Literature DB >> 24150617

Comparison of the Traditional, Swing, and Chicken Wing Volleyball Blocking Techniques in NCAA Division I Female Athletes.

Taubi J Neves1, Wayne A Johnson, J William Myrer, Matthew K Seeley.   

Abstract

In volleyball, blocking is highly correlated with team success. The identification of specific techniques that produce a more successful block would be helpful knowledge for coaches and players. This study compared the traditional, swing, and "chicken wing" blocking techniques in combination with the running step footwork pattern in order to determine which technique enabled athletes to perform a more effective block. High-speed videography (7 cameras, Vicon Motion Analysis System) was used to capture the blocking movements of thirteen female NCAA Division I athletes (age = 19.4 ± 1.19 years, height = 1.82 ± 0.08 m, mass = 70.63 ± 7.96 kg, and years of participation at the collegiate level = 2.23 ± 1.17 years). Each player was familiar with each blocking technique. Reflective markers were placed on the players and in randomized order the players performed 3 blocking trials of each technique. The following dependent variables were assessed: The time it took the athletes to get off the ground and get their hands above (vertically) the net was calculated. The distance the hand reached over the net or hand penetration (displacement between the net and finger in the anterior and vertical planes) was also measured. Lastly, jump height was calculated. Repeated measures ANOVA and post-hoc comparisons were done (α = 0.05). There was no significant difference in the main effect for time to get off the ground (p > 0.05). There was a significant difference in the time to get the hands above the net (p < 0.05). The swing block was best for jump height (p <.001) and hand penetration (p < 0.05). These results can help coaches and players decide which blocking technique will benefit them most as a blocking team and as individual blockers. Key pointsThe swing blocking technique resulted in greater jump heights and increased hand penetration, relative to the traditional and chicken wing blocking techniques.The chicken wing blocking technique resulted in greater jump heights and increased hand penetration, relative to the traditional blocking technique.THE TRADITIONAL BLOCKING TECHNIQUE DOES NOT APPEAR TO PROVIDE ANY COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE RELATED TO THE VARIABLES OBSERVED DURING THIS STUDY: (1) duration spent getting off of the ground and placing hands over the net, (2) jump height, and (3) hand penetration magnitude.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Motion analysis; counter- movement; volleyball defense.

Year:  2011        PMID: 24150617      PMCID: PMC3737818     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  17 in total

1.  Gender differences in lower extremity kinematics, kinetics and energy absorption during landing.

Authors:  Michael J Decker; Michael R Torry; Douglas J Wyland; William I Sterett; J Richard Steadman
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Statistical analyses of volleyball team performance.

Authors:  H J Eom; R W Schutz
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  The energetics and benefit of an arm swing in submaximal and maximal vertical jump performance.

Authors:  Adrian Lees; Jos Vanrenterghem; Dirk De Clercq
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.337

4.  Contribution of arm movement to the force components of a maximum vertical jump.

Authors:  A B Shetty; B R Etnyre
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.751

5.  Knee joint dynamics predict patellar tendinitis in elite volleyball players.

Authors:  D P Richards; S V Ajemian; J P Wiley; R F Zernicke
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Electromechanical behaviour of human muscles in vertical jumps.

Authors:  J T Viitasalo; C Bosco
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1982

7.  Characteristics of volleyball players and success in a national tournament.

Authors:  L B Gladden; D Colacino
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 1.637

8.  Sagittal-plane trunk position, landing forces, and quadriceps electromyographic activity.

Authors:  J Troy Blackburn; Darin A Padua
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Gender differences in lower extremity landing mechanics caused by neuromuscular fatigue.

Authors:  Thomas W Kernozek; Michael R Torry; Mark Iwasaki
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Gender bias in the effects of arms and countermovement on jumping performance.

Authors:  Mark S Walsh; Harald Böhm; Michelle M Butterfield; Jabakar Santhosam
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.775

View more
  2 in total

1.  A comparison of jump height, takeoff velocities, and blocking coverage in the swing and traditional volleyball blocking techniques.

Authors:  Travis Ficklin; Robin Lund; Megan Schipper
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Effect of an Arm Swing on Countermovement Vertical Jump Performance in Elite Volleyball Players: FINAL.

Authors:  Frantisek Vaverka; Daniel Jandačka; David Zahradník; Jaroslav Uchytil; Roman Farana; Matej Supej; Janez Vodičar
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 2.193

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.