Literature DB >> 24162478

Pollen markers for gene-centromere mapping in diploid potato.

H J Bastiaanssen1, M S Ramanna, Z Sawor, A Mincione, A V Steen, E Jacobsen.   

Abstract

The utility of two pollen genetic markers for estimating the extent of meiotic recombination between the centromere and a marker gene was tested in 2n pollen of diploid potato clones. One of these markers was the distal locus amylose-free (amf) on chromosome 8 and the other was the isozyme locus alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh-1) on chromosome 4. In the case of the amf locus, the gene-centromere distance was estimated in a normal synaptic and a desynaptic genotype. In both cases the genetic analysis was confined to: (1) a direct estimation of the phenotypic (blue vs red) segregation ratios in FDR (first-division restitution) 2n pollen and (2) a classification of the 4 x progeny from 4x (nulliplex amf) x 2x (Amf/amf) crosses into duplex, simplex and nulliplex classes. The recombination frequency between the centromere and the amf locus in the normal synaptic genotype B92-7015-4 corresponded to a gene-centromere distance of 48.8 cM, whereas this distance amounted to 13.3 cM in the desynaptic genotype RS93-8025-1. Hence desynapsis reduced crossing-over by 73%. The observed genetic distance of 48.8 cM in the normal synaptic clone, B92-7015-4, is the highest gene-centromere distance reported so far in potato and this could be explained on the assumption of absolute chiasma interference. For the Adh-1 locus, it was found that heterozygous 2n pollen grains could be detected in pollen samples of the diploid clones, because of the occurrence of a heterodimeric band of the isozyme. Unlike the amf locus, the genecentromere distance for the Adh-1 locus was estimated only on the basis of the duplex, simplex and nulliplex classes in the progenies from 4x (nulliplex Adh-1 (2) )x B92-7015-4 (Adh-1 (1) /Adh-1 (2) )crosses and was found to be 19.4 cM. Because the accurate positions of centromeres in relation to other loci are not available in the existing genetic maps of potato, which are saturated with molecular markers, halftetrad analysis is a promising additional approach to the basic genetics of this crop.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 24162478     DOI: 10.1007/BF00230122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  20 in total

1.  High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes.

Authors:  S D Tanksley; M W Ganal; J P Prince; M C de Vicente; M W Bonierbale; P Broun; T M Fulton; J J Giovannoni; S Grandillo; G B Martin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genetic and molecular characterization of an Adh-1 null mutant in tomato.

Authors:  E Wisman; M Koornneef; T Chase; E Lifshytz; M S Ramanna; P Zabel
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1991-04

3.  Crossing over and Diploid Egg Formation in the Elongate Mutant of Maize.

Authors:  P M Nel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Evidence for Extensive Overlap of Sporophytic and Gametophytic Gene Expression in Lycopersicon esculentum.

Authors:  S D Tanksley; D Zamir; C M Rick
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-07-24       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The dosage effect of the wildtype GBSS allele is linear for GBSS activity but not for amylose content: absence of amylose has a distinct influence on the physico-chemical properties of starch.

Authors:  E Flipse; C J Keetels; E Jacobsen; R G Visser
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Heterozygosity in 2n gametes of potato evaluated by RFLP markers.

Authors:  A Barone; C Gebhardt; L Frusciante
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Centromere-linkage analysis and consolidation of the zebrafish genetic map.

Authors:  S L Johnson; M A Gates; M Johnson; W S Talbot; S Horne; K Baik; S Rude; J R Wong; J H Postlethwait
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Two-dimensional spreads of synaptonemal complexes from solanaceous plants. VI. High-resolution recombination nodule map for tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum).

Authors:  J D Sherman; S M Stack
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Application of the ovarian teratoma mapping method in the mouse.

Authors:  J T Eppig; E M Eicher
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Gene-centromere mapping of bovine DYA, DRB3, and PRL using secondary oocytes and first polar bodies: evidence for four-strand double crossovers between DYA and DRB3.

Authors:  V L Jarrell; H A Lewin; Y Da; M B Wheeler
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1995-05-01       Impact factor: 5.736

View more
  5 in total

1.  Genetic positioning of centromeres using half-tetrad analysis in a 4x-2x cross population of potato.

Authors:  Tae-Ho Park; Jong-Bo Kim; Ronald C B Hutten; Herman J van Eck; Evert Jacobsen; Richard G F Visser
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-03-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genetic positioning of centromeres through half-tetrad analysis in gynogenetic diploid families of the Zhikong scallop (Chlamys farreri).

Authors:  Hongtao Nie; Qi Li; Xuelin Zhao; Lingfeng Kong
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Ploidy manipulation of the gametophyte, endosperm and sporophyte in nature and for crop improvement: a tribute to Professor Stanley J. Peloquin (1921-2008).

Authors:  Rodomiro Ortiz; Philipp Simon; Shelley Jansky; David Stelly
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Genetic mapping of centromeres in the nine Citrus clementina chromosomes using half-tetrad analysis and recombination patterns in unreduced and haploid gametes.

Authors:  Pablo Aleza; José Cuenca; María Hernández; José Juárez; Luis Navarro; Patrick Ollitrault
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 4.215

5.  Centromere localization for Bighead Carp (Aristichthys nobilis) through half-tetrad analysis in diploid gynogenetic families.

Authors:  Chuankun Zhu; Yanhong Sun; Xiaomu Yu; Jingou Tong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.