Literature DB >> 24162308

Electromagnetic interference from lasers and intense light sources in the treatment of patients with artificial pacemakers and other implantable cardiac devices.

Tom Lister1, Lindsay Grant, Siu-Man Lee, Richard P Cole, Anthony Jones, Timothy Taylor, Angela Mayo, Philip A Wright.   

Abstract

Measurements of the electric and magnetic field strengths surrounding six laser systems and one intense pulsed light system were carried out. The results were compared to exposure limits published by cardiac device manufacturers to assess the risk of electromagnetic interference to implantable cardiac devices such as pacemakers or implantable cardioverter defibrillators. The majority of lasers assessed in this study were found to produce electric and magnetic field strengths below the published exposure limits for cardiac devices. However, the low-frequency electric field and static magnetic field of both the CO2 laser and the ruby laser were found to exceed these limits. Ensuring that a small separation is maintained at all times between the laser unit and any patient with a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator appears to be a sensible expedient in avoiding overexposure of an implantable cardiac device to electromagnetic interference. Due to the single-shot fast discharge nature of the intense pulsed light system, changes in electromagnetic field strength were too fast for some of the measuring equipment used in this study to register accurate readings during operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24162308     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-013-1470-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  3 in total

1.  Reasons for escalating pacemaker implants.

Authors:  David Birnie; Kathryn Williams; Ann Guo; Lisa Mielniczuk; Darryl Davis; Robert Lemery; Martin Green; Michael Gollob; Anthony Tang
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2006-05-06       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  The 11th world survey of cardiac pacing and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: calendar year 2009--a World Society of Arrhythmia's project.

Authors:  Harry G Mond; Alessandro Proclemer
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 1.976

3.  An in vitro evaluation of electromagnetic interference between implantable cardiac devices and ophthalmic laser systems.

Authors:  Neal A Sher; Mikhail P Golben; Kathleen Kresge; Larry Selznick; Selcuk Adabag
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 5.214

  3 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Management of cardiac implantable electronic devices during interventional pulmonology procedures.

Authors:  Abhishek Kumar; Samjot Singh Dhillon; Spandan Patel; Matthias Grube; Amit Noheria
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Management of Patients With Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Dental, Oral, and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Authors:  James Tom
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2016

3.  Influence and safety of electronic apex locators in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mothanna K AlRahabi; Hani M Ghabbani
Journal:  Libyan J Med       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.657

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.