Literature DB >> 24152416

Evidence for continuous glucose monitoring: sufficient for reimbursement?

L Heinemann1, J H DeVries.   

Abstract

Evidence for continuous glucose monitoring is mounting. Meta-analyses consistently show lowering of HbA1c , and the first trial reporting a reduction in severe hypoglycaemic events in patients with hypoglycaemia unawareness has recently been presented. The more recent trials studied larger numbers of patients and may have shown better results because of improved technology. The various combinations of pump and sensor, with automated bolus calculators and low glucose suspend features, make evaluation more challenging from a reimbursement point of view, but evidence seems convincing enough to justify reimbursement for selected patient groups, including those who have shown a substantial improvement in HbA1c during a trial period, and those with hypoglycaemia unawareness who encountered severe hypoglycaemia in the recent past. More data on cost-efficacy are needed.
© 2013 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine © 2013 Diabetes UK.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24152416     DOI: 10.1111/dme.12341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  5 in total

1.  HypoDE: Research Design and Methods of a Randomized Controlled Study Evaluating the Impact of Real-Time CGM Usage on the Frequency of CGM Glucose Values <55 mg/dl in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes and Problematic Hypoglycemia Treated With Multiple Daily Injections.

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann; Dorothee Deiss; Norbert Hermanns; Claudia Graham; Matthias Kaltheuner; Andreas Liebl; David Price
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-03-09

2.  Development and Validation of a Tool to Identify Patients With Type 2 Diabetes at High Risk of Hypoglycemia-Related Emergency Department or Hospital Use.

Authors:  Andrew J Karter; E Margaret Warton; Kasia J Lipska; James D Ralston; Howard H Moffet; Geoffrey G Jackson; Elbert S Huang; Donald R Miller
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  CGM Versus FGM; or, Continuous Glucose Monitoring Is Not Flash Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-09-01

4.  Routine use of continuous glucose monitoring in 10 501 people with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  T Battelino; S Liabat; H J Veeze; J Castañeda; A Arrieta; O Cohen
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.359

Review 5.  The Hypoglycaemia-Hyperglycaemia Minimizer System in the Management of Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Brian L Levy; Thomas W McCann; Daniel A Finan
Journal:  Eur Endocrinol       Date:  2016-03-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.