Literature DB >> 24156961

Five-year clinical and functional multislice computed tomography angiographic results after coronary implantation of the fully resorbable polymeric everolimus-eluting scaffold in patients with de novo coronary artery disease: the ABSORB cohort A trial.

Yoshinobu Onuma1, Dariusz Dudek, Leif Thuesen, Mark Webster, Koen Nieman, Hector M Garcia-Garcia, John A Ormiston, Patrick W Serruys.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to demonstrate the 5-year clinical and functional multislice computed tomography angiographic results after implantation of the fully resorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold (Absorb BVS, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California).
BACKGROUND: Multimodality imaging of the first-in-humans trial using a ABSORB BVS scaffold demonstrated at 2 years the bioresorption of the device while preventing restenosis. However, the long-term safety and efficacy of this therapy remain to be documented.
METHODS: In the ABSORB cohort A trial (ABSORB Clinical Investigation, Cohort A [ABSORB A] Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System Clinical Investigation), 30 patients with a single de novo coronary artery lesion were treated with the fully resorbable everolimus-eluting Absorb scaffold at 4 centers. As an optional investigation in 3 of the 4 centers, the patients underwent multislice computed tomography (MSCT) angiography at 18 months and 5 years. Acquired MSCT data were analyzed at an independent core laboratory (Cardialysis, Rotterdam, the Netherlands) for quantitative analysis of lumen dimensions and was further processed for calculation of fractional flow reserve (FFR) at another independent core laboratory (Heart Flow, Redwood City, California).
RESULTS: Five-year clinical follow-up is available for 29 patients. One patient withdrew consent after 6 months, but the vital status of this patient remains available. At 46 days, 1 patient experienced a single episode of chest pain and underwent a target lesion revascularization with a slight troponin increase after the procedure. At 5 years, the ischemia-driven major adverse cardiac event rate of 3.4% remained unchanged. Clopidogrel was discontinued in all but 1 patient. Scaffold thrombosis was not observed in any patient. Two noncardiac deaths were reported, 1 caused by duodenal perforation and the other from Hodgkin's disease. At 5 years, 18 patients underwent MSCT angiography. All scaffolds were patent, with a median minimal lumen area of 3.25 mm(2) (interquartile range: 2.20 to 4.30). Noninvasive FFR analysis was feasible in 13 of 18 scans, which yielded a median distal FFR of 0.86 (interquartile range: 0.82 to 0.94).
CONCLUSIONS: The low event rate at 5 years suggests sustained safety after the implantation of a fully bioresorbable Absorb everolimus-eluting scaffold. Noninvasive assessment of the coronary artery with an option of functional assessment could be an alternative to invasive imaging after treatment of coronary narrowing with such a polymeric bioresorbable scaffold. (ABSORB Clinical Investigation, Cohort A [ABSORB A] Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System Clinical Investigation [ABSORB]; NCT00300131).
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT; FFR; FFR(CT); ID; IQR; IVUS; MACE; MI; MSCT; OCT; PDLLA; PLLA; QCA; TLR; TVR; bioresorbable scaffold; computed tomography; everolimus; fractional flow reserve; interquartile range; intravascular ultrasound; ischemia-driven; major adverse cardiac event(s); multislice computed tomography; myocardial infarction; noninvasive fractional flow reserve according to multislice computed tomography; noninvasive functional assessment; optical coherence tomography; poly-d,l-lactide; poly-l-lactide; quantitative coronary angiography; target lesion revascularization; target vessel revascularization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24156961     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  36 in total

1.  Subacute bioresorbable vascular scaffold thrombosis: a report of 2 cases.

Authors:  Hee Hwa Ho; Min Er Ching; Paul Jau Lueng Ong; Yau Wei Ooi
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Fully bioresorption of an Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold after scaffold restenosis.

Authors:  Luis R Goncalves-Ramírez; Hipólito Gutiérrez; Paol Rojas; Carlos Cortés; Ana Serrador; Benigno Ramos; Jairo Toro; Ignacio J Amat-Santos; José A San Román
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.737

3.  How far have we come with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds, and where should we go?

Authors:  Jeehoon Kang; Kyung Woo Park; Hyo Soo Kim
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-06

Review 4.  A review of bioresorbable scaffolds: hype or hope?

Authors:  Huay Cheem Tan; Rajiv Ananthakrishna
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 1.858

5.  Overlapping meta-analyses of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting stents: bringing clarity or confusion?

Authors:  Davide Capodanno
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography for bioresorbable scaffold luminal investigation: a comparison with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Carlos Collet; Yohei Sotomi; Rafael Cavalcante; Taku Asano; Yosuke Miyazaki; Erhan Tenekecioglu; Pieter Kistlaar; Yaping Zeng; Pannipa Suwanasson; Robbert J de Winter; Koen Nieman; Patrick W Serruys; Yoshinobu Onuma
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 7.  Methods to assess bioresorbable vascular scaffold devices behaviour after implantation.

Authors:  Alberto Pernigotti; Elisabetta Moscarella; Giosafat Spitaleri; Claudia Scardino; Kohki Ishida; Salvatore Brugaletta
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 8.  Optical coherence tomography guidance during bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation.

Authors:  Gioel Gabrio Secco; Monica Verdoia; Gianfranco Pistis; Giuseppe De Luca; Matteo Vercellino; Andrea Audo; Rosario Parisi; Maurizio Reale; Giorgio Ballestrero; Paolo Nicola Marino; Carlo Di Mario
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Bioresorbable Scaffolds.

Authors:  Sidakpal Panaich; Theodore Schreiber; Cindy Grines
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2014-08

Review 10.  New-Generation Coronary Stents: Current Data and Future Directions.

Authors:  Ankur Kalra; Hasan Rehman; Sahil Khera; Braghadheeswar Thyagarajan; Deepak L Bhatt; Neal S Kleiman; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.