Will nonablative rejuvenation replace ablative lasers? Facts and controversies.

Since the early 1980s, the field of skin rejuvenation has evolved rapidly. Traditional ablative resurfacing with carbon dioxide and Er:YAG lasers offered dramatic improvement of the skin tone and texture, but prolonged postoperative period and an increased risk for side effects and complications were unacceptable for the majority of patients. It prompted the development of nonablative lasers and non-laser systems, which stimulate dermal neocollagenesis without epidermal disruption, and therefore, produce less adverse effects with little or no healing time. Recently, fractional nonablative and ablative lasers have been introduced, employing a completely new concept of fractional photothermolysis, which ensures high efficacy and fewer risks. Ablative laser resurfacing still remains the gold standard for treating advanced and severe photoaging providing excellent results in experienced hands. Alternatively, ablative fractional resurfacing can be used, with the results, which are comparable to fully ablative lasers with better standard of safety. Nonablative resurfacing is ideal for patients under the age of 50 years with minimal facial sagging, and for those who are unwilling to undergo expensive and demanding ablative procedures. It can be concluded that the key of therapeutic success is in proper patient selection, setting appropriate expectations and combining different rejuvenation technologies with other therapeutic modalities, such as botulinum toxin and fillers.