Literature DB >> 24161273

Impact of time on quality of motor control of the paretic upper limb after stroke.

Joost van Kordelaar1, Erwin van Wegen1, Gert Kwakkel2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish the time course of recovery regarding smoothness of upper limb movements in the first 6 months poststroke.
DESIGN: Cohort study with 3-dimensional kinematic measurements in weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 12, and 26 poststroke.
SETTING: Onsite 3-dimensional kinematic measurements in stroke units, rehabilitation centers, nursing homes, and patients' homes. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=44; 19 women, 25 men; mean age ± SD, 58±12y) with a first-ever unilateral ischemic stroke and incomplete upper limb paresis (27 left sided, 17 right sided) were included.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In each measurement, an electromagnetic motion tracker acquired hand and finger trajectories during a reach-to-grasp task. Movement duration was determined, and smoothness of hand transport and grasp aperture was quantified by normalized jerk. With the use of random coefficient analysis, the effect of progress of time on smoothness of hand transport and grasp aperture was investigated.
RESULTS: During the first 5 weeks poststroke, there was a significant contribution of progress of time to reductions in movement duration and normalized jerk of hand transport and grasp aperture (P<.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The present longitudinal 3-dimensional kinematic study showed that smoothness of paretic upper limb movements improves in the first 8 weeks poststroke. This improvement suggests that motor control normalizes in the first 8 weeks poststroke and can be mostly explained by spontaneous neurologic recovery that occurs typically in the first weeks poststroke. Future 3-dimensional kinematic studies should investigate whether therapies starting early after stroke can improve the quality of motor control beyond spontaneous neurologic recovery.
Copyright © 2014 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; MD; NJ; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Upper extremity; movement duration; normalized jerk

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24161273     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  30 in total

1.  Kinematic Analysis Using 3D Motion Capture of Drinking Task in People With and Without Upper-extremity Impairments.

Authors:  Margit Alt Murphy; Steve Murphy; Hanna C Persson; Ulla-Britt Bergström; Katharina Stibrant Sunnerhagen
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Using Vision to Study Poststroke Recovery and Test Hypotheses About Neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Ania Busza; Colleen L Schneider; Zoë R Williams; Bradford Z Mahon; Bogachan Sahin
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  A Short and Distinct Time Window for Recovery of Arm Motor Control Early After Stroke Revealed With a Global Measure of Trajectory Kinematics.

Authors:  Juan C Cortes; Jeff Goldsmith; Michelle D Harran; Jing Xu; Nathan Kim; Heidi M Schambra; Andreas R Luft; Pablo Celnik; John W Krakauer; Tomoko Kitago
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.919

4.  Evidence for a Window of Enhanced Plasticity in the Human Motor Cortex Following Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Brenton Hordacre; Duncan Austin; Katlyn E Brown; Lynton Graetz; Isabel Pareés; Stefania De Trane; Ann-Maree Vallence; Simon Koblar; Timothy Kleinig; Michelle N McDonnell; Richard Greenwood; Michael C Ridding; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  Interrater reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test-Functional Ability Scale: why it matters.

Authors:  Susan V Duff; Jiaxiu He; Monica A Nelsen; Christianne J Lane; Veronica T Rowe; Steve L Wolf; Alexander W Dromerick; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.919

6.  A "matched" sensory reference can guide goal-directed movements of the affected hand in central post-stroke sensory ataxia.

Authors:  Michihiro Osumi; Masahiko Sumitani; Yuko Otake; Shu Morioka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The feasibility of an acute high-intensity exercise bout to promote locomotor learning after stroke.

Authors:  Charalambos C Charalambous; Erin E Helm; Kristin A Lau; Susanne M Morton; Darcy S Reisman
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2017-11-05       Impact factor: 2.119

Review 8.  Translational Hurdles in Stroke Recovery Studies.

Authors:  Jukka Jolkkonen; Gert Kwakkel
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 6.829

Review 9.  Caregiver-mediated exercises for improving outcomes after stroke.

Authors:  Judith Dm Vloothuis; Marijn Mulder; Janne M Veerbeek; Manin Konijnenbelt; Johanna Ma Visser-Meily; Johannes Cf Ket; Gert Kwakkel; Erwin Eh van Wegen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-12-21

Review 10.  Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke.

Authors:  Gert Kwakkel; Janne M Veerbeek; Erwin E H van Wegen; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 44.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.