Literature DB >> 24155264

Randomized control trial of composite cuspal restorations: five-year results.

W M Fennis1, R H Kuijs, F J Roeters, N H Creugers, C M Kreulen.   

Abstract

The objective of this randomized control trial was to compare the five-year clinical performance of direct and indirect resin composite restorations replacing cusps. In 157 patients, 176 restorations were made to restore maxillary premolars with Class II cavities and one missing cusp. Ninety-two direct and 84 indirect resin composite restorations were placed by two operators, following a strict protocol. Treatment technique and operator were assigned randomly. Follow-up period was at least 4.5 yrs. Survival rates were determined with time to reparable failure and complete failure as endpoints. Kaplan-Meier five-year survival rates were 86.6% (SE 0.27%) for reparable failure and 87.2% (SE 0.27%) for complete failure. Differences between survival rates of direct and indirect restorations [89.9% (SE 0.34%) vs. 83.2% (SE 0.42%) for reparable failure and 91.2% (SE 0.32%) vs. 83.2% (SE 0.42%) for complete failure] were not statistically significant (p = .23 for reparable failure; p = .15 for complete failure). Mode of failure was predominantly adhesive. The results suggest that direct and indirect techniques provide comparable results over the long term (trial registration number: ISRCTN29200848).

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical studies/trials; composite materials; operative dentistry; prosthetic dentistry/prosthodontics; restorative dentistry; restorative materials

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24155264      PMCID: PMC3872857          DOI: 10.1177/0022034513510946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  27 in total

Review 1.  Minimal intervention dentistry--a review. FDI Commission Project 1-97.

Authors:  M J Tyas; K J Anusavice; J E Frencken; G J Mount
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.512

2.  Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration.

Authors:  A J Feilzer; A J De Gee; C L Davidson
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for posterior teeth.

Authors:  Daniel Edelhoff; John A Sorensen
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Computer-aided-design/computer-assisted-manufactured adhesive restoration of molars with a compromised cusp: effect of fiber-reinforced immediate dentin sealing and cusp overlap on fatigue strength.

Authors:  Pascal Magne; Luís L Boff; Elisa Oderich; Antônio C Cardoso
Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 2.843

5.  Comparison of marginal adaptation between direct and indirect composites.

Authors:  G W Reeves; D L Lentz; J W O'Hara; M D McDaniel; W E Tolbert
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.440

6.  A survey of cusp fractures in a population of general dental practices.

Authors:  Willem M M Fennis; Ruud H Kuijs; Cees M Kreulen; F Joost M Roeters; Nico H J Creugers; Rob C W Burgersdijk
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.681

7.  Incidence rates for complete cusp fracture.

Authors:  J D Bader; J A Martin; D A Shugars
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.383

8.  In vitro fracture resistance of fiber reinforced cusp-replacing composite restorations.

Authors:  Willem M M Fennis; Arzu Tezvergil; Ruud H Kuijs; Lippo V J Lassila; Cees M Kreulen; Nico H J Creugers; Pekka K Vallittu
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.304

9.  Postoperative pulpal and repair responses.

Authors:  P E Murray; I About; P J Lumley; G Smith; J C Franquin; A J Smith
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.634

10.  Fatigue resistance of teeth restored with cuspal-coverage composite restorations.

Authors:  Willem M M Fennis; Ruud H Kuijs; Cees M Kreulen; Nico Verdonschot; Nico H J Creugers
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.681

View more
  10 in total

1.  Do composite resin restorations protect cracked teeth? An in-vitro study.

Authors:  O Naka; B J Millar; D Sagris; C David
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM resin composite molar crowns.

Authors:  Fatma A Shembish; Hui Tong; Marina Kaizer; Malvin N Janal; Van P Thompson; Niek J Opdam; Yu Zhang
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 5.304

3.  A retrospective multicenter study comparing metal-ceramic and composite single crowns performed in public general dentistry: 5-year results.

Authors:  Jennie Overmeer; Birger Narby; Lars Hjalmarsson; Kristina Arnrup; Alf Eliasson
Journal:  Acta Biomater Odontol Scand       Date:  2016-02-01

4.  The effect of short fiber composite base on microleakage and load-bearing capacity of posterior restorations.

Authors:  Sufyan K Garoushi; Marwa Hatem; Lippo V J Lassila; Pekka K Vallittu
Journal:  Acta Biomater Odontol Scand       Date:  2015-04-14

Review 5.  Clinical performance of direct versus indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth: A systematic review.

Authors:  Rubeena Abdul Azeem; Nivedhitha Malli Sureshbabu
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

6.  Clinical Behavior of Ceramic, Hybrid and Composite Onlays. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Naia Bustamante-Hernández; Jose María Montiel-Company; Carlos Bellot-Arcís; José Félix Mañes-Ferrer; María Fernanda Solá-Ruíz; Rubén Agustín-Panadero; Lucía Fernández-Estevan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Survival of Prosthodontic Restorations Luted with Resin-Based versus Composite-Based Cements: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ján Staněk; Abanoub Riad; Adam Le; Matěj Bernát; Milad Hammal; Basel Azar
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-02       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Fatigue performance of endodontically treated premolars restored with direct and indirect cuspal coverage restorations utilizing fiber-reinforced cores.

Authors:  Márk Fráter; Tekla Sáry; Janka Molnár; Gábor Braunitzer; Lippo Lassila; Pekka K Vallittu; Sufyan Garoushi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  A 3-Year Clinical Evaluation of Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth Restored with Resin Nanoceramic Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacture (CAD/CAM)-Fabricated Partial Crowns.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Xiao-Xia Hou; Maihefuzi Aishan; Meng-Ting Tian; Hui-Yu He
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2022-08-18

10.  Short fiber reinforced composite: a new alternative for direct onlay restorations.

Authors:  Sufyan Garoushi; Enas Mangoush; Mangoush Vallittu; Lippo Lassila
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2013-12-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.