Literature DB >> 24158426

Perceived usefulness of data entry tools in medical encounters: a survey.

Ufuk Celikkan1, Yasar Guneri Sahin, Fisun Senuzun.   

Abstract

Electronic Health Records allows direct data entry and is an important factor for accurate diagnosis. However, two drawbacks of this system is the time needed to create them, which can reduce health care professional productivity, and the fact that it is error prone. It is important, therefore, to select the most appropriate methods and tools for data entry by the health care providers at the point of care in order to minimize a loss of productivity. The study aims to understand health care professionals' perceptions of the data entry process, and determine the appropriate methods, tools and functions that would facilitate the process, minimize loss of productivity and improve quality. A questionnaire which consisting of 18 basic questions (including demographic data) was posted on a web site which hosts questionnaires, on an established online community space and also mailed to health care professionals who are working in various hospitals for a duration of 10 months. Totally, 533 medical care professionals who are primarily from Turkey participated in the survey, of which 284 were medical doctors, 127 were nurses and the rest, other medical professionals. While the clear majority of participants involved in data entry use keyboard and mouse, most expressed a preference for more convenient methods, such as voice recognition or touch screen. Furthermore, physicians reported rarely spending more than 15 min for each consultation and conducting 21-30 examinations a day. The main motivation for creating an efficient direct data entry is to increase time allowed for patient examination, and to improve accuracy of diagnosis. Despite a heavy workload, health care professionals are very receptive to the idea of using a convenient data entry tool and keeping electronic patient records. Emergent data entry technologies in health sector can improve the quality of examinations, physicians' productivity and can decrease the percentage of medical misdiagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24158426     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-013-9988-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  23 in total

1.  Evaluation of clinician response to wireless technology.

Authors:  C A Seckman; C A Romano; S Marden
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

2.  Internet use by the public to search for health-related information.

Authors:  Khalid M AlGhamdi; Noura A Moussa
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 4.046

3.  Factors and forces affecting EHR system adoption: report of a 2004 ACMI discussion.

Authors:  Joan S Ash; David W Bates
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-10-18       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  You've led the horse to water, now how do you get him to drink: managing change and increasing utilization of computerized provider order entry.

Authors:  Donald Levick; Harry F Lukens; Paula L Stillman
Journal:  J Healthc Inf Manag       Date:  2005

5.  Physicians, patients, and the electronic health record: an ethnographic analysis.

Authors:  William Ventres; Sarah Kooienga; Nancy Vuckovic; Ryan Marlin; Peggy Nygren; Valerie Stewart
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  MEDWISE: an innovative public health information system infrastructure.

Authors:  Yasar Guneri Sahin; Ufuk Celikkan
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Effects of exam-room computing on clinician-patient communication: a longitudinal qualitative study.

Authors:  Richard Frankel; Andrea Altschuler; Sheba George; James Kinsman; Holly Jimison; Nan R Robertson; John Hsu
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Barriers to electronic health record use during patient visits.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Linder; Jeffrey L Schnipper; Ruslana Tsurikova; Andrea J Melnikas; Lynn A Volk; Blackford Middleton
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

9.  Doctor-patient communication: a comparison of the USA and Japan.

Authors:  Sachiko Ohtaki; Toshio Ohtaki; Michael D Fetters
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 10.  Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature.

Authors:  Kristiina Häyrinen; Kaija Saranto; Pirkko Nykänen
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 4.046

View more
  1 in total

1.  A usability framework for speech recognition technologies in clinical handover: a pre-implementation study.

Authors:  Linda Dawson; Maree Johnson; Hanna Suominen; Jim Basilakis; Paula Sanchez; Dominique Estival; Barbara Kelly; Leif Hanlen
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 4.460

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.