Since 1990, the question ‘What is pharmaceutical care’ was usually answered
with Hepler and Strand’s definition: ‘‘Pharmaceutical care is the
responsible provision of drug therapy for the purpose of achieving definite outcomes
that improve a patient’s quality of life’’. 1 Nonetheless, already since 1990 some debate existed about
different elements in this definition, and also different understandings on how this
definition links in with the professional mission of the pharmacist.In further statements, consensus meetings, or position papers, attempts were made to
clarify the controversies around the definition. More than 20 years should be enough to
analyse the definition and its different elements in depth, and (why not) even the term.
But questions still remain. In this joint editorial, we cannot provide solutions but we
can formulate some questions that may help in the clarification process.Does ‘‘the responsible provision of drug therapy’’ mean that
pharmaceutical care is necessarily associated with the provision, (or dispensing) of
drugs (medicines)? When the term medication therapy management (MTM) was introduced in
the US as a substitute for the term pharmaceutical care, a consensus group stated in the
definition that MTM services ‘‘are independent of, but can occur in
conjunction with, the provision of a medication product’’. 2 This could mean that medication therapy management
is not identical to pharmaceutical care, or we should consider provision of drug therapy
not as identical to the provision of a medication product. Otherwise the introduction of
a new term was not necessary, or indeed undesirable. And this leads to another question:
is the provision of drug therapy than something pharmacists do?Does ‘‘the purpose of achieving definite outcomes’’ limit the
process of pharmaceutical care to outcome oriented activities only? Or, in other words,
following Donadedian’s SPO paradigm 3 ,
should we consider that services focused on improving the use of medicines, obviously
with the ultimate aim of improving health outcomes (but not immediately directed to
them), are part of ‘pharmaceutical care’? This would exclude services
devoted to, for instance, improving patients’ medication adherence or
medication-related health literacy, which most probably improve the outcomes as well,
but indirectly.Does the aim to ‘‘improve a patient’s quality of life’’
mean that pharmaceutical care is not implemented to improve clinical or economic
outcomes, following Kozma’s ECHO model 4 ,
or does the definition refer to the remote aim? We should keep in mind that improving
clinical aspects may sometimes improve (or maintain) humanistic outcomes, like quality
of life, but not necessarily. Care may also prolong life, even when it does not affect
its quality. Improving economic outcomes might sometimes even imply that the humanistic
outcomes are neglected.And then, should ‘pharmaceutical care’ always be associated with the
existence of medicine treatment in a given patient? Should we therefore perhaps exclude
educational activities or health promotion activities performed by pharmacists from the
scope of the ‘pharmaceutical care’? Are other pharmacist activities that are
not necessarily associated with medicines parts of the concept, like smoking cessation
programs, condom use promotion, needle exchange, or disease screenings? In other words,
is it care by the pharmacist, or care around pharmaceuticals.Thus, we finally reach the last point where we wonder, is pharmaceutical care a
‘pharmacist-only’ activity? This question could be split into two different
elements for the discussion: may or can other (medical) professionals provide‘
pharmaceutical care’ services? This is a question that we already asked in 2003,
and has still not been resolved. 5 Should we
consider the term ‘pharmacist care’ as an alternative or an equivalent? The
latter term also appeared in studies published in major medical journals 6 , or in some recent articles in pharmacy journals.
7 This is not a simple word change, because
‘pharmaceutical’ is usually associated with the medicinal product and not
with the professional. This same issue led in 2002 to the name change of the American
Pharmaceutical Association to American Pharmacists Association. 8Using dictionaries or on-line thesauruses does not help us to solve this part of the
terminology problem. The main biomedical thesaurus, the MeSH database, defines
‘nursing care’ as ‘‘Care given to patients by nursing service
personnel’’. But it defines ‘dental care’ as ‘‘The
total of dental diagnostic, preventive, and restorative services provided to meet the
needs of a patient’’. Unfortunately, ‘pharmaceutical care’ was
never considered for inclusion in this controlled vocabulary dictionary, in spite of
several requests.Accepting the challenge to answer the above questions may help us to have a clearer
picture of what pharmaceutical care actually is, anno 2013.
Authors: Theresa L Charrois; Monica Zolezzi; Sheri L Koshman; Glen Pearson; Mark Makowsky; Tamara Durec; Ross T Tsuyuki Journal: Pharmacotherapy Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 4.705
Authors: Morris Weinberger; Michael D Murray; David G Marrero; Nancy Brewer; Michael Lykens; Lisa E Harris; Roopa Seshadri; Helena Caffrey; J Franklin Roesner; Faye Smith; A Jeffrey Newell; Joyce C Collins; Clement J McDonald; William M Tierney Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-10-02 Impact factor: 56.272