A M Sevy1, J F Healey, W Deng, P C Spiegel, S L Meeks, R Li. 1. Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The development of anti-factor VIII antibodies (inhibitors) is a significant complication in the management of patients with hemophilia A, leading to significant increases in morbidity and treatment cost. Using a panel of mAbs against different epitopes on FVIII, we have recently shown that epitope specificity, inhibitor kinetics and time to maximum inhibition are more important than inhibitor titer in predicting responses to FVIII and the combination of FVIII and recombinant FVIIa. In particular, a subset of high-titer inhibitors responded to high-dose FVIII, which would not be predicted on the basis of their inhibitor titer alone. Thus, the ability to quickly map the epitope spectrum of patient plasma with a clinically feasible assay may fundamentally change how clinicians approach the treatment of high-titer inhibitor patients. OBJECTIVES: To map the epitopes of anti-FVIII mAbs, three of which are classic inhibitors and one of which is a non-classic inhibitor, by the use of hydrogen-deuterium exchange coupled with mass spectrometry (HDX-MS). METHODS: The binding epitopes of four mAbs targeting the FVIII C2 domain were mapped with HDX-MS. RESULTS: The epitopes determined with HDX-MS are consistent with those obtained earlier through structural characterization and antibody competition assays. In addition, classic and non-classic inhibitor epitopes could be distinguished by the use of a limited subset of C2 domain-derived peptic fragments. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the HDX-MS method for epitope mapping, and suggest a potential role of rapid mapping of FVIII inhibitor epitopes in facilitating individualized treatment of inhibitor patients.
BACKGROUND: The development of anti-factor VIII antibodies (inhibitors) is a significant complication in the management of patients with hemophilia A, leading to significant increases in morbidity and treatment cost. Using a panel of mAbs against different epitopes on FVIII, we have recently shown that epitope specificity, inhibitor kinetics and time to maximum inhibition are more important than inhibitor titer in predicting responses to FVIII and the combination of FVIII and recombinant FVIIa. In particular, a subset of high-titer inhibitors responded to high-dose FVIII, which would not be predicted on the basis of their inhibitor titer alone. Thus, the ability to quickly map the epitope spectrum of patient plasma with a clinically feasible assay may fundamentally change how clinicians approach the treatment of high-titer inhibitor patients. OBJECTIVES: To map the epitopes of anti-FVIII mAbs, three of which are classic inhibitors and one of which is a non-classic inhibitor, by the use of hydrogen-deuterium exchange coupled with mass spectrometry (HDX-MS). METHODS: The binding epitopes of four mAbs targeting the FVIII C2 domain were mapped with HDX-MS. RESULTS: The epitopes determined with HDX-MS are consistent with those obtained earlier through structural characterization and antibody competition assays. In addition, classic and non-classic inhibitor epitopes could be distinguished by the use of a limited subset of C2 domain-derived peptic fragments. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the HDX-MS method for epitope mapping, and suggest a potential role of rapid mapping of FVIII inhibitor epitopes in facilitating individualized treatment of inhibitor patients.
Authors: D Scandella; G E Gilbert; M Shima; H Nakai; C Eagleson; M Felch; R Prescott; K J Rajalakshmi; L W Hoyer; E Saenko Journal: Blood Date: 1995-09-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: G L Bray; E D Gomperts; S Courter; R Gruppo; E M Gordon; M Manco-Johnson; A Shapiro; E Scheibel; G White; M Lee Journal: Blood Date: 1994-05-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: M G Jacquemin; B G Desqueper; A Benhida; L Vander Elst; M F Hoylaerts; M Bakkus; K Thielemans; J Arnout; K Peerlinck; J G Gilles; J Vermylen; J M Saint-Remy Journal: Blood Date: 1998-07-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Jarrod J Mousa; Marion F Sauer; Alexander M Sevy; Jessica A Finn; John T Bates; Gabriela Alvarado; Hannah G King; Leah B Loerinc; Rachel H Fong; Benjamin J Doranz; Bruno E Correia; Oleksandr Kalyuzhniy; Xiaolin Wen; Theodore S Jardetzky; William R Schief; Melanie D Ohi; Jens Meiler; James E Crowe Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-10-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Phuong-Cac T Nguyen; Kenneth B Lewis; Ruth A Ettinger; Jason T Schuman; Jasper C Lin; John F Healey; Shannon L Meeks; Pete Lollar; Kathleen P Pratt Journal: Blood Date: 2014-03-03 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Glaivy Batsuli; Wei Deng; John F Healey; Ernest T Parker; W Hunter Baldwin; Courtney Cox; Brenda Nguyen; Joerg Kahle; Christoph Königs; Renhao Li; Pete Lollar; Shannon L Meeks Journal: Blood Date: 2016-07-05 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Zoja Soloviev; Joshua M A Bullock; Juliette M B James; Andrea C Sauerwein; Joanne E Nettleship; Raymond J Owens; D Flemming Hansen; Maya Topf; Konstantinos Thalassinos Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom Date: 2022-01-18 Impact factor: 3.036
Authors: Estelle K Ronayne; Shaun C Peters; Joseph S Gish; Celena Wilson; H Trent Spencer; Christopher B Doering; Pete Lollar; P Clint Spiegel; Kenneth C Childers Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2021-06-10 Impact factor: 7.561