Literature DB >> 24153416

Diagnosis of neurally mediated syncope at initial evaluation and with tilt table testing compared with that revealed by prolonged ECG monitoring. An analysis from the Third International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE-3).

Andrea Ungar1, Paolo Sgobino, Vitantonio Russo, Elena Vitale, Richard Sutton, Donato Melissano, Xulio Beiras, Nicola Bottoni, Hans H Ebert, Michele Gulizia, Marcella Jorfida, Angel Moya, Dietrich Andresen, Nicoletta Grovale, Michele Brignole.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: According to the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology, a presumed diagnosis of neurally mediated syncope (NMS) can be made when patients have a consistent history and competing diagnoses are excluded. In the present study, we compared the initial diagnosis of NMS by means of implantable loop recorder (ILR) documentation.
METHODS: In this prospective multicentre observational study which involved 51 hospitals in nine countries in Europe and Canada, 504 NMS patients ≥40 years, who had suffered ≥3 syncopal episodes in the previous 2 years received an ILR and were followed up for a mean of 15±11 months.
RESULTS: ILR recorded a spontaneous syncope in 187 cases, with an estimated diagnostic yield of 47% at 3 years. ILR findings were consistent with the initial diagnosis of presumed NMS in 162 (87%) patients whereas did not confirm NMS in another 25 (13%), who had an intrinsic cardiac arrhythmic cause (atrial tachyarrhythmias (#6), long pause on termination of tachyarrhythmia (#8), persistent bradycardia (#3), ventricular tachycardia (#4)) or a non-arrhythmic loss of consciousness (non-syncopal (#3), orthostatic hypotension (#1)). No clinical baseline feature was able to predict an intrinsic cardiac cause with the exception of more frequent non-syncopal atrial tachyarrhythmias on clinical history, which were present in 38% of cardiac versus 5% of NMS patients (p=0.001). Tilt table testing (TT) was positive in 76/136 (56%) presumed NMS and in 9/21 (43%) non-NMS patients (p=0.35); an asystolic response was present in 28/136 (21%) NMS and in 0/21 (0%) non-NMS patients (p=0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: ILR findings showed results other than NMS in a small, although non-negligible, number of patients older than 40 years. TT was unable to discriminate between presumed NMS and non-NMS with the exception of an asystolic response which was highly specific.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24153416     DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  7 in total

1.  [Diagnostics and treatment of syncope].

Authors:  Peter Dovjak
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 2.  Vasovagal syncope with asystole: the role of cardiac pacing.

Authors:  Michele Brignole; Marco Tomaino; Alessio Gargaro
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.435

3.  Head-Up Tilt Test in Risk Stratification of Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Hana Sediva; T Hnat; J Bonaventura; J Slesarenko; J Veselka
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2019-06-16

4.  Neurally mediated syncope diagnosis based on adenylate cyclase activity in Japanese patients.

Authors:  Tomoyoshi Komiyama; Eiichiro Nagata; Tadashi Hashida; Susumu Sakama; Kengo Ayabe; Hiroshi Kamiguchi; Ayumi Sasaki; Koichiro Yoshioka; Hiroyuki Kobayashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Diagnosis and prevention of the vasodepressor type of neurally mediated syncope in Japanese patients.

Authors:  Misaki Hasegawa; Tomoyoshi Komiyama; Kengo Ayabe; Susumu Sakama; Tetsuri Sakai; Kyong Hee Lee; Masahiro Morise; Atsuhiko Yagishita; Mari Amino; Ayumi Sasaki; Eiichiro Nagata; Hiroyuki Kobayashi; Koichiro Yoshioka; Yuji Ikari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The Current Indication for Pacemaker in Patients with Cardioinhibitory Vasovagal Syncope.

Authors:  Rose Mary Ferreira Lisboa da Silva
Journal:  Open Cardiovasc Med J       Date:  2016-08-26

7.  Tilt test in paced patients: Is it worth the effort?

Authors:  Kartikeya Bhargava
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2015-10-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.