Literature DB >> 24162764

Superior canal dehiscence syndrome: clinical manifestations and radiologic correlations.

Issam Saliba1, Anastasios Maniakas, Lina Zahra Benamira, Jade Nehme, Mélanie Benoit, Véronique Montreuil-Jacques.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to describe the superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) and its vestibule-cochlear manifestations, while analyzing dehiscence size, audiogram and vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) changes following dehiscence obliteration. We conducted a prospective study in a tertiary referral center. All Patients diagnosed and surgically treated for SCDS were operated through a middle fossa craniotomy (MFC). Clinical and radiological data were collected. The main outcome measures were Air-bone gaps, Pure-tone average (PTA), speech discrimination scores (SDS) and VEMP thresholds and were correlated to dehiscence size. 28 patients were included in this study with a mean dehiscence size of 4.68 mm. Phonophobia and imbalance were the most debilitating cochlear and vestibular symptoms, respectively. At 2 months postoperatively, low-frequency air-bone gaps showed a statistically significant improvement (p < 0.001). SDS and PTA did not show any statistically significant changes 2 months postoperatively (p = 0.282 and p = 0.295, respectively). VEMP threshold differences between operated and contralateral ears were statistically significant preoperatively (p < 0.001) and non-significant 2 months postoperatively (p = 0.173). Dehiscence size only showed a statistically significant correlation with preoperative total cochlear symptoms, while remaining insignificant with all other variables measured. Air-bone gaps, VEMP and computerized tomography remain essential tools in diagnosing and following SCDS. Dehiscence size is an independent factor in the analysis of SCDS, with cochlear symptomatology being associated to dehiscence sizes. Finally, it is shown that overall symptomatology, audiometric results and VEMP thresholds return to normal values post-obliteration, confirming the continuing success of the MFC approach for SCDS obliteration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24162764     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-013-2711-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  29 in total

1.  Transmastoid approach for resurfacing of Superior Semicircular Canal dehiscence.

Authors:  M Crovetto; E Areitio; J Elexpuru; F Aguayo
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 1.863

2.  Transmastoid repair of superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Authors:  M V Kirtane; A Sharma; D Satwalekar
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 1.469

3.  Multislice computed tomography in the diagnosis of superior canal dehiscence: how much error, and how to minimize it?

Authors:  Tanya S Tavassolie; Richard T Penninger; M Geraldine Zuñiga; Lloyd B Minor; John Patrick Carey
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Sound- and/or pressure-induced vertigo due to bone dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal.

Authors:  L B Minor; D Solomon; J S Zinreich; D S Zee
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1998-03

5.  Transmastoid resurfacing of superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Authors:  Hosam A Amoodi; Fawaz M Makki; Michael McNeil; Manohar Bance
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Operative management of superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Authors:  Anthony A Mikulec; Dennis S Poe; Michael J McKenna
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  A dehiscent superior semicircular canal may be plugged and resurfaced via the transmastoid route.

Authors:  Francesco Fiorino; Franco Barbieri; Francesca B Pizzini; Alberto Beltramello
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Superior semicircular canal dehiscence: positive predictive value of high-resolution CT scanning.

Authors:  Jean-François Cloutier; Manon Bélair; Issam Saliba
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  CT evaluation of bone dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal as a cause of sound- and/or pressure-induced vertigo.

Authors:  Clifford J Belden; Noah Weg; Lloyd B Minor; S James Zinreich
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Outpatient repair of superior semicircular canal dehiscence via the transmastoid approach.

Authors:  Geoffrey R Deschenes; Daniel P Hsu; Cliff A Megerian
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  6 in total

1.  The effect of superior canal dehiscence size and location on audiometric measurements, vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials and video-head impulse testing.

Authors:  Andrea Castellucci; Gianluca Piras; Valeria Del Vecchio; Francesco Maria Crocetta; Vincenzo Maiolo; Gian Gaetano Ferri; Angelo Ghidini; Cristina Brandolini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Correlation of Superior Canal Dehiscence Surface Area With Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials, Audiometric Thresholds, and Dizziness Handicap.

Authors:  Jacob B Hunter; Brendan P O'Connell; Jianing Wang; Srijata Chakravorti; Katie Makowiec; Matthew L Carlson; Benoit Dawant; Devin L McCaslin; Jack H Noble; George B Wanna
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 3.  Use of cone beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Authors:  Ilson Sepúlveda; Thomas Schmidt; Enrique Platín
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2014-09-23

4.  Common features in patients with superior canal dehiscence declining surgical treatment.

Authors:  Lina Zahra Benamira; Anastasios Maniakas; Musaed Alzahrani; Issam Saliba
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2015-03-01

Review 5.  The Contributions of Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials and Acoustic Vestibular Stimulation to Our Understanding of the Vestibular System.

Authors:  Sally M Rosengren; James G Colebatch
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Can Wideband Tympanometry Be Used as a Screening Test for Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence?

Authors:  Emine Demir; Nazife Nur Afacan; Metin Celiker; Fatma Beyazal Celiker; Mehmet Fatih İnecikli; Suat Terzi; Engin Dursun
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.372

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.