Literature DB >> 15237878

Fatigue resistance of teeth restored with cuspal-coverage composite restorations.

Willem M M Fennis1, Ruud H Kuijs, Cees M Kreulen, Nico Verdonschot, Nico H J Creugers.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study assessed the influence of palatal cuspal coverage on the in vitro fatigue resistance and failure mode of Class II resin composite restorations including replacement of the buccal cusp in premolars.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A master model was made of a maxillary premolar with an MOD amalgam cavity and a simulated fracture of the buccal cusp from the isthmus floor to the CEJ. Using a copy-milling machine, this preparation was copied to 20 extracted human maxillary premolars (group A). Subsequently, the palatal cusp was reduced by 1.5 mm; this modified preparation was copied to 20 additional maxillary premolars (group B). Direct resin composite restorations were made in all teeth. Cyclic load (5 Hz) was applied, starting with a load of 200 N (10,000 cycles), followed by stages of 400, 600, 800, and 1,000 N at a maximum of 50,000 cycles each. Samples were loaded until fracture or to a maximum of 210,000 cycles.
RESULTS: Of the restored premolars of group A, 20% withstood all 210,000 loading cycles; in group B, this figure was 55%. In group A, 19% of the fractures ended below the CEJ; in group B, 78% did.
CONCLUSION: Palatal cuspal coverage increased the fatigue resistance of Class II resin composite restorations with replacement of the buccal cusp in premolars. However, fractures of restorations with cuspal coverage led to more dramatic failures that made restoration virtually impossible. This suggests caution in lowering remaining cusps for these adhesive restorations in the clinical situation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15237878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  13 in total

1.  The influence of the cavity preparation design on marginal accuracy of laboratory-processed resin composite restorations.

Authors:  Rodrigo Borges Fonseca; Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho; Alfredo Júlio Fernandes-Neto; Paulo Sérgio Quagliatto; Carlos José Soares
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Mechanical interactions of cuspal-coverage designs and cement thickness in a cusp-replacing ceramic premolar restoration: a finite element study.

Authors:  Yen-Hsiang Chang; Wen-Hsueng Lin; Wen-Chieh Kuo; Chia-Yu Chang; Chun-Li Lin
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Do composite resin restorations protect cracked teeth? An in-vitro study.

Authors:  O Naka; B J Millar; D Sagris; C David
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Randomized control trial of composite cuspal restorations: five-year results.

Authors:  W M Fennis; R H Kuijs; F J Roeters; N H Creugers; C M Kreulen
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 6.116

5.  Influence of cavity design preparation on stress values in maxillary premolar: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Ivana Kantardzić; Darko Vasiljević; Larisa Blazić; Ognjan Luzanin
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.351

6.  In vitro repair of fractured fiber-reinforced cusp-replacing composite restorations.

Authors:  Willem M M Fennis; Cees M Kreulen; Arzu Tezvergil; Lippo V J Lassila; Pekka K Vallittu; Nico H J Creugers
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2011-09-15

7.  Efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: study protocol for the CECOIA randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hélène Fron Chabouis; Caroline Prot; Cyrille Fonteneau; Karim Nasr; Olivier Chabreron; Stéphane Cazier; Christian Moussally; Alexandre Gaucher; Inès Khabthani Ben Jaballah; Renaud Boyer; Jean-François Leforestier; Aurore Caumont-Prim; Florence Chemla; Louis Maman; Cathy Nabet; Jean-Pierre Attal
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Influence of the indirect restoration design on the fracture resistance: a finite element study.

Authors:  May Lei Mei; Ya Ming Chen; Hao Li; Chun Hung Chu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Examination of ceramic restoration adhesive coverage in cusp-replacement premolar using acoustic emission under fatigue testing.

Authors:  Yen-Hsiang Chang; Jin-Jie Yu; Chun-Li Lin
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  The Influence of Composite Thickness with or without Fibers on Fracture Resistance of Direct Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth.

Authors:  Hassan Torabzadeh; Amir Ghassemi; Masoud Sanei; Sara Razmavar; Seyedeh Mahsa Sheikh-Al-Eslamian
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2014-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.