Literature DB >> 24162260

Delaying skeletal-related events in a randomized phase 3 study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in patients with advanced cancer: an analysis of data from patients with solid tumors.

David Henry1, Saroj Vadhan-Raj, Vera Hirsh, Roger von Moos, Vania Hungria, Luis Costa, Penella J Woll, Giorgio Scagliotti, Geoffrey Smith, Amy Feng, Susie Jun, Roger Dansey, Howard Yeh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Bone complications of metastatic disease, including skeletal-related events (SREs), impair patients' functioning and quality of life. In a randomized, phase 3 trial of 1,776 patients with metastases from solid tumors (except breast or prostate) or multiple myeloma, denosumab was non-inferior to zoledronic acid (ZA) in delaying or preventing SREs. This ad hoc analysis reports outcomes in the subgroup of 1,597 patients with solid tumors, excluding patients with multiple myeloma.
METHODS: Patients received monthly subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg or intravenous ZA 4 mg, adjusted for creatinine clearance, with calcium and vitamin D supplementation recommended. Endpoints included times to first on-study SRE, first-and-subsequent SREs, and pain worsening.
RESULTS: Denosumab significantly delayed time to first on-study SRE compared with ZA (HR, 0.81; 95 % CI, 0.68-0.96) and time to first-and-subsequent SREs (RR, 0.85; 95 % CI, 0.72-1.00). Denosumab also significantly delayed time to development of moderate or severe pain (HR, 0.81; 95 % CI, 0.66-1.00), pain worsening (HR, 0.83; 95 % CI, 0.71-0.97), and worsening pain interference in patients with no/mild baseline pain (HR, 0.77; 95 % CI, 0.61-0.96). Adverse event rates were 96 % in both groups. Grade 3 or 4 hypocalcemia, mostly without clinical sequelae, was more frequent in denosumab-treated patients (denosumab 4 %, ZA 2 %). Osteonecrosis of the jaw occurred infrequently (denosumab 0.8 %, ZA 1.1 %).
CONCLUSIONS: Denosumab was more effective in delaying or preventing SREs in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors and also prevented pain progression compared to ZA in this ad hoc analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24162260     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-013-2022-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  21 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of bone metastasis.

Authors:  G David Roodman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Molecular biology of bone metastasis.

Authors:  Lauren A Kingsley; Pierrick G J Fournier; John M Chirgwin; Theresa A Guise
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.261

3.  Survival analysis of patients with femoral metastases.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Elisa Pala; Carlo Romagnoli; Matteo Romantini; Teresa Calabro; Pietro Ruggieri
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 4.  The measurement of pain from metastatic bone disease: capturing the patient's experience.

Authors:  Charles S Cleeland
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Randomized, double-blind study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced cancer (excluding breast and prostate cancer) or multiple myeloma.

Authors:  David H Henry; Luis Costa; Francois Goldwasser; Vera Hirsh; Vania Hungria; Jana Prausova; Giorgio Vittorio Scagliotti; Harm Sleeboom; Andrew Spencer; Saroj Vadhan-Raj; Roger von Moos; Wolfgang Willenbacher; Penella J Woll; Jianming Wang; Qi Jiang; Susie Jun; Roger Dansey; Howard Yeh
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  The RANK/RANKL/OPG triad in cancer-induced bone diseases.

Authors:  William C Dougall; Michelle Chaisson
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 9.264

7.  Monitoring of renal function in cancer patients: an ongoing challenge for clinical practice.

Authors:  M Kleber; M Cybulla; K Bauchmüller; G Ihorst; B Koch; M Engelhardt
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Long-term efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid in the treatment of skeletal metastases in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma and other solid tumors: a randomized, Phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Lee S Rosen; David Gordon; N Simon Tchekmedyian; Ronald Yanagihara; Vera Hirsh; Maciej Krzakowski; Marek Pawlicki; Paul De Souza; Ming Zheng; Gladys Urbanowitz; Dirk Reitsma; John Seaman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Prevalence of renal insufficiency in breast cancer patients and related pharmacological issues.

Authors:  Vincent Launay-Vacher; Joseph Gligorov; Christophe Le Tourneau; Nicolas Janus; Jean-Philippe Spano; Isabelle Ray-Coquard; Stéphane Oudard; Xavier Pourrat; Jean-François Morere; Gilbert Deray; Philippe Beuzeboc
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events: a combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials.

Authors:  Allan Lipton; Karim Fizazi; Alison T Stopeck; David H Henry; Janet E Brown; Denise A Yardley; Gary E Richardson; Salvatore Siena; Pablo Maroto; Michael Clemens; Boris Bilynskyy; Veena Charu; Philippe Beuzeboc; Michael Rader; Maria Viniegra; Fred Saad; Chunlei Ke; Ada Braun; Susie Jun
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 9.162

View more
  55 in total

1.  Physician preferences for bone metastasis drug therapy in Canada.

Authors:  J Arellano; J M González; Y Qian; M Habib; A F Mohamed; F Gatta; A B Hauber; J Posner; N Califaretti; E Chow
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  2019 European Thyroid Association Guidelines for the Treatment and Follow-Up of Advanced Radioiodine-Refractory Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Laura Fugazzola; Rossella Elisei; Dagmar Fuhrer; Barbara Jarzab; Sophie Leboulleux; Kate Newbold; Jan Smit
Journal:  Eur Thyroid J       Date:  2019-08-28

Review 3.  Bone-targeted therapy in metastatic breast cancer - all well-established knowledge?

Authors:  Simon P Gampenrieder; Gabriel Rinnerthaler; Richard Greil
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Denosumab compared with zoledronic acid on PFS in multiple myeloma: exploratory results of an international phase 3 study.

Authors:  Evangelos Terpos; Noopur Raje; Peter Croucher; Ramon Garcia-Sanz; Xavier Leleu; Waltraud Pasteiner; Yang Wang; Anthony Glennane; Jude Canon; Charlotte Pawlyn
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-02-09

5.  Retrospective Review of Atypical Femoral Fracture in Metastatic Bone Disease Patients Receiving Denosumab Therapy.

Authors:  Samantha Peiling Yang; Tae Won B Kim; Patrick J Boland; Azeez Farooki
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-03-08

6.  Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) in renal cell cancer patients after treatment including zoledronic acid or denosumab.

Authors:  Vittorio Fusco; Alberto Bedogni; Giuseppina Campisi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Skeletal related events in patients with bone metastasis arising from non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Gustavo Telles da Silva; Anke Bergmann; Luiz Claudio Santos Thuler
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Lack of evidence regarding bone metastases of genitourinary cancers: interventions by surgery, radiotherapy, and bone-targeted systemic therapy.

Authors:  Makito Miyake; Takuya Owari; Kiyohide Fujimoto
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-07

Review 9.  Bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma: an updated network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rahul Mhaskar; Ambuj Kumar; Branko Miladinovic; Benjamin Djulbegovic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-12-18

Review 10.  Mechanisms of action of therapeutic antibodies for cancer.

Authors:  J M Redman; E M Hill; D AlDeghaither; L M Weiner
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 4.407

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.