BACKGROUND: Prostate tumor-initiating cells (TICs) have intrinsic resistance to current therapies. TICs are commonly isolated by cell sorting or dye exclusion, however, isolating TICs from limited primary prostate cancer (PCa) tissues is inherently inefficient. We adapted the collagen adherence feature to develop a combined immunophenotypic and time-of-adherence assay to identify human prostate TICs. METHODS: PCa cells from multiple cell lines and primary tissues were allowed to adhere to several matrix molecules, and fractions of adherent cells were examined for their TIC properties. RESULTS: Collagen I rapidly-adherent PCa cells have significantly higher clonogenic, migration, and invasion abilities, and initiated more tumor xenografts in mice when compared to slowly-adherent and no-adherent cells. To determine the relative frequency of TICs among PCa cell lines and primary PCa cells, we utilized zebrafish xenografts to define the tumor initiation potential of serial dilutions of rapidly-adherent α2β1(hi) /CD44(hi) cells compared to non-adherent cells with α2β1(low) /CD44(low) phenotype. Tumor initiation from rapidly-adherent α2β1(hi) /CD44(hi) TICs harboring the TMPRSS2:ERG fusion generated xenografts comprising of PCa cells expressing Erg, AMACR, and PSA. Moreover, PCa-cell dissemination was consistently observed in the immune-permissive zebrafish microenvironment from as-few-as 3 rapidly-adherent α2β1(hi) /CD44(hi) cells. In zebrafish xenografts, self-renewing prostate TICs comprise 0.02-0.9% of PC3 cells, 0.3-1.3% of DU145 cells, and 0.22-14.3% of primary prostate adenocarcinomas. CONCLUSION: Zebrafish PCa xenografts were used to determine that the frequency of prostate TICs varies among PCa cell lines and primary PCa tissues. These data support a paradigm of utilizing zebrafish xenografts to evaluate novel therapies targeting TICs in prostate cancer.
BACKGROUND:Prostate tumor-initiating cells (TICs) have intrinsic resistance to current therapies. TICs are commonly isolated by cell sorting or dye exclusion, however, isolating TICs from limited primary prostate cancer (PCa) tissues is inherently inefficient. We adapted the collagen adherence feature to develop a combined immunophenotypic and time-of-adherence assay to identify human prostate TICs. METHODS: PCa cells from multiple cell lines and primary tissues were allowed to adhere to several matrix molecules, and fractions of adherent cells were examined for their TIC properties. RESULTS: Collagen I rapidly-adherent PCa cells have significantly higher clonogenic, migration, and invasion abilities, and initiated more tumor xenografts in mice when compared to slowly-adherent and no-adherent cells. To determine the relative frequency of TICs among PCa cell lines and primary PCa cells, we utilized zebrafish xenografts to define the tumor initiation potential of serial dilutions of rapidly-adherent α2β1(hi) /CD44(hi) cells compared to non-adherent cells with α2β1(low) /CD44(low) phenotype. Tumor initiation from rapidly-adherent α2β1(hi) /CD44(hi) TICs harboring the TMPRSS2:ERG fusion generated xenografts comprising of PCa cells expressing Erg, AMACR, and PSA. Moreover, PCa-cell dissemination was consistently observed in the immune-permissive zebrafish microenvironment from as-few-as 3 rapidly-adherent α2β1(hi) /CD44(hi) cells. In zebrafish xenografts, self-renewing prostate TICs comprise 0.02-0.9% of PC3 cells, 0.3-1.3% of DU145 cells, and 0.22-14.3% of primary prostate adenocarcinomas. CONCLUSION:Zebrafish PCa xenografts were used to determine that the frequency of prostate TICs varies among PCa cell lines and primary PCa tissues. These data support a paradigm of utilizing zebrafish xenografts to evaluate novel therapies targeting TICs in prostate cancer.
Authors: Gavin D Richardson; Craig N Robson; Shona H Lang; David E Neal; Norman J Maitland; Anne T Collins Journal: J Cell Sci Date: 2004-06-29 Impact factor: 5.285
Authors: Houman D Hemmati; Ichiro Nakano; Jorge A Lazareff; Michael Masterman-Smith; Daniel H Geschwind; Marianne Bronner-Fraser; Harley I Kornblum Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-11-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sheila K Singh; Ian D Clarke; Mizuhiko Terasaki; Victoria E Bonn; Cynthia Hawkins; Jeremy Squire; Peter B Dirks Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-09-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Monica Bartucci; Mohamed S Hussein; Eric Huselid; Kathleen Flaherty; Michele Patrizii; Saurabh V Laddha; Cindy Kui; Rachel A Bigos; John A Gilleran; Mervat M S El Ansary; Mona A M Awad; S David Kimball; David J Augeri; Hatem E Sabaawy Journal: Target Oncol Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 4.493
Authors: Nitu Bansal; Monica Bartucci; Shamila Yusuff; Stephani Davis; Kathleen Flaherty; Eric Huselid; Michele Patrizii; Daniel Jones; Liangxian Cao; Nadiya Sydorenko; Young-Choon Moon; Hua Zhong; Daniel J Medina; John Kerrigan; Mark N Stein; Isaac Y Kim; Thomas W Davis; Robert S DiPaola; Joseph R Bertino; Hatem E Sabaawy Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-06-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Haneen Amawi; Alaa A A Aljabali; Sai H S Boddu; Sadam Amawi; Mohammad A Obeid; Charles R Ashby; Amit K Tiwari Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2021-01-03 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Giacomo Miserocchi; Chiara Spadazzi; Sebastiano Calpona; Francesco De Rosa; Alice Usai; Alessandro De Vita; Chiara Liverani; Claudia Cocchi; Silvia Vanni; Chiara Calabrese; Massimo Bassi; Giovanni De Luca; Giuseppe Meccariello; Toni Ibrahim; Marco Schiavone; Laura Mercatali Journal: J Pers Med Date: 2022-05-24
Authors: Efraín A Cermeño; Meghan J O'Melia; Woojin M Han; Austin Veith; Graham Barber; Emina H Huang; Susan N Thomas; Andrés J García Journal: Integr Biol (Camb) Date: 2020-02-22 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Karla C M Costa; Tamires A V Brigante; Gabriel G Fernandes; Davi S Scomparin; Franciele F Scarante; Danielle P de Oliveira; Alline C Campos Journal: eNeuro Date: 2021-06-02