Literature DB >> 24156061

Compensation of optode sensitivity and position errors in diffuse optical tomography using the approximation error approach.

Meghdoot Mozumder1, Tanja Tarvainen, Simon R Arridge, Jari Kaipio, Ville Kolehmainen.   

Abstract

Diffuse optical tomography is highly sensitive to measurement and modeling errors. Errors in the source and detector coupling and positions can cause significant artifacts in the reconstructed images. Recently the approximation error theory has been proposed to handle modeling errors. In this article, we investigate the feasibility of the approximation error approach to compensate for modeling errors due to inaccurately known optode locations and coupling coefficients. The approach is evaluated with simulations. The results show that the approximation error method can be used to recover from artifacts in reconstructed images due to optode coupling and position errors.

Keywords:  (100.3190) Inverse problems; (170.3010) Image reconstruction techniques; (170.6960) Tomography; (290.7050) Turbid media

Year:  2013        PMID: 24156061      PMCID: PMC3799663          DOI: 10.1364/BOE.4.002015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Opt Express        ISSN: 2156-7085            Impact factor:   3.732


  19 in total

1.  Optode positional calibration in diffuse optical tomography.

Authors:  Jonathan J Stott; Joseph P Culver; Simon R Arridge; David A Boas
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 1.980

2.  Volumetric diffuse optical tomography of brain activity.

Authors:  Joseph P Culver; Andrew M Siegel; Jonathan J Stott; David A Boas
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 3.776

3.  Computational calibration method for optical tomography.

Authors:  Tanja Tarvainen; Ville Kolehmainen; Marko Vauhkonen; Antti Vanne; Adam P Gibson; Martin Schweiger; Simon R Arridge; Jari P Kaipio
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 1.980

4.  Gauss-Newton method for image reconstruction in diffuse optical tomography.

Authors:  Martin Schweiger; Simon R Arridge; Ilkka Nissilä
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Image reconstruction in optical tomography in the presence of coupling errors.

Authors:  Martin Schweiger; Ilkka Nissilä; David A Boas; Simon R Arridge
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 1.980

6.  Spatially variant regularization improves diffuse optical tomography.

Authors:  B W Pogue; T O McBride; J Prewitt; U L Osterberg; K D Paulsen
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 1.980

7.  Compensation for geometric mismodelling by anisotropies in optical tomography.

Authors:  Jenni Heino; Erkki Somersalo; Jari Kaipio
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2005-01-10       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Differential diffuse optical tomography.

Authors:  V Ntziachristos; B Chance; A Yodh
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  1999-11-08       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  A finite element approach for modeling photon transport in tissue.

Authors:  S R Arridge; M Schweiger; M Hiraoka; D T Delpy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Corrections to linear methods for diffuse optical tomography using approximation error modelling.

Authors:  Tanja Tarvainen; Ville Kolehmainen; Jari P Kaipio; Simon R Arridge
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 3.732

View more
  2 in total

1.  Reducing image artifact in diffuse optical tomography by iterative perturbation correction based on multiwavelength measurements.

Authors:  K M Shihab Uddin; Quing Zhu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  An Automated Preprocessing Method for Diffuse Optical Tomography to Improve Breast Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Murad Althobaiti; Hamed Vavadi; Quing Zhu
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-01-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.