Literature DB >> 8111809

Economic, clinical, and humanistic outcomes: a planning model for pharmacoeconomic research.

C M Kozma1, C E Reeder, R M Schulz.   

Abstract

Medical, ethical, and societal concerns about costs, access, and quality of care are causing health care practitioners to consider a more comprehensive model for medical decision making. Consequently, interest in research to assess the outcomes of health care has been increasing. The purpose of this paper is to explicate a theoretical framework for identifying, collecting, and using outcomes data to assess the value of pharmaceutical treatment alternatives. Causal relationships between disease, health outcomes, and decisions about medical care interventions (eg, treatment with pharmaceutical products and services) are proposed to address limitations inherent in the traditional medical decision-making model. The Economic, Clinical, and Humanistic Outcomes (ECHO) model depicts the value of a pharmaceutical product or service as a combination of traditional clinical-based outcomes with more contemporary measures of economic efficiency and quality. This integrated approach provides a theoretical basis for considering potential trade-offs among economic, clinical, and humanistic variables in optimizing the allocation of health care resources. The ECHO model is a preliminary step to modeling outcomes from pharmaceutical treatments and services. Data collection instruments need to be developed, and the proposed relationships among outcomes variables should be established empirically. The ECHO model should assist health services researchers in planning, conducting, and evaluating pharmaceutical products and services from a multidimensional perspective.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8111809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  56 in total

Review 1.  Economic evaluation of pharmacy services--fact or fiction?

Authors:  B George; J Silcock
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1999-08

Review 2.  Subjective outcome measurement--a primer.

Authors:  M P Tully; J A Cantrill
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1999-06

Review 3.  Communication of socioeconomic research findings.

Authors:  R J Milne
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  The effect of managed care on prescription drug costs and benefits.

Authors:  A Lyles; F B Palumbo
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  A review of the pharmacoeconomics of pharmaceutical care.

Authors:  R J Plumridge; R E Wojnar-Horton
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Education in pharmacoeconomics: an international multidisciplinary view.

Authors:  Karen L Rascati; Michael F Drummond; Lieven Annemans; Peter G Davey
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Evidence to support development of pharmacy services: how much or how little do we need?

Authors:  Scot H Simpson
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2010-03

8.  A model for curricular quality assessment and improvement.

Authors:  L Douglas Ried
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  Pharmacoeconomics and formulary decision making.

Authors:  L A Sanchez
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  US valuation of health outcomes measured using the PROMIS-29.

Authors:  Benjamin M Craig; Bryce B Reeve; Paul M Brown; David Cella; Ron D Hays; Joseph Lipscomb; A Simon Pickard; Dennis A Revicki
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.