Literature DB >> 24161387

Physiological responses to spinal manipulation therapy: investigation of the relationship between electromyographic responses and peak force.

François Nougarou1, Claude Dugas, Constance Deslauriers, Isabelle Pagé, Martin Descarreaux.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: It is believed that systematic modulation of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) parameters should yield varying levels of physiological responses and eventually a range of clinical responses. However, investigation of SMT dose-physiological response relationship is recent and has mostly been conducted using animal or cadaveric models. The main objective of the present study is to investigate SMT dose-physiological response relation in humans by determining how different levels of force can modify electromyographic (EMG) responses to spinal manipulation.
METHODS: Twenty-six participants were subjected to 2 trials of 4 different SMT force-time profiles using a servo-controlled linear actuator motor. Normalized EMG activity of paraspinal muscles (left and right muscles at level T6 and T8) was recorded during and after SMT, and EMG values were compared across the varying levels of force.
RESULTS: Increasing the level of force yielded an increase in paraspinal muscle EMG activity during the thrust phase of SMT but also in the two 250-millisecond time windows after the spinal manipulation impulse. These muscle activations quickly attenuated (500 milliseconds after spinal manipulation impulse).
CONCLUSION: The study confirmed the presence of a local paraspinal EMG response after SMT and highlighted the linear relationship between the SMT peak force and paraspinal muscle activation.
© 2013. Published by National University of Health Sciences All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Dose Response Relationship; Electromyography; Force; Manipulation; Spinal

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24161387     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  19 in total

1.  What effect can manual therapy have on a patient's pain experience?

Authors:  Mark D Bishop; Rafael Torres-Cueco; Charles W Gay; Enrique Lluch-Girbés; Jason M Beneciuk; Joel E Bialosky
Journal:  Pain Manag       Date:  2015-09-24

2.  Correlation of expertise with error detection skills of force application during spinal manipulation learning.

Authors:  Michel Loranger; Julien Treboz; Jean-Alexandre Boucher; François Nougarou; Claude Dugas; Martin Descarreaux
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2015-08-13

3.  Neural responses to the mechanical characteristics of high velocity, low amplitude spinal manipulation: Effect of specific contact site.

Authors:  William R Reed; Cynthia R Long; Gregory N Kawchuk; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2015-03-27

4.  The effect of spinal manipulation impulse duration on spine neuromechanical responses.

Authors:  Isabelle Pagé; François Nougarou; Claude Dugas; Martin Descarreaux
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-06

5.  Effect of spinal manipulation thrust magnitude on trunk mechanical activation thresholds of lateral thalamic neurons.

Authors:  William R Reed; Joel G Pickar; Randall S Sozio; Cynthia R Long
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.437

6.  Decreased spontaneous activity and altered evoked nociceptive response of rat thalamic submedius neurons to lumbar vertebra thrust.

Authors:  William R Reed; Jamie T Cranston; Stephen M Onifer; Joshua W Little; Randall S Sozio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Immediate changes after manual therapy in resting-state functional connectivity as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging in participants with induced low back pain.

Authors:  Charles W Gay; Michael E Robinson; Steven Z George; William M Perlstein; Mark D Bishop
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 1.437

8.  Effect of spinal manipulation thrust duration on trunk mechanical activation thresholds of nociceptive-specific lateral thalamic neurons.

Authors:  William R Reed; Randall Sozio; Joel G Pickar; Stephen M Onifer
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 1.437

9.  Evidence for increased neuromuscular drive following spinal manipulation in individuals with subacromial pain syndrome.

Authors:  Amy K Hegarty; Melody Hsu; Jean-Sébastien Roy; Joseph R Kardouni; Jason J Kutch; Lori A Michener
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 10.  The contemporary model of vertebral column joint dysfunction and impact of high-velocity, low-amplitude controlled vertebral thrusts on neuromuscular function.

Authors:  Heidi Haavik; Nitika Kumari; Kelly Holt; Imran Khan Niazi; Imran Amjad; Amit N Pujari; Kemal Sitki Türker; Bernadette Murphy
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.