Literature DB >> 2416054

Expression of the Rous sarcoma virus pol gene by ribosomal frameshifting.

T Jacks, H E Varmus.   

Abstract

The pol gene of Rous sarcoma virus is positioned downstream of the gag gene in a different, briefly overlapping reading frame; nevertheless, the primary translation product of pol is a gag-pol fusion protein. Two mechanisms, ribosomal frameshifting and RNA splicing, have been considered to explain this phenomenon. The frameshifting model is supported by synthesis of both gag protein and gag-pol fusion protein in a cell-free mammalian translation system programmed by a single RNA species that was synthesized from cloned viral DNA with a bacteriophage RNA polymerase. Under these conditions, the ratio of the gag protein to the fusion protein (about 20 to 1) is similar to that previously observed in infected cells, the frameshifting is specific for the gag-pol junction, and it is unaffected by large deletions in gag. In addition, synthesis of the fusion protein is ten times less efficient in an Escherichia coli cell-free translation system and cannot be explained by transcriptional errors or in vitro modification of the RNA. Ribosomal frameshifting may affect production of other proteins in higher eukaryotes, including proteins encoded by several retroviruses and transposable elements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2416054     DOI: 10.1126/science.2416054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  220 in total

1.  The versatility of paramyxovirus RNA polymerase stuttering.

Authors:  S Hausmann; D Garcin; C Delenda; D Kolakofsky
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Translational suppressors and antisuppressors alter the efficiency of the Ty1 programmed translational frameshift.

Authors:  C L Burck; Y O Chernoff; R Liu; P J Farabaugh; S W Liebman
Journal:  RNA       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.942

3.  Mass determination of rous sarcoma virus virions by scanning transmission electron microscopy.

Authors:  V M Vogt; M N Simon
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 4.  Translational control of viral gene expression in eukaryotes.

Authors:  M Gale; S L Tan; M G Katze
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.056

5.  Kinetics of ribosomal pausing during programmed -1 translational frameshifting.

Authors:  J D Lopinski; J D Dinman; J A Bruenn
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Structural analysis of the -1 ribosomal frameshift elements in giardiavirus mRNA.

Authors:  L Li; A L Wang; C C Wang
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Translation controls the expression level of a chimaeric reporter gene.

Authors:  L A Hensgens; M W Fornerod; S Rueb; A A Winkler; S van der Veen; R A Schilperoort
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.076

8.  Efficiency of a programmed -1 ribosomal frameshift in the different subtypes of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 group M.

Authors:  Martin Baril; Dominic Dulude; Karine Gendron; Guy Lemay; Léa Brakier-Gingras
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.942

Review 9.  Fidelity at the molecular level: lessons from protein synthesis.

Authors:  Hani S Zaher; Rachel Green
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Ribosomal frameshifting during translation of measles virus P protein mRNA is capable of directing synthesis of a unique protein.

Authors:  P Liston; D J Briedis
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.