicine; Non-cardiac chest pain; Panic attacks; Panic disorder; Unexplained chest pain

Year:  2013        PMID: 24163208      PMCID: PMC3808760          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  85 in total

Review 1.  Methodologic standards for the development of clinical decision rules in emergency medicine.

Authors:  I G Stiell; G A Wells
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 2.  The challenge of evaluating the patient with chest pain.

Authors:  S E Kahn
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.534

3.  Panic disorder in primary care: patients' attributions of illness causes and willingness to accept psychiatric treatment.

Authors:  M R Johnson; P B Gold; L Siemion; K M Magruder; B C Frueh; A B Santos
Journal:  Int J Psychiatry Med       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.210

4.  A study of lifetime prevalence of anxiety and depressive disorders in patients presenting with chest pain to emergency medicine.

Authors:  Krishnamachari Srinivasan; Willie Joseph
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.238

5.  Modified thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) risk score to risk stratify patients in the emergency department with possible acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Zehra Jaffery; Michael P Hudson; Gordon Jacobsen; Richard Nowak; James McCord
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Panic attacks as risk markers for mental disorders*.

Authors:  Andrew J Baillie; Ronald M Rapee
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.328

7.  Prognostic implications of angiographically normal and insignificantly narrowed coronary arteries.

Authors:  M N Papanicolaou; R M Califf; M A Hlatky; R A McKinnis; F E Harrell; D B Mark; B McCants; R A Rosati; K L Lee; D B Pryor
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1986-12-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Natural history and predictors of outcome for non-cardiac chest pain: a prospective 4-year cohort study.

Authors:  G D Eslick; N J Talley
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 3.598

9.  Health-related quality of life in non-cardiac chest pain patients with and without panic disorder.

Authors:  Toril Dammen; Øivind Ekeberg; Harald Arnesen; Svein Friis
Journal:  Int J Psychiatry Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.210

10.  The Canadian C-spine rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma.

Authors:  Ian G Stiell; Catherine M Clement; R Douglas McKnight; Robert Brison; Michael J Schull; Brian H Rowe; James R Worthington; Mary A Eisenhauer; Daniel Cass; Gary Greenberg; Iain MacPhail; Jonathan Dreyer; Jacques S Lee; Glen Bandiera; Mark Reardon; Brian Holroyd; Howard Lesiuk; George A Wells
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-12-25       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.